1 / 25

Full Market Impact: Measuring Impact of Private-sector Health Projects

Full Market Impact: Measuring Impact of Private-sector Health Projects. AED’s N-MARC Project Nepal Nadra Franklin March 31, 2009.

loring
Download Presentation

Full Market Impact: Measuring Impact of Private-sector Health Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Full Market Impact: Measuring Impact of Private-sector Health Projects AED’s N-MARC Project Nepal Nadra Franklin March 31, 2009

  2. GoalExpand the depth, reach, and impact of Family Planning/Reproductive Health, MCH, and HIV/AIDS prevention products and services among low socio-economic populations through sustainable social marketing and social franchising programs Nepal Social Marketing & Franchising Project: AIDS, Reproductive Health, and Child Survival2006-2009

  3. A New Model of Private Sector Health Initiative - Full Market Impact™ • Social marketing approach to achieve “total market” development for essential healthcare products and services, coupled with sustainable health impact • Multiple partners from the private commercial sector, NGOs, public sector and civil society to increase the practice of healthy behaviors and generate/fulfill demand for an affordable and accessible range of “public health” products and services • Four P’s of marketing, (product/supply, price/affordability, place/distribution, and promotion/demand and appropriate use) • Three primary outcomes – equity, commercial viability, and sustainable public health impact • Facilitator and broker, steward of donor investment

  4. N-MARC’s Program Strategy • Build on 30 years of USAID/Nepal’s investment in social marketing in Nepal • Conduct generic communication campaigns to build ‘total market’ demand for products • Enhance independence of social marketing organizations and local ownership

  5. Commercial-Sector Partnerships • Matching funds • Joint-risk, joint-reward approach • 1 to 1 matching ratio (or higher ratio favoring USAID) • Partners responsible for own product procurement • Stimulates commercial-sector investment • Technical assistance • Sensitization to public health issues in Nepal • Refining and developing marketing strategies • Brand rationalization/new products • Market research (e.g. Household behavioral surveys, GIS mapping) • Support local partners’ implementation

  6. Key Products and Services N-MARC invests in subsidized and fully-priced locally owned brands HIV/AIDSPrevention • Male condoms • Latex female condom • Oral contraceptives • Injectable contraceptives • Long-term methods (IUD and Norplant) • Emergency contraceptive pills Family Planning/ Reproductive Health • Clean delivery kits • Oral rehydration salts • POU chlorine solution Maternal & Child Health

  7. Evaluation Theory Based on Program Theory: Full Market Impact (FMI) • Measure the program model • 7 results areas relate to intervention design • 7 results areas associated with specific indicators • FMI outcome is Impact • Prospective evaluation design • Refers to program model and intervention design • Developed at outset of program • Refined in real-time as program design is refined and revised

  8. Result Area1: Improved Supply • Increased production capacity and output • Creating strong links between manufacturers and distributors • Number and percentage of partners utilizing fully developed marketing plans, including market segmentation strategy to facilitate development of sustainable business relationships between manufacturers and distributors (brand building, planning etc) • Providing technical support to expand manufacturing capacity and quality • Number of partners trained in development and implementation of social marketing communication strategies to increase capacity of local partners to design, implement and manage state-of-the-art social marketing and social franchise programs • Expansion of the number of outlets Improved stock management and distribution system

  9. Result Area 2: Increased Demand • Generic demand creation campaigns based on extensive research • Increased equity to ensure equal demand and access (Household coverage rates as high or higher among low-income and high risk groups) • Private Market Size per product (Present Sales) • Commercial Market Size per product (Present Sales) • Percent increase in commercial sector market share per product or service (difference between baseline and present sales)

  10. Result Area 3: Improved Technologies • Making cutting-edge technology and new products accessible to all manufacturers • Bringing new products to the attention of manufacturers and then to consumers • Latex female condom • Zinc treatment for diarrhea

  11. Result Area 4: Increased Distribution • Franchise opportunities and targeted subsidy via commercial sector, vested party or additional donor • Franchising products through training • Voucher schemes • Coverage and reach • More outlets and enhanced stock management

  12. Result Area 5: Efficiency • Maximizing public health impact through efficient investment • Resources leveraged by N-MARC project • Number and % of initiatives (e.g. research and communication) that include a minimal level of multi-sectoral representation • Efficiency ratio of using donor resources

  13. Result Area 6: Access • Creating a sustainable marketplace for consumers at a variety of price-points • Coverage per product distributed for target population in geographically-defined populated areas • Access saturation index - monitor variations on the levels of coverage and access for enhanced program management, with the ultimate goal of increasing both coverage access at smaller geographically-defined areas and distances to maintain the focus on realizing public health impact

  14. Result Area 7: Sustainability • Creating a sustainable business model among manufacturers, suppliers and their distributors to serve long-term consumer needs • Increased number of brands, partners, with steadily increasing investment in market development by commercial sector • Establishment of distribution networks and promotional capacity at the regional and country levels that are not dependant on any donor support beyond project • Sustainability indicator

  15. Family Planning/Reproductive Health Results (2007-2008)

  16. HIV/AIDS Results (2007-2008)

  17. Results: Increased Demand and Access Individual Sales Performance of commercial partners Increased Geographic Coverage

  18. Results: Sustainability Private sector market size has increased by 20% since the intervention was initiated, resulting in greater commercial sector role Source: ACNielsen, Retail Market Audit

  19. Results: Efficiency Increased investment from commercial sector Period: August 2007-July 2008

  20. Full Market Impact • Creating a sustainable market for maximum public health impact through improved access, sustainability and consumer-focused efficient use of funds • Three main outcomes – equity, commercial viability, and public health impact • Calculate FMI Index • Model births averted • Model HIV infections averted

  21. Implications: Replicability • Key results areas can be applied to multiple interventions beyond private sector partnership development models • Results derived from multiple methods and approaches applied throughout project performance period • Translate FMI to non private-sector approaches

  22. Implications: Data Quality • Triangulation of data from household surveys, retail audits, sales reports, GIS mapping, qualitative inquiry • Private-sector model results in nation-wide intervention and agnostic “selection” of program areas • Inability to identify “control” areas because of model’s reach and ethical concerns of not providing the intervention

  23. Is this Impact? • Apply models to measure public health impact using program data – cases averted • Define program context that potentially contributed to and stalled program implementation over the three-year project period – attribution and speeding up secular change • Estimate costs of tracking results to measure impact – making budgetary allocations

More Related