1 / 22

Summary Report to C-II Committee on the 32 nd International Conference on High Energy Physics

Summary Report to C-II Committee on the 32 nd International Conference on High Energy Physics. Hesheng Chen Institute of High energy Physics. Conference Date Conference Venue Committees Attendance Scientific Program Finance Proceedings Summary.

lore
Download Presentation

Summary Report to C-II Committee on the 32 nd International Conference on High Energy Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summary Report to C-II Committee on the 32 nd International Conference on High Energy Physics Hesheng Chen Institute of High energy Physics

  2. Conference Date • Conference Venue • Committees • Attendance • Scientific Program • Finance • Proceedings • Summary

  3. 1. Conference Date August 16 (Monday) to August 22 (Sunday), 2004

  4. 2. Conference Venue Beijing International Convention Center (BICC) No. 8 Beichen East Road Chao Yang District, Beijing 100101 China

  5. 3. Committees For successful organization, the following committees had been created: • the International Advisory Committee, • the Scientific Program Committee • the Local Organizing Committee.

  6. a. International Advisory Committee G.Z. Zhou (Honorary Chair) L. Maiani (CERN) S. Bertolucci (LNF) W. Namkong (POSTECH) H.S. Chen (IHEP, Chair) A.N. Skrinsky (Budker) M. Davier (LAL) M. Tigner (Cornell) J. Dorfan (SLAC) S.C.C. Ting (MIT) E. Iarocci (INFN) Y. Totsuka (KEK) T. Kirk (BNL) A. Wagner (DESY) M. Koshiba (University of Tokyo) M.S. Witherell (FERMILAB) T.D. Lee (Columbia University) C.N. Yang (Stony Brook) V. Luth (C-11)

  7. b.Scientific Program Committee A. Astbury (TRIUMPH) S. Komamiya (Univ. of Tokyo) W. Bardeen (FNAL) Y.P. Kuang (Tsinghua Univ.) R. Cashmore (CERN) W.G. Li (IHEP) K.T. Chao (Peking Univ.) A. Martin (Durham Univ.) H.F. Chen (USTC) G.V. Middelkoop (NIKHEF) P. Dornan (Imperial College) M.E.Peskin (SLAC) D.S. Du (IHEP) P. Roy (TATA) J. Ellis (CERN) H.S. Song (SNU) P. Franzini (Univ. Rome) S.L. Wu (Univ. of Wisconsin) D. Gross (UCSB) D. Hitlin (CALTECH) T. Huang (IHEP) P. Zerwas (DESY) M. Kobayashi (KEK) Z.X. Zhang (ITP)

  8. c. Local Organizing Committee Weiguo Li (Chair) Yueliang Wu Dongsheng Du (Co-chair) Zhizhong Xing Yuqi Chen Tongzhou Xu Shan Jin Chuansong Yu Chuan Liu Xinmin Zhang Caidian Lu Yuanyuan Zhong Jianping Ma Chuanjie Zhu Qing Wang Pengfei Zhuang Yifang Wang Binsong Zou

  9. 4. Attendance • RegisteredAbout 850 people had registered for the conference. • Actual attendanceAbout 730 people actually showed up.Foreign participants: 527Chinese participants: 204

  10. 5. Scientific Program During the selection process, we had solicited opinions from members of the Scientific Program Committee regarding many issues such as the selection of parallel session conveners, plenary session talks, and time allocation to the sessions and the plenary talks. In general, there had been very good input, but in many cases replies came too slow. Topics for plenary sessions had been selected on the basis of the most recent developments in the field with some considerations given to regional balance. The responsibilities for selecting topics for parallel sessions had been largely given to the session conveners who had full authority in organizing topics in his/her session. Details are as below:

  11. a. 13 Parallel Sessions 1. Neutrino Masses & mixings Number of presentations: 22 Conveners: Fumihiko Suekane (Tohoku Univ.) Andrea Romanino (CERN) Zhizhong Xing (IHEP) 2. Quark matter & heavy ion collisions Number of presentations: 16 Conveners: Nu Xu (LBNL, Ep.) Ralf Rapp (Texas A&M) 3. Particle astrophysics & cosmology Number of presentations: 18 Conveners: Slava Mukhanov (Univ. Muenchen) Pierre Binetruy ( Orsay) Roberto Battiston (INFN) 4. Electroweak Physics Number of presentations: 27 Conveners: Marcela Carena (FNAL) Martin Grunewald (Dublin, L3) Jin Shan (IHEP)

  12. a. 13 Parallel Sessions 5. QCD hard interactions Number of presentations: 30 Conveners: E.-C.Aschenauer (DESY) Yuanning Gao (Tsinghua Univ.) 6. QCD soft interactions Number of presentations: 24 Conveners: Markus Diehl (Desy) Zhiqing Zhang (Orsay) 7. Computational quantum field theory Number of presentations: 8 Conveners: Zvi Bern (UCLA) Jonathan Flynn (UK) Chuan Liu(Peking Univ.) 8. CP Violation ,Rare Kaon Decay & CKM Number of presentations: 36 Conveners: C.S.Kim (Yonsei Univ.) G.Isidori (INFN) James D. Olsen (Princeton Univ.)

  13. a. 13 Parallel Sessions 9. R&D for future accelerator & detector Number of presentations: 20 Conveners: S. Komamiya (Tokyo Univ.) Zhi-Yuan Guo (IHEP) Chris Adolphsen (SLAC) 10. Hadron spectroscopy & exotics Number of presentations: 29 Conveners: E.Klempt (Bonn Univ.) Bingsong Zou (IHEP) 11. Heavy quark mesons & baryons Number of presentations: 39 Conveners: Dan Pirjol (MIT) Stefano Giagu W. S. Hou (NTU) 12. Beyond the standard model Number of presentations: 31 Conveners: Georg Weiglein (Durham) Yueliang Wu (ITP)Teruki Kamon (Texas A&M) 13. String theory Number of presentations: 5 Conveners: Piljin Yi (KIAS) Miao Li (ITP) Micha Berkooz (Weizmann)

  14. b. 26 Plenary Talks 1.Recent results of CP violation in B decays 2.Recent results of B decays 3. Rare K decays and CP,CPT violation 4. CKM and CP violation 5. Charm physics 6. Electroweak physics 7. New results for top and Higgs (Tevatron) 8. New results for heavy flavor and QCD tests (Tevatron) 9. Searching for new physics 10. Physics at Linear colliders 11. Quark matter at high density/temperature 12. Hadron Spectroscopy-an overview (theory) 13. New results on hadron spectroscopy (experiment)

  15. b. 26 Plenary Talks 14. Review of heavy quark physics 15. Neutrino physics (accelerator based experiments) 16. Neutrino physics (non-accelerator based experiments) 17. Neutrino physics (theory) 18. QCD at high energy at HERA 19. QCD review (theory) 20. Recent results on lattice calculations 21. Particle astrophysics & cosmology 22. Strings, branes and extra dimensions 23. Future accelerators 24. Future detectors 25. Reports by various committees 26. Conference Summary

  16. c. Posters We had organized both lab and individual posters. The following 19 labs joined the lab poster session: ANL BNL CCLRC CERN DAPNIA DESY FNAL IHEP KAMIOKANDE KEK KLOE LAL LBNL LEPP LNGS NOVERSBIRSK PLS SLAC TRIUMF We solicited through session conveners, but only a few individuals participated.

  17. 6. Finance a. IncomeThe registration fee was a little less than 200,000 USD. The financial support from various sources was about 45,000 USD. IUPAP 14,500 USD CAS 10,000 USD NSFC 20,000 USD CPS 1,200 USDTotal income: 245,700 USD

  18. 6. Finance b. OutlayConference rooms 6,000 / day x 3 days = 18,000 USD8,000/day x 3 days = 24,000USDProceedings 38 x 900 copies = 34,200 USDReception 25 x 900 persons = 22,500 USDBanquet 45 x 1,000 persons = 45,000 USDTea breaks 2.5 x 900 x 12 = 27,000 USDConference bag 14$ x 1000 = 14,000$Transportation 11,000$

  19. 6. Finance Office Equipments (mainly for computers and the registration room) 15,000 USD Support to students and participants from developing countries 35,000 USD(China Pakistan Russia Argentina Czech Vietnam Ukraine Serbia and Montenegro India Korea Russia) Meeting support 5,000USD(Including two C-11 meetings, ICFA, ILCSC one day, Interactions Collaboration two full days) Total outlay: 250,700 USD In addition to pay the deficit of 5000 USD, IHEP also supported a large amount of manpower, postages, office supply in total about 12,000 USD.

  20. 6. Finance The conference should have more income, and the relatively larger expenditure was mainly due to 1) Number of people showing up was much less than expected, and yet most contracts had been signed on the basis of 900 or 1000 people, proceedings and the banquet for instance, 2) We had supported too many local students and participants from poor local institutions.

  21. 7. Proceedings Proceedings (two volumes) were contracted to WSP, Singapore and are now ready and are being distributed.

  22. 8. Summary The conference had been very successful in that it had been carried out in full conformity with the IUPAP values and principles, through the conference scientific ideas had been exchanged among the participants, friendship and cooperation had been strengthened. Hereby I would like to be on behalf of the host institution to express my thanks to all the sponsors and everybody here who made it available for us to host ICHEP’04.

More Related