1 / 56

Management of Hypertension

Management of Hypertension. Dr Asso Amin General Internal Medicine and Elderly Physician. What is hypertension. Definition BHS/ ISH/ WHO/ ESH. Prevalence. Survey in England adult above 16 years, 42% men and 33% women were hypertensive * >50% of those above 65

lorant
Download Presentation

Management of Hypertension

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Management of Hypertension Dr Asso Amin General Internal Medicine and Elderly Physician

  2. What is hypertension • Definition • BHS/ ISH/ WHO/ ESH

  3. Prevalence • Survey in England adult above 16 years, 42% men and 33% women were hypertensive * • >50% of those above 65 • Systolic BP increase while diastolic falls and therefore ISH ( better prediction of CVD risk) • North England • Socio-economic class • Ethnic minorities. • Migration * Primatesta et al , Hypertension 2001 , 38: 827-832

  4. Age and hypertension

  5. Aetiology and precipitating factors • Primary 90-95% and secondary 5-10% • Causes of secondary:- • Renal:- 75% intrinsic and 25% renovascular. • Endocrine • Coarctation of aorta • Pregnancy • medication

  6. Aetiology and precipitating factors • Primary-Essential ( precipitating factors) • Excess sodium intake • Lack of physical activity • Overweight • Insufficient dietary fibre • Excess saturated fat • Stress • Alcohol excess • Low dietary potassium • Magnesium deficiency • Low calcium intake • Low vitamin C • Coffee • Lead exposure

  7. Precipitating factors

  8. Disease attributed to hypertension • Cardiac which include • CHD and MI • Heart failure • LVH ( concentric, concentric remoldelling, and eccentric) • Central nervous system • Stroke • Cerebral haemorrhage • Hypertensive encephalopathy

  9. Left Ventricular Hypertrophy • Concentric:- typical LV wall thickness and dilated LV causing increase in LV mass • Concentric remodelling hypertrophy • Eccentric hypertrophy

  10. Disease attributed to hypertension • Chronic renal failure • Pre-clampsia and eclampsia • Blindness • PVD • Cognitive function* *Hanon and Leys 2002, Cognistive decline and dementia in the elderly hypertensive JRAAS

  11. Affects of high blood pressure

  12. Assessment of hypertensive patients • Blood pressure measurement. • Large variation in normal person and therefore should follow BHS guidelines to measure BP • Larger variation associated higher risk of CHD* • Bp in both arms with lying and standing BP in diabetic and elderly • Cuff size * BHS The lancet 375, March 2010

  13. Blood pressure measurement. • Use a properly maintained, calibrated and validated device • Measure sitting blood pressure routinely: standing blood pressure should be recorded at the initial estimation in elderly and diabetic patients • Remove tight clothing, support arm at heart level, ensure hand relaxed and avoid talking during the measurement procedure • Use cuff of appropriate size • Lower mercury column slowly (2 mm/s) • Read blood pressure to the nearest 2mmHg • Measure diastolic as disappearance of sounds (phase V) • Take the mean of at least two readings, more recordings are needed if marked differences between initial measurements are found. • Do not treat on the basis of an isolated reading

  14. 5 MINUTES BREAK

  15. Blood pressure measurement • Home self BP monitoring • Advantage vs disadvantage • Levels are lower than clinic one** • How frequent and what level. • Ambulatory BP monitoring • More use of AMBP with guidelines from BHS/ESH* • Indications ( student to search for indication) * O’Brien at al .European Society of hypertension recommendation for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J hypertension 2003 ** ( Yarows et al Home blood pressure monitoring. Arch Inter Medicine 2000

  16. 24- hours BP measurement

  17. Hypertensive patient initial evaluation • Document the following • Possible secondary causes • Contributory factors • Complication of hypertension • CVD risk • Contraindication of specific medication

  18. Hypertensive patient initial evaluation • History taking • Examination • Signs of secondary causes • Signs of end organ damage • Investigation (routine)* • urine strip test for protein and blood; • _ serum creatinine and electrolytes; • _ blood glucose—ideally fasted; • _ lipid profile—ideally fasted; • _ electrocardiogram (ECG). • *BHS –Guidlines 2004

  19. CVD risk assessment • Many tools are available • Framingham risk score for CHD • Cardiovascular Risk Predictor Charts for primary prevention ( modified Framingham) * • Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) • SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) project • Reynolds Risk score • ASSIGN( Assessing cardiovascular Risk to Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network • QRISK ( QRESEARCH Cardiovascular Risk Algorithm) * Heart 2005

  20. CVD risk assessment • Comparing the tools • Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Chart • Absolute risk- age issue • More CHD>CVD risk assessment • No Consideration to FHx, Weight, Ethnicity • NICE-2008- guidelines 65 lipid modification-cardiovascular risk assessment (Modified version) . • Increase by 1.5 Fhx of premature CHD ( male 1st degree < 55 + female <65) • Increase by 1.5-2.0 if more than one member • Increase by 1.4 for South Asian men ( ?Kurdish men) • BMI > 40 • LVH and above 75

  21. CVD risk assessment • Q RISK include the following:- • age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, systolic BP, ratio TSC/HDL, BMI, family hx of CHD in first degree relative under 60, deprivation score, treated hypertension-DM-renal disease- AF-RA. • QRISK Vs modified CVD predictor chart suggested by NICE* * 2.3 million patients 35-74, from different areas , and different ethnic background (BMJ 2008) • More accurate • High PPV ( false positive in CVD predictor 41.1% ( risk was 16%) Vs 15% but risk was still 23% above 20% target)

  22. CVD risk assessment • Diabetic considered as coronary equivalent • ATP III report and Finnish study * * Evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure and cholesterol in adult . Adult Treatment Panel III , circulation 2003 *Haffner et al Ne Eng.J Med 1998 ( Finnish)

  23. Blood Pressure Treatment Threshold • Who to treat? • Malignant hypertension Admission for emergency treatment • BP >= 220/120 Treat immediately. • BP>= 180-219/ 110-119 Confirm over 1-2 weeks then treat • BP 160-179/ 100-109 • Yes confirm 3-4 weeks • BP 140-159/90-99 CVD complication/TOD/CV risk>20% • Yes confirm in 12 weeks and treat X measure monthly • < 140/90 Reassess annually • <130/85 Reassess every 5 years

  24. Blood Pressure Treatment Threshold

  25. Treatment of hypertension • Life style measures • Weight reduction • Reduced salt intake • Limitation of alcohol consumption • Increased physical activity • Increased fruit and vegetable consumption • Reduced total fat and saturated fat intake • 2. Measures to reduce cardiovascular disease risk • Cessation of smoking • Reduced total fat and saturated fat intake • Replacement of saturated fats with mono-unsaturated fats • Increased oily fish consumption *Bianchi et al (2008), Internal and emergency medicine * Ahmed N et al (2008) Journal of Ayub Medical College

  26. Treatment of hypertension • ACE and ARB • thiazide type diuretic • calcium channel blockers • B-blocker • alpha blockers • K-sparing diuretic like spironolactone and amiloride

  27. Treatment of hypertension

  28. Blood Pressure Target • How far should we treat?? • Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) trial* • HOT in diabetic / UKPDS/ ABCD* • Heart Outcome Prevention Evaluation (HOPE)* • European trial On Reduction of cardiac events with peindropril in stable coronary artery disease (EUROPA)* • ALLHAT* • HOT trial in non diabetic* * SHEP in JAMA 1991 * HOT lancet 1998 * UKPDS 38 Br Med J 1998 * HOPE N Engl J Med 2000 * EUROPA Lancet 2003 *ALLHAT JAMA 2002

  29. Blood Pressure Target • Target to achieve

  30. Upper Age to treat • Up to 80 years old • After 80 years old • HYVETHypertension in the Very Elderly Trial • 3845 patient 80 years or above from Europe, China, Australia and Tunisia • BP > 160 received indapamide m/r Vs placebo and perindripril Vs placebo • Well matched 1933 on treatment Vs 1912 mean age 83 and bp 170/90 • 30% reduction of fatal/non fatal stroke, 39% reduction in rate of death from stroke, 21% reduction in rate of death any cause, 23% reduction death from CVD, 64% in rate of HF

  31. Lowering BP or a specific drug • Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) • Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialsits’ Collaboration ( BPLTTC). • CAPPP ( captopril and B-blocker) • SYST-EURO • STOP-2 ( Swedish Trial in Older Patient with Hypertension-2) compared ACE/CCB/diuretic/B-blocker • INSIGHT. • Studies for each group of medication.

  32. Evidence-based management of hypertension (QUIZ) • Amlodpine • Thiazide-diuretic • ACE inhibitor • ARB • Alpha blocker • Diltiazem • B-blocker • 75 years old man with history of gout has persistent BP > 170/80 • 50 Afro-Carribean with persistent BP > 175/89 • 70 years old with history of prostatic hypertrophy had BP of 168/90 • 53 years old female diabetic , with history of CCF has BP of 155/85 • 60 years old women on amlodipine and ramipril complaining of persistence cough • 65 years old patient with history of angina has BP of 166/90 for 4 weeks

  33. Case Studies 1 • 65 years old from Kirkuk, presented with headache for 3 weeks , associated with feeling unwell and tired. • O/E looking well, BP 165/ 105. • QUESION ??? • What do you do like to ask now? • What do you like to examine? Or to measure next? • Investigation ? • Do you start treatment now? • What do you advise him to do ? • What drug do you start on?

  34. Case Studies 1 • Past medical history :- Nil • Family history:- mother had a MI at the age of 60 • Social history:- Lives with wife and a daughter, smokes 5 cigarette a day , no alcohol, retired. • Drug history :- nil • O/E :- height 178 weight 93, HS normal, JVP not elevated, Apex beat in 5th ICS mid-clavicular line, no retinopathy • Investigation:- U&E normal, TSC 6.1, HDL 1.1, glucose 5.0 , urine nad

  35. Case study 2 • 46 years old man from Rania, presented with weakness, Blood pressure was checked by a HCA on 3 occasion, 2 weeks a part and was consistently high at 155/94. • What do you like to do next?

  36. Case study 2 • Past medical history:- appendicectomy , and chronic back pain • Family history:- father had Angioplasty at age of 55 • Social history:- smokes 10 a day, no alcohol, shopkeeper , lives with family • Drug history:- Nil • O/E BMI 29, BP 154/93 , HS normal, no eye signs • Ix:- Cholesterol 5.9, HDL 1.2, glucose 4.0, ECG no LVH, urine normal.

  37. Thiazide like diuretic • Bendrofluazide and indapamide • Mechanism of action • Benefits • in ALLHAT study similar decrease of CVD risk compared to ACE and CCB , with no change in renal function can be used with GFR of 30 • Side Effect • Hypo Na, K, Ca, Mg • Activate renin-angiotensin system limiting their antipertensive action* • Metabolic:- glucose , uric acid cholesterol • Hyperglycaemia risk is double and more with severe hypokalaemia. * *Kjeldesen SE et al Am J Cardiovascular drugs 2005 *Zillich AJ Hypertension 2006

  38. ACE Inhibitor • Mechanism of action • ramipril, lisinopril, captopril, enalapril, fosinopril, perindripril, cilzapril, imidapril,quinapril • Benefits reduce CVD mortality and morbidity specially in diabetic • HOPE • The Captopril Prevention Project Trial CAPPP • The Fosinopril versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events rndomized trial (FACET) • The Appropriate BP Control Diabetes (ABCD) • Side effects

  39. ARB • Mechanism of action • Candesartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, olmesartan, eprosartan, valsartan • Advantages* • As effective as ACE in reducing BP but even more sustained in PRISMA ( Protective, Randomized, Investigation of Safety and efficacy of Micardisvsramipril using AMBP. Also MICCAT-2 ( Micardis Community Ambulatory Monitoring Trial 2). • Work for all ethnicity, age, sex, diabetic and non diabetic ( INCLUSIVE) • Reduce CVD , fatal and non fatal stroke, CVS death ( ON TARGET, LIFE, VALUE, MOSES) • Reduce hospital admission in HF ( VALUE and CHARM) • Reduce AF by 30% compared to b-blocker (LIFE) • Diabetes by 23% compared to CCB in (VALUE) • Tolerability (INCLUSIVE and ON TARGET) * Michael weber , Acheiving blood pressure goals :should angiotensin II receptor blockers become first line treatment in hypertension ? J ournal of Hypertension 2009.

  40. Aliskiren • A novel direct renin inhibitor • Licensed to use in hypertension either alone or in conjunction with ACE/ARB/thizide • Reduce SBP by 12-16mmHg and DBP by 2-12mmHg • Better tolerated • No studies available for CVD risk reduction • 150-300mg od * Aliskiren : an oral renin inhibitor for the treatment of hypertension , Cardiology in Review 2007

  41. Calcium Channel Blockers • Mechanism of action • Interfere with the inward displacement of calcium ions through the active cell membrane. Influence myocardial cells , cells of within the specialised conducting system of the heart and cells of vascular smooth muscle . • Types • Dihydropyridine like amlodipine, nimodipine, lacidipine, felodipine ..etc • Verapamil and diltiazem. • Advantages • In hypertension, angina, arrhythmia, • 25 % reduction of non-fatal stroke in all studies (STOP-2, ABCD, INDT, FACET) • May increase risk of MI by adrenergic stimulation (FACET) • Compared to ACE less affect on albuminuria but renoprotection through afferent and efferent renal arteriole dilitation.

  42. Mono or Combined therapy • More than 50% of hypertensive will require combined therapy and more 75% of diabetic will need more than one agent.* • Combined therapy had additive affect on lowering BP and less than additive for SE* • Better tolerability * UKPD 38 in BMJ 1998 * Law et al , value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomized trials BMJ 2003

  43. Separate or Fixed combined • Advantages • Compliance • Cost reduction • Disadvantages • Does not always allow dose adjustment • More postural hypotension • Sometimes size of tablet

  44. ACE combination • With diuretic • 1983 two multicentre trials compared captopril alone or in combination of diuretic HCTZ. The combination had less hypokalaemia, hyperuricaemia or hyperglycaemia. • RCT (ADVANCE)* no deterioration in glycaemia control in type 2 diabetes randomised to perindropril and indapamide . The combination had less CV events, death and synergic affect on albuminuria • Preterax in Albuminuria Regression trial (PREMIER)* 457 DM+BP+Albuminuria on perindropril/indapamide Vs Enalapril alone. The combination showed more reduction of SBP+DBP and also 2.5% Vs 6.3% CV events . * The ADVANCE trial in Lancet 2007,370, 829-840 * PREMIER in Hypertension 2003, 41(5) , 1063-1071.

  45. ACE combination • With CCB • Improved BP control • Favourable metabolic effects obvious in ASCOT-BPLA • Counterbalance the reflex increase in sympathetic nervous system induced by CCB which induce renin excretion. • Less vasodilatation oedema induced by CCB • Synergistic reduction of proteinuria and better GFR *( but ACEI+thiazide had more reduction of proteinuria) • Reduce cytokine production . • Less CV events in ACCOMPLISH study • Conclusion :- better combination in diabetic without Protienuria * Bakris GL et al Effect of different ACE inhibitor combination on albuminuria: result of GUARD study. Kidney Int. 2008, 73 , 203-1309

  46. ACE combination • With ARB • ONTARGET- No evidence for reducing CV events, MI, or stroke. • VALIANT – Valsartan compared to captopril in post MI patient the combination provided no further secondary prevention. • ValHeFT and CHARM-ADDED combined ACE with valsartan or candesartan has reduced mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure and also more reduction of proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy. • Conclusion:- good combination in HF and Diabetic nephropathy.

  47. Added therapy • Aspirin • Statin • Vitamins

More Related