260 likes | 371 Views
An experimental performance comparison of 3G and Wi-Fi. Richard Gass (Intel Labs Pittsburgh) Christophe Diot (Technicolor). Outline. Motivation 3G vs. Wi-Fi Face-off Experiments Results Conclusions. The future of mobile communications. Number of mobile devices is increasing per user
E N D
An experimental performance comparison of 3G and Wi-Fi Richard Gass (Intel Labs Pittsburgh) Christophe Diot (Technicolor)
Outline • Motivation • 3G vs. Wi-Fi Face-off Experiments • Results • Conclusions PAM 2010 Zurich
The future of mobile communications • Number of mobile devices is increasing per user • Many useful mobile apps require the use of Internet services • Consumption of data is ever increasing • Users are straining service providers • Service providers are straining users (cost) PAM 2010 Zurich
Satisfying connectivity demands • Dominant technologies • 3G (mobile) • Wi-Fi (stationary) • 3G • Large coverage areas • Seamless connectivity • Current applications work • Data rates are low • ~386Kbits/s-2Mbits/s (3G/HDSPA) • ~3-6Mbits/s (4G/LTE)* PAM 2010 Zurich *http://nextelonline.nextel.com/
Wi-Fi Alternative • Wi-Fi has dense coverage areas in urban areas • Wi-Fi coverage area is small • Wi-Fi doesn’t provide seamless connectivity • Being always connect may not be necessary • Wi-Fi rates are fast • 11 - 54 Mbits/sec (802.11B & G) • 300 Mbits/sec (802.11N) • Potentially zero cost / MB • Open access points • Community networks PAM 2010 Zurich
3G rates exposed • 3G service is expensive • iPhone AT&T $80 (€59.25) • $30(€22.25)/month • Sprint • $60(€44.50) • Internation rates • $0.0195/KB PAM 2010 Zurich * http://support.sprint.com/support/article/Know_how_data_usage_is_calculated_and_charged_for_Sprint_Mobile_Broadband_plans/case-ye186054-20090916-160215#__highlight&id16=what+can+I+do+with+5+gig
Do this NOW! PAM 2010 Zurich
The question • What is the feasibility of using Wi-Fi as a substitute for 3G Data service • Can Wi-Fi be a substitute for data transfers that do not have delivery deadlines • My mail app checks for mail every 15 mins • What is possible today with existing open AP with default connection parameters PAM 2010 Zurich
Outline • Motivation • 3G vs. Wi-Fi Face-off Experiments • Results • Conclusions PAM 2010 Zurich
Experimental setup • iPhone 3G • Jailbroken • No hardware changes • IBM T30 laptop • Ubuntu (Hardy) • Intel 2915ABG wireless card PAM 2010 Zurich
Experiment location PAM 2010 Zurich
Experiment route • Wi-Fi • Scan • Associate • Request IP • Ping proxy • Download/Upload • Repeat • 3G • Continuous download/upload from proxy PAM 2010 Zurich
Outline • Motivation • 3G vs. Wi-Fi Face-off Experiments • Results • Conclusions PAM 2010 Zurich
3G vs Wi-Fi downloads while driving <1/3 >60% PAM 2010 Zurich
3G vs Wi-Fi downloads while walking <1/3 >73% PAM 2010 Zurich
3G vs Wi-Fi uploads while walking <1/3 >3.2x PAM 2010 Zurich
Conclusion • Opportunistic Wi-Fi performs surprisingly well when compared with 3G • Wi-Fi could provide a substitute for 3G data service • 3G service provider could offload traffic on Wi-Fi. • Imaging if there was provider support! PAM 2010 Zurich
Thanks for listening Questions? PAM 2010 Zurich
BACKUP PAM 2010 Zurich
GSM coverage PAM 2010 Zurich
Wireless Wi-Fi in the US PAM 2010 Zurich
3G uploads PAM 2010 Zurich
Bay Area, San Francisco PAM 2010 Zurich
Manhatten, New York PAM 2010 Zurich
Bad idea PAM 2010 Zurich
Wigle Stats(www.wigle.net) PAM 2010 Zurich