1 / 22

Towards a Set of Design Principles for Executive Compensation Contracts

Towards a Set of Design Principles for Executive Compensation Contracts. Yaowen Shan and Terry Walter University of Technology, Sydney And University of Sydney. Terry Walter Chief Research Officer, Sirca Limited April 2014. Good empirical research attributes.

lowell
Download Presentation

Towards a Set of Design Principles for Executive Compensation Contracts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Towards a Set of Design Principles for Executive Compensation Contracts Yaowen Shan and Terry Walter University of Technology, Sydney And University of Sydney Terry Walter Chief Research Officer, Sirca Limited April 2014

  2. Good empirical research attributes • The qualities of good empirical research: • Choice of a research question that is important and interesting to others • An outcome that is believed to add to knowledge or understanding • Hypotheses that have solid theoretical foundation • Models that are rigorous, parsimonious and fruitful • Care in sample selection and data collection

  3. Good empirical research attributes • Appropriate data analysis and inferences that are correct • Robustness checks, so that, for example, the findings are shown not to be sensitive to the choice of proxy variables or outliers (a few extreme values) in the data • Intuitive checks on the reasonableness of the findings • Adequate discussion and valid interpretation of the findings • Sound appreciation of the study’s implications and limitations

  4. Introduction and Overview Executive compensation is controversial It has been so for more than 80 years We argue that much of this is due to design weaknesses in compensation contracts We develop a set of principles that we argue should be present in all (listed) company contracts We seek comment, criticism and suggestions so as to build a consensus

  5. Theories of Executive Compensation Efficient Contracting Theories Managerial Power Theories Unintended Regulatory Consequences Legal Perspective

  6. Global Trends in Exec. Comp.

  7. Global Trends in Exec. Comp

  8. Global Trends in Exec. Comp.

  9. Global Trends- International

  10. Global Trends- International

  11. Global Trends- International

  12. Global Trends- International

  13. Australia

  14. Our Design Principles 1 - 2 1. Executive compensation should consist of two broad elements, a base pay and a flexible bonus element 2. The base pay should be set taking into account the market for managerial talent. It can be adjusted to reflect changes in the market for managerial talent.

  15. Our Design Principles 3 - 4 • 3. The bonus element should be based on performance of the firm, and its payment should vest over several years depending on performance outcomes over those years • 4. The bonus element paid should be capped

  16. Our Design Principles 5 Equity-based compensation grants should be adjusted for dividend payments. The exercise price of executive options should be adjusted downward, while restricted stock should have dividend entitlements and the entitlement to shares should be adjusted upward by assuming the dividend is re-invested to acquire additional stock.

  17. Our Design Principles 6 6. Performance measurement is subject to measurement error, and accordingly performance should be classified as (i) superior to the benchmark (ii) indistinguishable from the benchmark and (iii) below the benchmark. Performance that is below the benchmark should result in no bonus reward for the current period. The performance bonus should be higher for superior performance than it is for performance that is indistinguishable from the benchmark.

  18. Our Design Principles 7 Firm performance should be measured relative to an appropriate independently selected set of peers taking risk into account. Bonus awards should be based on a measure of abnormal performance calculated as the firm’s actual performance less the performance that is expected, given the actual performance of the benchmark peers. Firms with listed securities should use sharemarketreturns in assessing abnormal performance

  19. Our Design Principles 7 (cont) Audited accounting-based measures of performance can also be used providing that these are prepared on a consistent basis. Audited cash-flow measures of performance should be used as a check on the reasonableness of earnings measures.

  20. Our Design Principles 8 8. Termination payments should be a function of the benchmark adjusted performance of the firm during the tenure of the executive. Three broad categories of performance should be developed. Entitlements to incentive payments that have been earned but that have not yet vested should vest on a CEO’s resignation, however these should be subject to some clawback. A CEO who is dismissed for poor performance or inappropriate or illegal conduct should receive no termination bonuses.

  21. Illustration for Six CEOs

  22. An Application to CEOs

More Related