E N D
1. Disproportionality, School Discipline and Academic Achievement Rob Horner
University of Oregon
www.pbis.org www.uoecs.org
2. Goals Document the role of discipline disproportionality at multiple levels:
(a) referrals to the office,
(b) administrative decisions once a student is in the office.
Describe a role for school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports
Link discipline systems, academic achievement, disproportionality
3. The Challenge Increased diversity of students entering schools across the nation
Differences in culture across the teacher, administrator and student
Economic risk factors. Acknowledging the role of poverty, but not using it as an excuse.
4. Two levels of disproportionality in discipline systems Likelihood of referral to the office
Likelihood of a “consequence” that results in loss of educational minutes.
NOTE: The single strongest predictor of academic gains is the number of minutes of effective academic engagement.
Removing a student from school is a serious decision.
5. Two levels of disproportionality in discipline systems Race is not Neutral: Disproportionality in School DisciplineRussell Skiba, Robert H. Horner, Choong-Geun Chung Karega Rausch, , Seth L. May, and Tary Tobin
In press: Journal of School Psychology
Analysis of office discipline referral data from the school-wide information system (SWIS)
436 elementary and middle schools
205,932 students who received office discipline referrals
Referrals organized by student ethnicity, type of problem behavior, and administrative decision.
6. Two levels of disproportionality in discipline systems First Finding: Students from Hispanic/Latino and African American backgrounds were more likely to be sent to the office than their white peers.
Logistic regression, odds ratios
(1.0 = same ; >1.0 = more likely; < 1.0 = less likely)
7. Elementary Schools:Compare proportion of students enrolled to proportion of students with an ODR
8. Middle Schools:Compare proportion of students enrolled to proportion of students with an ODR
9. Two levels of disproportionality in discipline systems Second Finding: If students from Hispanic/Latino or African American backgrounds were sent to the office, they were more likely than white students to receive a consequence that resulted in their being removed from school (suspension/expulsion)
Odds Ratio for Consequence for all ODRs
10. Elementary Schools:Likelihood of out of school suspension or expulsion compared to white students (1.0 = equal).
11. Middle Schools:Likelihood of out of school suspension or expulsion compared to white students (1.0 = equal).
12. Moving from defining the problem to defining solutions No simple fix.
The issues of disproportionality likely lie in multiple issues and deep societal challenges.
13. © Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008 Sobering Observation
14. School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Build a continuum of supports that begins with the whole school and extends to intensive, wraparound support for individual students and their families.
15. What is School-wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports? School-wide PBIS is:
A framework for establishing the practices and systems needed to achieve the social culture and behavioral supports required for a school to be an effective learning environment for all students.
Evidence-based features of SWPBIS
Prevention
Define and teach positive social expectations
Acknowledge positive behavior
Arrange consistent consequences for problem behavior
On-going collection and use of data for decision-making
Continuum of intensive, individual intervention supports.
Implementation of the systems that support effective practices
18. Schools adopting SWPBIS by year
19. SWPBIS in 13,331 schools 8/10’
20. Percentage of Schools using SWPBIS by State
21. Practical steps that schools can do to address discipline disproportionality.
Establish a predictable, consistent, positive and safe school-wide culture by teaching school-wide behavioral expectations
Collect and use discipline data disaggregated by ethnicity/race. (Report monthly or quarterly… not just annually)
Provide staff with the opportunity for orientation to the role of culture in discipline decision-making.
Teach with precision, intensity and effect
Acknowledge appropriate behavior regularly
Skiba et al., In press, Vincent et al., In press, Tobin & Vincent In press
Moving from defining the problem to defining solutions
23. Linking Behavior Support and Academic Achievement
24. North CarolinaPositive Behavior Interventions & Support Initiative
February 2009
Heather R. Reynolds
NC Department of Public Instruction
Bob Algozzine
Behavior and Reading Improvement Center
http://www.dpi.state.nc.us/positivebehavior/
25. North CarolinaPositive Behavior Intervention & Support Initiative : 2010
26. North CarolinaPositive Behavior Support Initiative
27. Suspensions per 100 students
28. Cedar Creek Middle SchoolFranklin County, North Carolina
29. North CarolinaPositive Behavior Support Initiative
30.
Steve Goodman
sgoodman@oaisd.org
www.cenmi.org/miblsi
31. Participating Schools 512 schools = approximately 15% of all schools in Michigan512 schools = approximately 15% of all schools in Michigan
32. Average Major Discipline Referral per 100 Students by Cohort
34. Percent of Students at DIBELS Intensive Level across year by Cohort
35. Impact of PBIS on Teachers
36. PBIS and Discipline Disproportionality If schools adopt school-wide PBIS do they demonstrate improved performance for children at risk for discipline disproportionality?
37. Preliminary Evidence:When PBIS is linked to reduction in ODRs does reduction occur for students from all ethnic groups?
38. Preliminary Evidence:When PBIS is linked to reduction in ODRs does reduction occur for students from all ethnic groups?
39. Preliminary Evidence:Illinois OSS for school using PBIS and beginning adoption
40. One Illinois Elementary School:Out of School Suspensions before and after SWPBIS
41. Summary One piece of an effective response to discipline disproportionality will be defining effective procedures for establishing a WHOLE SCHOOL social culture that is positive, predictable, consistent and safe.
Supporting students cannot occur without supporting families, staff, and administrators.
Be brave about making a start. Do not expect ONE solution that will work everywhere.