1 / 19

Anand Rangarajan Yale University

Explore Anand Rangarajan's dual-aspect panpsychist critique of emergentist, quantum, and Wilber's holonic theories of consciousness. Delve into logical supervenience, liberal naturalism, receptivity, spacetime frames, and ontology/epistemology dynamics.

losh
Download Presentation

Anand Rangarajan Yale University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Dual-Aspect Panpsychist Critique of Emergentist, Quantum and Wilber’s Holonic Theories of Consciousness Anand Rangarajan Yale University Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  2. Logical Supervenience • Almost everything is logically supervenient on the physical. • Exceptions are: • Experience • Physical laws • Awareness (locus of self) • Causal closure of physical world renders experience epiphenomenal. • Introduce Gregg Rosenberg’s dual-aspect panpsychist “LiberalNaturalism” approach. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  3. Rosenberg’s Liberal Naturalism Experience and Causation • Physical facts do not entail experiential facts. • From (1), experience is non-physical. • Physical explanations are a complete explanation of causation. [Denied here.] • From (2) and (3), experience lies outside the causal structure and is irrelevant. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  4. Rosenberg’s Liberal Naturalism A New Metaphysics of Causation • Humean regularity theories of causation demolished. • Receptivity: degree of sensitivity to other effective states. • Receptivity is not logically supervenient on the physical. • Visualized as a directed graph. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  5. Rosenberg’s Liberal Naturalism Receptivity and Spacetime • Direction of time supervenes on asymmetric receptive connections. • Causality condition on locality and not a locality condition on causality. • Roughly visualized as a Markov chain. : Receptive prop. : Effective prop. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  6. Rosenberg’s Liberal Naturalism Avatars in a “real” CG world Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  7. Rosenberg’s Liberal Naturalism Carrier theory of causation • Receptive and effective properties form a compositional circularity. • Contrastive circularities in any system have to be carried by external carriers. • Good example is user semantics in GUIs. • Contrasts in physics are not carried by anything extrinsic to physics. • Phenomenal qualities carry effective properties. • Experiencing of qualities carries receptive connections. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  8. Rosenberg’s Liberal Naturalism Phenomenal Individuals • Phenomenal individuals carry the nomic content of natural individuals. • Every natural individual is a phenomenal individual. • Individuals can contain other individuals. • Such containment implies multiple spacetime reference frames. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  9. Rosenberg’s Liberal Naturalism Hierarchical Spacetime Frames • Each individual has own spacetime frame of reference. • Each spacetime built up from asynchronous receptive connections. • Compositional hierarchy of individuals may be separated into same level versus different levels. • Overlapping spacetimes at same level can cohere. • Possibility spaces of higher levels under constrained by lower levels. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  10. Rosenberg’s Liberal Naturalism Ontology & Epistemology • Directed graph of receptive connections needed in physics. • Duality of effective and receptive properties. • Causation and spacetime placed in the framework of the directed graph. • Receptive connections epistemically opaque but ontologically clear. • Experience is epistemically clear but ontologically opaque. • Clean duality exploited in this approach. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  11. Critique of Wilber’s holonic approach Twenty Tenets • Reality not composed of things or processes, but of holons. • Insufficient distinction made between emergent functional properties and natural individuals. • Holons display self-preservation, self-adaptation, self-transcendence and self-dissolution. • Biology driven bias. • Holons emerge. • Holons emerge holarchically. • One-dimensional, temporal emergence. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  12. Critique of Wilber’s holonic approach Twenty tenets (contd.) • Each emergent holon transcends and includes its predecessors. • One-dimensional (see above). • The lower sets the possibilities for the higher, the higher sets the probabilities of the lower. • No explanation of the distinction between possibility and probability. • Number of levels in a hierarchy – depth. Number of holons on a given level – span. • Hierarchies can be tangled. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  13. Critique of Wilber’s holonic approach Twenty tenets (contd.) • Each successive level of evolution produces greater depth and less span. • Evolution is irrelevant. • Greater the depth of the holon, greater the degree of consciousness. • Consciousness undefined. • Destroy any type of holon and you will destroy all of the holons above it and none of the holons below it. • Great Goddess destroyed when universe is destroyed? Modification: If universe never existed, Goddess destroyed. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  14. Critique of Wilber’s holonic approach Twenty tenets (contd.) • Holoarchies coevolve. • Evolution is irrelevant. • Micro is in relational exchange with the macro at all levels. • Fine. Evolution has • Directionality, • Increasing complexity, • Increasing differentiation/integration, • Increasing organization/structuration, • Increasing autonomy, and • Increasing telos. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  15. Critique of Wilber’s holonic approach Twenty tenets (contd.) • Every holon issues an IOU to the Kosmos. • All IOUs are redeemed in emptiness (shunyata). • Mysticism bracketed out. Capsule summary: Functional properties of evolution and self-organization synthesized together with qualia. Does not take into account supervenience relations. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  16. Critique of Wilber’s holonic approach Overall critique • Critical temporal issues implicit in twenty tenets. • Over-reliance on evolution and self-organization as twenty tenets base. • Supervenience relations not mentioned. • Hierarchies not constructed using receptive and effective properties. • Emergence linked to time. “The manifest All-Unity evolves as All-Form, the summit application of the twenty tenets.” Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  17. Critique of emergentist approach Evolution and self-organization • Self-organization and selection: cornerstone of emergentist approach. • Direction of time assumed as well as single spacetime. • Evolution only selects functional properties. • Self-organization does not distinguish between emergent functional properties and natural individuals. • No fundamental understanding of causation. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  18. Critique of Quantum Approaches Quantum Theory and Experience • Several unique features of QM. • Selection from a space of possibilities (measurement problem.) • EPR non-locality. • Bose-Einstein “holistic” condensates. • Interpretation of wave function. • Projection operators performing selection (Stapp). • Orch OR non-computational collapse of wave function (Hameroff and Penrose). • Other approaches (Albert, Squires, Goswami, Lockwood, Hodgson, Bohm). Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

  19. Critique of Quantum Approaches Overall Critique • Chalmers: “Even given a nonlocal, physical process, it remains logically possible that the process could take place in the absence of consciousness.” • Projection operators, non-local and non-computational processes conceived in functional terms. • Quantum measurement problem and non-locality in EPR: clues to an asynchronous model? • Asynchronous causation has potential to unite quantum theory and general relativity. Anand Rangarajan. URL:http://noodle.med.yale.edu/anand/profile.html

More Related