130 likes | 414 Views
Intercultural Communication. Kiyoko Sueda June 16, 2009. A. Group presentations.
E N D
Intercultural Communication Kiyoko Sueda June 16, 2009
A. Group presentations • 1. Based on the reading materials, select a topic and make a group presentation. You can make a critical analysis of what you have learned in class or from the reading materials, or you can relate the theories you have learned to your daily life and experiences. e.g. -What is KY(kuuki yomenai)? -Are Japanese really collecitivists? -A cultural minority in Japan.
2. Make a group consisting of 5 or 6 persons, and the total time allowed for each group is 20 minutes. The presentation time cannot be changed based on the number of people in the group. • 3. The form of the presentation is flexible, but everyone in the group should contribute to the project.
4. For your presentation, you can use equipment, such as a PC (Windows XP), DVD, or VHS. Your group leader has to let Sueda know which equipment you would like to use. • 5. You can use Sueda’s PC (the one I have at the office is Windows XP) for powerpoint slides. You are welcome to use it, but you need to save your document on your own USB and format it for XP.
6. Presentation will be made on the following dates: June 23, June 30, July 7 and July 14. • 7. As a member of the audience, you are expected to evaluate your classmates’ presentations. • 8. As a presenter, you are expected to evaluate your own performance.
B. Final paper • Based on your group presentation, you are expected to submit a final paper individually to Kyomuka (Building #8 on the 1st floor). The due date of the paper is from July 21st to 23rd . (Please double check with Kyomuka’s information to be released on June 24th) • 2. The content of the paper should include: (1) what you have learned academically from the project; and (2) how well your group collaborated, and reasons why your group collaborated well or not. • 3. The paper should be typed (double-spaced=1.5) and from 1 to 2 pages in length.
Presentation Schedule • June 23 • Group 1 Ayon, Marmo、東郷 今井 浅井 森崎 • Group 2 Dinoffria, Quintana、内山 宇野 今林 山田 • Group 3 Fowler, Araki、梶川 浦川 加藤綾 山本 • Group 4 Paxton, 金、布田 加藤そ 加藤雄 長澤
June 30 • Group 5 Kogan 喬 江川 門岡 金子 南竹 • Group 6 Tinkham, Crawley 河口 川西 黒石 森田 • Group 7 Barnard 胡 清水 小菅 小西 • Group 8 Ganbold Ruby 本山 太刀川 佐藤
July 7 • Group 9 Calzada, Suzuka 山口 田中 杉山 • Group 10 Ginn, Delaterre 湯浅 田村 積 • Group 11&12 Nomura 冨岡 鶴巻 • Li, 魏, 宮本 友野 中神
July 14 • Group 13 Eysmont, Lam 塚田 沼田 楢崎 • Group 14 歐、盧 石崎 能勢 福岡 • Group 15 Gregory, 神野 伊藤 古川 福島 • Group 16 黄、寶納、井上 三矢 村上
Group Presentation Self Evaluation Sheet Strongly agree Strongly disagree • A. The content is relevant to the reading. 5 4 3 2 1 • B. The analysis is good. 5 4 3 2 1 • C. The presentation is easy to understand.5 4 3 2 1 • D. The delivery is good. 5 4 3 2 1 • (e.g., eye contact, voice, speed) • E. The teamwork is good. 5 4 3 2 1 • F. You contributed to this presentation. 5 4 3 2 1 • *How often did you meet with your group members and prepared for the presentation? • (e.g., Twice besides class period) • *Who( including you) contributed most for this presentation? • Choose one item out of A~F above that the group is good about. ( ) • * Choose one item out of A~E above that the group needs to improve.( ) • * Comments if any
Group Presentation Evaluation Sheet • Group( ) • 5:Strongly agree 1: Strongly disagree • A. The content is relevant to the reading. 5 4 3 2 1 • B. Their analysis is good. 5 4 3 2 1 • C. The presentation is easy to understand. 5 4 3 2 1 • D. The delivery is good. 5 4 3 2 1 • (e.g., eye contact, voice, speed) • E. The teamwork is good. 5 4 3 2 1 • Recommendations • Choose one item out of A~E above that the group needs to improve ( ) • Others • Comments if any
Preparation • Please proceed with the project with your group mates. • You can do whatever you need to do (e.g., doing library research) as far as you come back by 12:00. • Use time wisely. • The leaders or delegated members have to fill out the sheet and submit it to the instructor.