1 / 19

Help for Choke Points in Pre-Calculus (Grades 10 - 14) May 6, 2004

Wisconsin Mathematics Council. Help for Choke Points in Pre-Calculus (Grades 10 - 14) May 6, 2004. Marty Schuh, mschuh@uwc.edu Hal Schlais, hschlais@uwsa.edu. Support. These activities are supported by: A National Science Foundation Proof of Concept Grant: DUE-0231508

loring
Download Presentation

Help for Choke Points in Pre-Calculus (Grades 10 - 14) May 6, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Wisconsin Mathematics Council Help for Choke Points in Pre-Calculus (Grades 10 - 14) May 6, 2004 Marty Schuh, mschuh@uwc.edu Hal Schlais, hschlais@uwsa.edu

  2. Support These activities are supported by: • A National Science Foundation Proof of Concept Grant: DUE-0231508 • A Grant from the University of Wisconsin System – Learning Technology Development Council

  3. Goals This project intended to produce: • pre-calculus modules to target conceptual hurdles • a prototypical process faculty can use for finding or creating instructional materials using SCOs • a prototypical collection of SCOs identified from existing precalculus content on the web • case studies of each of the instructional participants

  4. Participants PI: Hal Schlais, Director of Learning Technology Development - UW System Co-PIs: Robert Hoar, UW-La Crosse Tom Peneski, UW-Colleges (Sheboygan) Team: Jeff Baggett, UW-La Crosse Karl Kattchee, UW-La Crosse Patricia Nelson, UW-La Crosse Terry Nyman, UW-Colleges (Fox Valley) Marty Schuh, UW-Colleges (Manitowoc) Paul A. Sundheim, UW-Colleges (Waukesha)

  5. Fast Timeline • Funding and team selection began in June of 2003 • Team attended “SCO-Days” • Materials found and assembled in July and August • New (fall) team members briefed • Materials “tested” in fall classrooms • Additional materials developed in fall • Materials and process are assessed

  6. Module Building Process • Faculty identify “choke points” in pre-calculus • Search digital libraries and other sources for “assets” related to the choke point • Eisenhower National Clearinghouse • MERLOT • Others • Augment found assets with additional content to create a common look for modules called Shareable Content Objects (SCOs) • SCOs to be placed in a repository • Used for instruction in a number of ways

  7. Choke Points UW Colleges • Log Properties • Algebraic manipulation of logs and exponential equations • Horizontal stretching and periodicity UW-La Crosse • Right triangle vs unit circle trig • Radians vs Degrees • Trig identities Open • Inverse Concept

  8. Finding Assets • Goal was to utilize existing learning objects to build Sharable Content Objects to address pre-calculus choke points • Observations • lots of material available on the web • rarely exactly what you want • often not public domain, difficult to modify, or incompatible • best search tool was Google

  9. The Modules • The instructional design (TCP): • Textual: background mathematics necessary to understand the central concept • Conceptual: gizmo + investigations to learn about a particular concept • Practical: self assessment or practice section T C P

  10. Repository www.compute.uwlax.edu/precalc

  11. An example

  12. Example Module

  13. Example Module

  14. LMS The SCO’s found and/or created by the team were placed into the Desire2Learn Learning Management System. Tracking and assessment features of D2L were utilized in assessing student usage.

  15. Observations • One of the goals was to define a process by which the average math instructor could assemble and use a module • Building a module around existing gizmos can be done with only a little knowledge of an HTML editor • Building gizmos is technically demanding • An open-source gizmo repository would help

  16. Collaboration • There are benefits to collaboration • Working with others within the system • Access to experts • There are challenges too • Our team was spread out • Face-to-face meetings • Weekly conference calls • Email • Desire2Learn

  17. New Look • More Readable • Easier Navigation • Less Content per Page • Input from Instructional Designer

  18. Future Plans • Development of “How-to” module • Expansion beyond pre-calculus • Expansion beyond mathematics • Develop a system wide Repository • Ensure appropriate Standards are maintained • Open Source (Editable) • Sharable (Platform/Server independent/LMS friendly) • Properly “tagged” (Make them easy to find) • (Nearly) Self Contained www.compute.uwlax.edu/precalc

More Related