1 / 12

Metadata Guidelines for the Mountain West Digital Library: Who, What, Where, When, Why?

Metadata Guidelines for the Mountain West Digital Library: Who, What, Where, When, Why?. CONTENTdm Users Group Meeting July 23, 2007 Portland, Oregon Vicki Toy Smith University of Nevada, Reno. Metadata Guidelines. Project completion: 2006

loring
Download Presentation

Metadata Guidelines for the Mountain West Digital Library: Who, What, Where, When, Why?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Metadata Guidelines for the Mountain West Digital Library:Who, What, Where, When, Why? CONTENTdm Users Group Meeting July 23, 2007 Portland, Oregon Vicki Toy Smith University of Nevada, Reno

  2. Metadata Guidelines • Project completion: 2006 • Guidelines were developed by the Utah Academic Library Consortium Task Force (UALC’s Cataloging & Digitization Committees) • Goal: Improving metadata in the Mountain West Digital Library • UALC member institutions had loosely followed the CDP (Collaborative Digitization Project) Dublin Core Metadata Best Practices guidelines

  3. A need for best practices • Implementation of the guidelines across various UALC institutions was inconsistent • CDP best practices guidelines lacked good working examples for users to implement metadata guidelines • In the initial meeting between the Cataloging and Digitization Committees, general problems with the Mountain West Digital Library’s (MWDL’s) metadata were discussed • Task force examined differences between metadata & traditional cataloging

  4. Dublin Core Metadata • A universal metadata schema • No consistency across projects using Dublin Core • Documentation is not well-defined • Intended for use by non-catalogers & specialists • No MARC tags used with Dublin Core metadata • Most libraries in our consortia use CDP Metadata Best Practices guidelines for CONTENTdm projects • CDP Guidelines Version 2.1.1 (September 2006): www.cdpheritage.org/cdp/documents/CDPDCMBP.pdfLinked from:www.cdpheritage.org/cdp/workingGroups/metadata/index.cfm/

  5. Mountain West Digital Library (MWDL) • The Mountain West Digital Library is a consortium of digital collections from universities, public libraries, museums in Utah, Nevada, and Idaho • Some institutions have collections on the Mountain West Digital Library (MWDL) website. • Other institutions host their own collections:University of Utah, BYU, Utah State University, Southern Utah University, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, & University of Nevada, Reno, Weber State University, & Utah State Archives • These digital libraries are aggregated in a single, searchable index hosted at the University of Utah: www.mwdl.org/ • In addition, some UALC partner institutions have collections featured on the MWDL website • Partner institutions include: Murray City Library, Topaz Museum, Uintah County Library, Utah State Historical Society

  6. Issues confronting the Task Force • Differences between metadata and traditional cataloging were examined • Constructing metadata is different than building a catalog • However, structured discipline used in cataloging could improve the consistency of the MWDL metadata

  7. Task Force Members • Molly Beisler – University of Nevada, Reno • Randy Christensen – Southern Utah University • John Herbert – University of Utah • Kathy Rankin – University of Nevada, Las Vegas • Vicki Toy Smith – University of Nevada, Reno • Mary Taylor – University of Nevada, Reno • Cheryl Walters – Utah State University • Kayla Willey (contributed early) – BYU • Kathryn Etcheverria – (contributed later) University of Nevada, Reno

  8. Mission of the Task Force • GOAL: Development of metadata examples for digital library item types • CDP Dublin Core Metadata Best Practices guidelines used • However, examples were tailored for the MWDL and CONTENTdm digital asset management software

  9. Examples developed by task force members • Postcard • Journal article • Diary • Dissertation • Compound object (Book, Individual Page, Newspaper Issue, Newspaper Page, Newspaper article) • Audio • Film/Video • Photograph • Ephemera (Show program) • Artwork • Map • Architectural/Technical Drawings • Letter

  10. Metadata Guidelines • Following our discussions, we decided to write a document that contained the 14 types of metadata examples • These examples explained how to structure the metadata (which was developed for a specific item type) • Resulting set of examples, plus other considerations and recommendations are presented on the MWDL web site • The last link on the “about” page of the MWDL web site contains the guidelines completed in 2006: www.lib.utah.edu/digital/collections/mwdl/about.html/ • Direct link to the file: www.lib.utah.edu/digital/collections/mwdl/metadata_MWDL2006.pdf Finalized Metadata Examples

  11. Further Development • With knowledge and experience with metadata and aggregations the document will undergo revisions. • However, the present document should assist in the development of today’s digital libraries.

  12. Thank you! Vicki Toy Smith, Principal Cataloger University of Nevada, Reno vicki@unr.edu www2.library.unr.edu/vicki/

More Related