1 / 43

Rumin Wang Work done in collaboration with G. R.. Lu & Y. D. Yang

Rumin Wang Work done in collaboration with G. R.. Lu & Y. D. Yang. Huazhong Normal University Henan Normal University November 15 , 200 5 , Beijing. Outline. Motivation Theoretical input Summary. Motivation for study. To solve the polarization anomaly To solve the puzzles.

loman
Download Presentation

Rumin Wang Work done in collaboration with G. R.. Lu & Y. D. Yang

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rumin Wang Work done in collaboration with G. R.. Lu& Y. D. Yang Huazhong Normal University Henan Normal University November15, 2005, Beijing

  2. Outline • Motivation • Theoretical input • Summary

  3. Motivation for study • To solve the polarization anomaly • To solve the puzzles

  4. Decay amplitude of B to VV in helicity basis:Decay amplitudes in transversity basis:Longitudinal polarization fraction:( ~0.9 in SM )

  5. Surprise • Tree + penguin : • Pure penguin(Sensitive to NP): ??

  6. Previous study Kagan show increasing nonfactorizable contribution of annihilation diagram to solve anomaly by QCDF(hep-ph/0407076). ButH.n. Li & Mishima: annihilation contribution isnot sufficient to lower fLdown to 0.5 by PQCD (PRD 71,054025). Polarization anomaly might be due to large charming penguin contributions and final-state-interactions (FSI) by Colangelo et al. & Ladisa et al.(PLB 597,291; PRD 70,115014) . However, H. Y. Cheng et al. have found the FSI effects not able to fully account for this anomaly ( PRD 71, 014030 ). We try to solve this anomaly including RPV SUSY effects.

  7. Motivation for study • To solve the polarization anomaly • To solve the puzzles

  8. ? 1.5x10^(-6) 10^(-7) 4.6x10^(-6) 8.3x10^(-6) 0.319 -0.057

  9. ? But-0.120 0.063 in Exp. 11.4x10^(-6) 6.0x10^(-6)

  10. Previous study Buras et al. point out B to pi pi can be nicely accommodated in the SM through nonfactorizable hadronic interference effects, whereas B to pi K system may indicate NP in the electroweak penguin sector (PRL 92,101804; NPB 697,133). H. N. Li et al. & Y. D. Yang et al. study the next to leading order corrections by PQCD & QCDF, respectively. These higher order corrections may be important for Br(B to pi K), but the can not explain other experimental data(hep-ph/0508041;PRD72,074007). NP We try to calculate RPV SUSY effects .

  11. Outline • Motivation • Theoretical input • Summary

  12. The effective Hamiltonian in SM R-parity Violating SUSY QCD Factorization Theoretical input

  13. The effective weak Hamiltonian for B decays: Qi are local four-quark operators The decay amplitude in SM: The effective Hamiltonian in SM

  14. R-parity Violating SUSY S is the particle spinB is the baryon numberL is the lepton number R-parity violating superpotential: : Yukawa couplingsi, j,k :generation indicesC :charge conjugate field

  15. The four fermion effective Hamiltonians due to the exchanging of thesleptons: • The effective Hamiltonians due to the exchanging of thesquarks:

  16. R-parity Violating decay amplitude:

  17. The total decay amplitude: Naïve factorization, Generalized factorization, QCD factorization, Perturbative QCD, Light-cone QCD sum rules, Lattice QCD, Soft-collinear effective theory, etc.

  18. QCD Factorization BBNS approach: PRL 83:1914-1917,1999 NPB 591:313-418, 2000 Naïve Factorization: QCD Factorization:

  19. Outline • Motivation • Theoretical input • Summary

  20. Based on paper: Phys.Rev.D72:015009(2005)

  21. Longitudinal polarization RPV SUSY ? Polarization Anomaly !!

  22. The polarization anomaly could be solved by RPV effects.

  23. Outline • Motivation • Theoretical input • Summary

  24. Based on paper: hep-ph/0509273

  25. Branching ratios Puzzle !!

  26. Direct CP asymmetries RPV SUSY ? Puzzle !!

  27. Outline • Motivation • Theoretical input • Summary

  28. Summary • Employed QCDF to study RPV SUSY effects in following modes: • Polarization in B to VV . • Branching ratios & direct CP asymmetry in B to pi pi, pi K. • RPV couplings can give a possible solution to the puzzles. Obtain the ranges of RPV couplings, but these are very narrow. • The allowed spaces constrained by B to PP are consistent with these by B to VV decays. • An explanation is need: • SM is in no way ruled out. • Existence of New Physics. • Many more measurement are in progress.

  29. Thanks!

  30. R-parity Violating decay:

  31. Ratios of branching ratios

  32. Branching ratios

More Related