270 likes | 394 Views
Intercarrier Compensation. Nextel calls to BellSouth. BellSouth pays to terminate Nextel calls In aggregate, it may cause BellSouth to increase capacity. 2 Theoretical Pricing Schemes. Bill and Keep Calling Network Pays. Crazy Patchwork of Intercarrier Compensation Schemes.
E N D
Nextel calls to BellSouth • BellSouth pays to terminate Nextel calls • In aggregate, it may cause BellSouth to increase capacity
2 Theoretical Pricing Schemes • Bill and Keep • Calling Network Pays
Crazy Patchwork of Intercarrier Compensation Schemes • Long Distance Access Charges • ILEC to CLEC reciprocal compensation for local interconnection
Price Discrimination • Selling the same product to different customers for a different price • Must be able to prevent arbitrage
LD Arbitrage • If local interconnection price is less than LD access charge, there is an incentive to use arbitrage and terminate LD traffic as local. • Worldcom/MCI, July 2003 accused of doing this.
ISP Reciprocal Compensation • With "high" terminating rate for local calls, CLECs have an incentive to connect users with large terminating traffic like ISPs. • Popular in late 90’s; 2001 FCC exempted inbound ISP traffic from reciprocal compensation
Intercarrier Compensation and VoIP • IP-to-IP – no charges • PSTN-to-PSTN – regular access charges • IP-to-PSTN • ILECS say access charges • VoIP providers say reciprocal compensation
Other VoIP Complications • Virtual FX arrangement – VoIP subscriber gets telephone number that “acts” as a local number • Verizon lawsuit against Vonage
Wireless Interconnection • Should wireless companies get terminating access charges? • 1996 FCC suggested that they should • 1996-2002 nothing is done • 2002 no tariffs only contracts; FCC gave no guidance on contracts; left in limbo again • What charges for “transiting” or bridging a wireless carrier and other carrier?
Access Charges after Divestiture (1984) • How do Long Distance Companies pay for Local Network after divestiture?
Types of Local Costs • NTS (non-traffic-sensitive) costs • largest category of costs • subscriber lines, station equipment, inside wiring, and parts of the central office • TS (Traffic Sensitive) Costs • Local switching,trunking, tandem switching
1980 Access Charge Plan – Pure I • NTS (non-traffic-sensitive) costs would be distributed on the basis of minutes of use. • This plan is called Pure I - all NTS recovered through TS rates.
1982 Access Charge Plan – Pure II • Argued that it was inefficient to recover NTS costs through TS rates. • Pure II recovered NTS costs through fixed charge per subscriber. • "Every customer would pay a flat (per line) access charge that did not vary with use, plus usage based interstate charges that reflected only usage sensitive facilities.”
1982 Plan cont’d • Commission adopted Pure II as a long-run goal but had a long transition period and many special provisions. • NTS costs for 1984 were $8.5 billion for 100 million lines or $85 per line. • Plan had first year phase in of $4 per line for business and $2 per line for res. This became known as a SLC charge or subscriber line charge. Initial business rate changed in 1983 to $6 per line.
FCC changes plan. • SLC delayed until June 1, 1985 and capped at $4 until 1990. • OCCs were given a 55% discount and gradually phased out as equal access became available.
Initial Switched Access Charge • Massive in size 43,000 pages of tariffs, 160,000 pages of support material. • Price was based on RR/Q. Usually based on historical data - none existed.
CCL Rate declined • 5.24 cents per minute (1984) • 1 cent per minute originating and 1.53 cents per minute terminating (1990) • Total TS & CCL on both ends went from 17.3 cents in 1984 to 7.8 cents in 1990.
Unbundling of network under Telecom Act of 1996 • Pricing for unbundling is based on T[E]LRIC. Total element long-run incremental cost. • Forward-looking cost standard that looks at the incremental or additional cost that that element imposes on the network. • FCC is modifying the TSLRIC methodology to include joint and common costs and a normal return on profit. • Subject of much criticism.
Access Charge Reform Decision Effective 1/1/98 • SLC charges - • Res. - Primary Lines capped at $3.50; secondary lines $5.00 • Single line bus. $3.50 • Multiline bus. - 9.00/line/mo (avg now is $6,92/line/mo)
Access Charge Reform Effective 1/1/98 • PICC - Presubscribed Interexchange Carrier Charge • flat rate per line charge to IXCs to keep SLC low and lower CCL • in 1998, max. PICC is $0.53/line/mo for res and single line bus. • Non-primary res. PICC is $1.50/line/mo • Multiline bus. Is $2.75 1/1/99 increase by $1.50
PICC increase 7/1/99 • Max PICC raised to $1.04/line/mo for res. And single line business • Non-primary res. PICC is $2.53/line/mo • Lowered switched access charge (CCL rate)
Changes effective 2/1/00 • Eliminates residential and single line business PICC • Reduces over time the PICC for multiline business until it is eliminated in most areas
SLC Increases • Increases SLC charge of residential and single line business • 7/1/2000 $4.35 • 7/1/2001 $5.00 • 7/1/2002 $6.00 • 7/1/2003 $6.50
Removes Implicit Subsidies • $650 million in implicit universal service support from access charges • replaces it with an explicit, portable universal service fund charge • ensures affordable phone service for high-cost areas.
Need for Unified Solution and Terminating Access monopoly • Antiregulatory solution: Freedom to deny interconnection • Highly regulatory solution: Cost-based calling network pays with no implicit subsidies • Moderately regulatory solution: Bill and Keep