1 / 36

Nuclear Physics at a Low Energy Electron-Ion Collider

Jefferson Lab Seminar Friday the 13th, February 2009. Nuclear Physics at a Low Energy Electron-Ion Collider. Charles Earl Hyde Universit é Blaise Pascal Old Dominion University. NSAC 2007 Long Range Plan.

lore
Download Presentation

Nuclear Physics at a Low Energy Electron-Ion Collider

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jefferson Lab Seminar Friday the 13th, February 2009 Nuclear Physics at a Low Energy Electron-Ion Collider Charles Earl Hyde Université Blaise Pascal Old Dominion University

  2. NSAC 2007 Long Range Plan “An Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) with polarized beams has been embraced by the U.S. nuclear science community as embodying the vision for reaching the next QCD frontier. EIC would provide unique capabilities for the study of QCD well beyond those available at existing facilities worldwide and complementary to those planned for the next generation of accelerators in Europe and Asia. We recommend the allocation of resources to develop accelerator and detector technology necessary to lay the foundation for a polarized Electron Ion Collider. The EIC would explore the new QCD frontier of strong color fields in nuclei and precisely image the gluons in the proton.”

  3. Conceptual Design of A Medium Energy Electron-Ion Collider Based on CEBAF A Staged Approach for ELIC S. Bogacz, Ya. Derbenev, R. Ent, G. Krafft, T. Horn, C.Hyde, A. Hutton, F. Klein, P. Nadel-Turonski, A.Thomas, C. Weiss, Y. Zhang Jlab ELIC Study Group A. Afanasev, A. Bogacz, P. Brindza, A. Bruell, L. Cardman, Y. Chao, S. Chattopadhyay, E. Chudakov, P. Degtiarenko, J. Delayen, Ya. Derbenev, R. Ent, P. Evtushenko, A. Freyberger, D. Gaskell, J. Grames, L. Harwood, A. Hutton, C. Hyde, T. Horn, R. Kazimi, G. A. Krafft, F. Klein, R. Li, L. Merminga, J. Musson, P. Nadel-Turonski, M. Poelker, R. Rimmer, Chaivat Tengsirivattana, A. Thomas, H. Wang, C. Weiss, B. Wojtsekhowski, B. Yunn, Y. Zhang

  4. The Partonic Landscape of the Proton Perturbative sea Valence u≈2d Asymmetric sea u≠d _ _ x1u>>d≈g Saturation??

  5. Adding the Spatial DimensionsSpin breaks xy azimuthal symmetry Negative core of neutron Fourier transform in momentum transfer by Asymmetric sea, Pion cloud Perturbative sea Gluon dominated sea, U=d=s Gribov diffusion in b x < 0.1 x ~ 0.3 x ~ 0.8 gives transverse size of quark (parton) with longitud. momentum fraction x logxB bx Where is the Glue? No reason for glue=charge.

  6. Jefferson Lab at 12 GeV and Beyond • Partonic physics in the «Valence» regime x>0.1 • Polarized DIS, SIDIS, Form Factors, DVCS, GPDs … • Many important topics are dominated by «large-x» physics • g1(x), g, transversity Tq(x). • Nuclear Binding (EMC effect) • Momentum Sum Rules, Angular Momentum Sum Rules • Important questions will remain after 12 GeV & COMPASS • Spatial Distribution of Glue (also LG) • Gluons in Nuclei • Full evolution and twist analysis of SIDIS • Full Evolution and twist analysis of Deep Virtual Meson Production

  7. A «Low Energy» Electron-Ion ColliderA new laboratory for large-x physics • Polarized Electron - Proton collisions • s=(k+P)2 ≈ 2k(E+P) • (5 GeV/c e)  (5 GeV/c p) • Luminosity 0.41033 Hz/cm2. • (5 GeV/c e)  (30 GeV/c p) • Luminosity 41033 Hz/cm2. • Electron - Ion Collisions • Momentum per Nucleon in ion beams ZPp/A • Luminosity per nucleus 1/Z2. • Polarized p, d, 3He, 6,7Li • Compact 400 m circumference rings • Superconducting ion ring to achieve 30 GeV/c

  8. Why won’t this physics be done by a high energy collider and/or fixed target? • A high energy collider ke Pp is intrinsically optimized for x ≤ ke/Pp < 0.1 • Resolution, laboratory phase space of final state particles • Transverse momentum spread of high luminosity ion beams is greater than 1/RA ==> Coherent nuclear processes impossible. • Fixed target experiments, e.g. 200 GeV/c muons at COMPASS • Statistics and detector acceptance dominated by low-x • Unpolarized luminosity ≤ 1032 Hz/cm2. • Polarized luminosity 1031 Hz/cm2. • Polarized target DVCS almost impossible • Collider with 5  5 --> 5  30 GeV/c2. (1033 Hz/cm2 ) • A unique machine for a unique physics program.

  9. Glue in the Valence Region • Glue ≈ down quarks (proton) for x>0.1 • TeV scale physics at the LHC requires knowledge of large-x parton structure of proton: x ≥ M/(2PLHC). • Glue accounts for ≈50% of the momentum sum rule of the proton • ≈ 50% of gluon sum rule lies at x>0.1 • Effect of nuclear binding on glue? • No direct measurements of gluons in nuclei • Experimental access to glue in (e,e’) • QCD evolution dF/d(lnQ2) • Open Charm • High PT di-jets • Coherent J/Psi production

  10. J/ Photo-Production J/ Hg,Eg Quality of low energy data is exaggerated. “” from one or two d/dt points.

  11. Exclusive J/ Photo-Production 55 (GeV/c)2. Quasi-real photons *ppJ/ : Spatial image of glue via t-distributions. Statistical Errors on p (2 months)(1033Hz/cm2) • T,L polarized proton beams: • Separation of Hg, Eg. • Correlation of glue with spin 0.2 J/ momentum fraction Gluon Angular Momentum Sum Rule?

  12. Spin Physics: Where’s the Beef?I. G • g(x) from photo-production of high pT di-jets • RHIC-spin • Expectation for g(x)/g(x) peaks for x>0.1

  13. Spin Physics II. g1(x) • SLAC, HERMES s ≤ 80 GeV2. • G from QCD evolution between SLAC & Jlab (s≤24 GeV2).

  14. JLab G (CLAS12 A.Deur Habilitation 2008, Leader, Sidorov and Stamenov, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007)) (G/G) ≈ 0.03

  15. RHIC-Spin region Spin Physics III. Polarized SIDIS (E. Kinney, J. Seele EIC workshop May 2008) The Flavor Asymmetric Sea : Nucleon helicity-dependent PDFs • Large-x requires lower energy 550 (GeV)2 (100 days)(1033) 10250 (GeV)2

  16. Spin Physics IV: Transversity, Collins, & Sivers First Observation of pDIS Collins Effect (HERMES) HERMES Collins Asymmetries in semi- inclusive deep inelastic scattering e+p  e + π + X ~ Transversity (x) x Collins(z) AUT sin(f+fs) Experimental Study of Transversity

  17. Stefan Levorato Transversity 2008, Ferrara Transversity: e.g. COMPASS Preliminary COMPASSCollins Asymmetries for Proton Target vs predictions from Anselmino et al. 20% of data Predictions from global fit to HERMES, Belle and COMPASS-d The action is at large x!

  18. Transversity, SIDIS in a new collider • Polarized luminosity 40-400x COMPASS, HERMES • Large range in s for full study of factorization: • Q2 dependence • Fully differential in xB, pT, z=Eh/ • Lower energy collider options have greatest sensitivity in xB ≥ 0.05 region. • Region of largest signals

  19. Hard Exclusive Meson Production • Need higher energy than Jlab12 to achieve Q2 ≥ 10 GeV2. • Non-diffractive channels (, K, +) dominated by large x (flavor structure) • Rosenbluth LT separations impossible with high energy collider (e.g.10x100). • Need low energy to keep dynamic range in 

  20. Nuclei in a Collider • Gluons in Nuclei • QCD evolution of EMC effect • AZ(,J/) production and gluon GPDs • Quarks in Nuclei • Polarized EMC effect • Polarized SIDIS on nuclei • Spectator tagging • Cleanest access to neutron structure • Calibration measurement on bound protons

  21. Bound Nucleon Structure Functions • Spectator TaggingD(e,e’pS)X • Fixed Target examples • CLAS 12 Polarized, pS>200 MeV/c • BoNuS pS> 70 MeV/c • Collider can tag down to pS≈0, • Resolution limited by intrinsic pT in beam • Quasi-free neutron for pS≈0 • EMC effect of proton in Deuteron • D(e,e’nS)X • ZeroDegree tagging • Neutral/charged, n/ separations • Angular resolution ≈ 1 cm/ 5 m = 2 mr pT = 30 MeV/c at pD= 30 GeV/c Measure structure functions vs pT. • EMC effect of quasi-free p,n in 3He CLAS12 BoNuS

  22. Kinematic reconstruction with tagged protons E = 4.223 GeV W2 = (pn+ q)2 = pnm p nm + 2([MD-Es]n – pn . q) – Q2 ≈ M*2 +2Mn(2- as ) - Q2 Spectator proton’s four momentum: pnμ = -(Es – MD, ps)‏ Light-cone momentum fraction: αs = (Es – psz)/M W2 = M2 +2Mn - Q2 Method Works! - Neutron Elastic and D peaks are very prominent and nicely separated June 3 2008 22 JLab-CLAS-BoNuS

  23. Polarized EMC Effect Cloet,Bentz,Thomas Phys.Lett.B642: 210-217,2006 Polarized 6,7Li beams. 11B?

  24. Nuclear-SIDIS • AZ(e,e’h)X • d(Q2,xB, Eh/,pT2,A) • A-dependent onset of factorization; or • Nuclear filter of “Formation length”; • Jet-propagation • cold baryonic matter (DIS) • boiling vacuum (RHIC, LHC). • Collider opens new domain of target fragmentation • p,, d, He, etc • Evaporation residues A-1, A-2,,, measure temperature of residual system. (E665) HERMES DIS2007

  25. DVCS on proton and coherent DVCS on light nuclei • Tag the coherent recoil nucleus at P’=()P • Compare the matter and charge distributions of light N=Z nuclei • Reconstruct 2 from either recoil or (e,e’) kinematics • Recoil and/or spectator tagging • Quasi Elastic D(e,e’N)N,… • DVCS cross sections constant with s at fixed (Q2,xB), BH falls ~1/s. • Differential sensitivity to Re[DVCS*BH]. • Luminosity is lower than CLAS12 but higher than COMPASS. • Extend JLab12 to higher Q2 (maybe) and lower xB.

  26. Gluons in Nuclei: I. EMC Effect • SLAC E139 • s≤50 GeV2 • 2≤Q2≤10 GeV2.

  27. Gluons in Nuclei: I. EMC Effect • SLAC E139 • s≤50 GeV2 • 2≤Q2≤10 GeV2. • BCDMS Q2 bin • [46,106] GeV2 at x=0.22 • [70,200] GeV2 at x=0.55 • High Luminosity collider 100 ≤ s ≤ 600 GeV2 • Q2 evolution of EMC effect • Glue in nuclei

  28. Gluons in Nuclei: II. gGPDs • A  A J/ • Transverse spatial image of gluons in nuclei • Old question: • What are the proton and neutron distributions in nuclei? • New questions • What are the spatial distributions of u, d, s, glue? • Nuclear Charge Distributions measured in (e,e’). • What is the Nuclear Mass distribution? • N=Z nuclei, dominated by (u+d)/2, g • Low momentum (5-30 Z GeV/c) needed to keep intrinsic Pperp of beam at IP << 1/RA.

  29. Exclusive J/ Photo-Production on Nuclei • Nuclear rates: • Forward amplitude ~A • ‹r2› ≈ B(A) ~A2/3. • Rates on AZ < 16O ≈ 1/2 rate on proton Quasi-real photons *+ AZ AZ+J/ Statistical Errors on p (2 months)(1033Hz/cm2) J/ momentum fraction

  30. MEIC & Staging of ELIC

  31. Conclusions • An electron ion-collider in the s=100 to 600 GeV2 range would have an unprecedented combination of kinematic coverage, luminosity, polarization, and recoil tagging. • Symmetric kinematics are important for coherent processes on nuclei and spectator tagging • Low/medium energy stages enable rich physics program not covered by high-energy collider. • Profound new insight into the source of mass and spin of the visible matter of the universe, including both nucleons and nuclei • Join the simulation/design/R&D effort! • http://www.jlab.org/meic/ • http://web.mit.edu/eicc/Organisation.html

  32. Back-up Slides

  33. Design Parameters

  34. Interaction Region: Simple Optics Mon Dec 01 12:30:09 2008 OptiM - MAIN: - N:\bogacz\Pelican\IR_ion_LR.opt Mon Dec 01 12:26:08 2008 OptiM - MAIN: - N:\bogacz\Pelican\IR_ion_LR.opt 2 2 5 12000 bmax ~ 9 km bmax ~ 9 km BETA_X&Y[m] Size_X[cm] Size_Y[cm] DISP_X&Y[m] b┴* = 5mm b┴* = 5mm s* = 14mm f ~ 7 m f ~ 7 m 0 0 0 0 0 Ax_bet Ay_bet Ax_disp Ay_disp 31.22 0 BETA_X BETA_Y DISP_X DISP_Y 31.22 8 m 8 m • Beta functions • Beam envelopes (σRMS) for εN = 0.2 mm mrad s* = 14mm • Triplet based IR Optics • first FF quad 4 m from the IP • typical quad gradients ~ 12 Tesla/m for 5 GeV/c protons • beam size at FF quads, σRMS ~ 1.6 cm

  35. MEIC and ELIC Costs (2009 M$)

  36. Spin Physics III. Polarized SIDIS (E. Kinney, J. Seele EIC workshop May 2008) 5 GeV e 50 GeV/c protons. (100 day)(1033Hz/cm2) Flavor Asymmetric Sea

More Related