1 / 17

ZS review: impedance

ZS review: impedance . B. Salvant Many thanks to B. Bahlan , J. Borburgh, K. Cornelis. Agenda. Previous RF measurements Attempts to simulate the complex ZS geometry Replacing the wires with a solid on a simplified model Studying the full geometry Frequency domain simulations

love
Download Presentation

ZS review: impedance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ZS review: impedance B. Salvant Many thanks to B. Bahlan, J. Borburgh, K. Cornelis

  2. Agenda • Previous RF measurements • Attempts to simulate the complex ZS geometry • Replacing the wires with a solid on a simplified model • Studying the full geometry • Frequency domain simulations • What can we conclude?

  3. Measurements of Fritz presented by Elena at Chamonix 2001 40 MHz 2001 2012 0 16 5 0 0 0 0 8 (new) 4 5+1 3 2 1 1 1 TCE + 1 TCSP  Other elements to consider?

  4. Replacing the wires with a solid on a simplified model With wire (spacing between wires =20 mm, larger than in reality) Wire replaced by a solid (much easier for the code)

  5. Replacing the wires with a solid:real longitudinal impedance Im(Zlong/n) ~14 mOhm It seems we can model the wires as solids for the longitudinal impedance. Wakefields were not damped, hence the

  6. Replacing the wires with a solid:Imaginary vertical impedance Im(Zy_eff)=40(/5mm)=8 kOhm/m for this simplified model

  7. Replacing the wires with a solid:Imaginary horizontal impedance Different amplitudes for both models can be due to different wake lengths Im(Zx_eff)= 12 Ohm (/5mm)= 2.4 kOhm/m for this simplified model As a conclusion from these studies, the ZS wires do not seem to be contributing significantly to the ZS impedance (at frequencies < 1GHz).

  8. Simplified vs full geometry Simplified geometry generated from the drawing Full geometry imported from CATIA steel Perfect conductor dielectric

  9. ZS longitudinal impedance (real): Quite different behaviour, in particular above 500 MHz!

  10. ZS longitudinal impedance (real): These harmonics of ~40 MHz should be linked to the length of the ZS (3.2 m) 43 MHz 35 MHz The smaller frequency for the full structure could be due to the presence of the dielectric rods.

  11. ZS longitudinal impedance (imaginary): Similar effective longitudinal impedance at low frequency is therefore predicted for the full and for the simplified geometry

  12. Frequency domain (eigenmode) simulationslongitudinal modes with the simplified geometry and stainless steel materials 43 MHz 44 MHz 43 MHz 44 MHz 44 MHz 44 MHz Abs(H) Abs(H) f=257 MHz f=290 MHz

  13. Full vs simplified: imaginary vertical impedance Very different behaviour. Full structure: Im(Zeff_y)~40 KOhm/m Simplified structure: Im(Zeff_y)~10 KOhm/m

  14. Transitions between ZS (question from Jan) Effective impedances at low frequency Im(Zlong/n)~ 7 mOhm Im(Zx)~ 2 kOhm/m Im(Zy)~ 8 kOhm/m 1.18 GHz Rs=1.1 MOhm (stainless steel) Q=14000 (stainless steel) 900 MHz

  15. What can we conclude for now? • With the current simulations: • From the transverse effective impedance point of view, the 6 ZS seem to contribute to ~ 1% of the total imaginary effective vertical impedance (6 ZS (6*40 mOhm/m) +7 transitions (7*8 kOhm/m)~300 kOhm/m, i.e. ~1.5% of the SPS transverse effective imaginary impedance). • From the longitudinal effective impedance point of view, the 6 ZS seem to contribute to 1% of the imaginary effective longitudinal impedance (6 ZS (6*14 mOhm) +7 transitions (7*7 mOhm)~130 mOhm, i.e. ~1.3% of the SPS longitudinal effective imaginary impedance Z/n). • The impact of the ZS longitudinal harmonics of ~40 MHz reaching 100 kOhm should be studied in detail to know if they represent an issue. • If the large modes at around 1.1 GHz of the ZS transitions are an issue for longitudinal stability, these transitions should be optimized. • The ZS wires do not seem to contribute significantly to the impedance of the ZS (at frequencies below 1 GHz)

  16. Questions that remain to be answered: • Effect of voltage applied to ion traps • Effect of connection of the ion traps • Can we understand the reason for the burst behaviour around 700 MHz and 1.1 GHz in the full model? Can that be a numerical problem? • Study and impact of transverse modes • Should we remeasure the ZS?  More studies are needed, and the new powerful PCs are helping greatly.

  17. Horizontal impedance of transitions

More Related