1 / 35

Service-Learning Workshop # 5

Service-Learning Workshop # 5. Working Effectively with Community Partners. Tennessee State University Service Learning and Civic Engagement. LEARNING in ACTION. Review of the Seven Elements of High Quality Service. 1.Integrated Learning- clearly articulated learning outcomes

lowri
Download Presentation

Service-Learning Workshop # 5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Service-Learning Workshop # 5 Working Effectively with Community Partners

  2. Tennessee State UniversityService Learningand Civic Engagement

  3. LEARNING in ACTION

  4. Review of the Seven Elements of High Quality Service 1.Integrated Learning- clearly articulated learning outcomes 2. High Quality Service- meet actual community need 3. Collaboration- all partners benefit and contribute 4. Student Voice- students actively plan & participate 5. Civic Responsibility- contributes to the community 6. Reflection- connect service & academic learning 7. Evaluation- measure learning & service goals

  5. Workshop Topics • Finding appropriate community partners • What’s important in a partner? • How do I find a partner? • Making first contact • Organizing a project • Building partnerships • Faculty and community partnership • Student and community partnership • Sustaining partnerships • Review of Syllabus Development, Reflection, Grading • Your questions, concerns, and successes

  6. Campus Community Partnerships for Health(a good guide) Principles of Good Community-Campus PartnershipsAdopted by the CCPH Board of Directors, October 2006 http://www.ccph.info/

  7. How can we formally integrate the principles of partnershipinto our work?

  8. Pre-flection • What are some of the key components you are looking for in a community partner? • How have you identified community partners?

  9. The Service-Learning Quadrant The Service-Learning Quadrant, developed at the Service-Learning 2000 Center, Stanford University, California, provides an effective method for recognizing the differences between high service and low service, unrelated learning and integrated service-learning projects.

  10. Questions to Consider when Designing a Service Learning Project • What are my course objectives? • What to I hope to achieve through this partnership? • What course concepts to I desire my students to learn through a hands-on experience? How can I reinforce this goal in the classroom? • How can the students and I contribute to our local community? • What type of service learning is the best fit for these students? • Direct Service, Capacity Building, Policy Development, Education, etc.?

  11. What’s Important in a Community Partner? • Provides support for learning • Has needs that directly relate to your course objectives and students can address. • Willing collaborator & communicator. • Able to mentor students. • Provides safe learning environment. • Has enough infrastructure to support the students’ work

  12. What’s Important in a Community Partner? • Logistically works for students • Open during hours that work with students’ schedules. • Willing to work with students’ schedules. • Location accessible to students. • Can accommodate the number of students in your course.

  13. How to Find Community Partners: • Service-learning website • Center for Service-Learning Staff • Prior knowledge and interest in the organization • On site visit • Community Partner Activities • Partners in Service Learning Events • Colleagues’ recommendations • Students’ Proposals • Miscellaneous Resources • Community foundation • Internet

  14. S-L Staff as Matchmakers • Pros • Staff have knowledge of wide range of organizations • Staff can “weed out” the least relevant options • Staff can facilitate first contact between faculty and partner • Faculty have to identify the course objectives they hope to address via service-learning. • If you are new to service-learning, this can be very helpful. • Cons • You are relying on a matchmaker who may not completely understand your course objectives.

  15. Web Site Approach • Pros • Wide range of organizations at your finger tips. • You do the “weeding out” with your specific course objectives in mind. • You make first contact with partners. • A seasoned practitioner might enjoy this level of control. • Cons • Can be overwhelming, especially for a novice to service-learning. • “Weeding out” process rests with you which can be time consuming.

  16. Faculty Interest Drives Partnership • Pros • Creating a partnership based on interest and passion. • May already have a rapport with staff at the organization. • Don’t need an introduction. • Established lines of communication. • Can focus on building a partnership rather than simply finding one. • Familiarity with needs and structure of organization. • Better sense of what your students’ experiences will be. • Better sense of how your course objectives will be met through service-learning at this particular organization. • Cons • If involved with the organization in another capacity prior to service-learning partnership, may need to re-negotiate or re-define roles.

  17. Students Choose • Pros • Students may be more likely to have a genuine interest in the project if they self-select. • Students less resistant to service-learning because they can find a service site that fits into their schedules. • Easier on the faculty member in terms of finding service-learning placements. • Cons • Run the risk of service sites that are not consistent with teaching course objectives. • Faculty are not creating partnerships; they are creating placements. • Faculty may have as many community partners as they have students in their class. • Faculty members have a lot less control over quality of the learning. • Have to build in quality control mechanisms (e.g. site approval process). • Run the risk that the focus becomes more about service, less about learning.

  18. Miscellaneous Resources • Pros • Faculty may find new resources not previously considered • Faculty can find partners that meet course topics and personal research interest • There is the opportunity for creativity in establishing new relationships. • Cons • Some apprehension may exist in calling an unfamiliar agency and explaining a new collaboration effort • Information may not be conveyed clearly enough • An agency may be exhausted by other classes

  19. First Contact: The Initial Conversation • If the partner is unfamiliar with the concept provide a brief summation of service-learning. What is it? • Examples: • A teaching style where students work in the community to learn classroom concepts • Students gain insight into civic responsibility • Mutually beneficial • Give examples of potential projects • Summarize your course syllabus and highlight why you think your class and their organization might be a great partnership. • What assets do they offer as co-facilitators of student learning? • What needs do they have that might integrate with the course’s objectives? • Ask about their “to do” list.

  20. Organizing a Project: It Takes Two • Suggested things to discuss/clarify • Contact Information • Preferred method of contact • Hours of project (time and amount) • Number of students needed • Mission Statement/Agency Objectives • Project information- details • Course objective relevance • Additional information not previously listed • Roles to Play: Coordination & Expectations • Faculty member is the classroom teacher • Community Partner is the lab instructor

  21. A Follow-up to the Conversation • Send Course Materials • Syllabi is the minimum • Consider other items that might help partners • Faculty contact information • SL assignments • SL readings • Links to SL sites • Student Contact Information (voluntary) • Seek a second contact for clarification • Welcome materials from community partners • Organizational Handouts • Announcement, flyers, etc. on project details

  22. Planning for the Orientation • How will your students get oriented to the site(s)? • In class presentation or on-site??? • Community Partner Website or brochures? • Share your success stories

  23. Building Partnerships • Level the playing field • Help the community partners to feel like a part of the teaching/learning team • Help them to understand about academic timelines Include them in planning and evaluation activities • Open lines of communication • Provide partners with syllabus & assignments • Open dialogue about expectations

  24. Building Partnerships • Keep in Contact • Follow up phone calls • “Check-In” emails throughout the semester • Organize community partners’ emails in a group list • Invite partners to class activities • Oral Presentations • Reading Discussions • Introduction of Projects • Guest Speakers

  25. Building Partnerships • Faculty make site visits • To observe students in action • To serve along side of students • To hold a class or reflection session on site • Community Partner Orientation • Community Partner Handbook • Institution Sponsored Activities

  26. Building Partnerships:Community Partner Handbook (see website) • Introduction • Expectations and responsibilities • Faculty hopes and objectives • Materials • Syllabus • Assignments • Readings • Faculty Contact Information

  27. ChallengesPlease share the challenges you have overcome and how…. • Transportation • Time • Supervision • Evaluation • Others

  28. Sharing Experiences What methods have you employed • to build partnerships? • To solve problems? • To incorporate meaningful reflections? • To evaluate your students’ learning?

  29. Student and Community Partner: A Working Relationship • Student and Partner Contact • Encourage partners to provide an orientation meeting for students • Request students go as a group the first time to meet a partner and learn more about the project. • Suggest a tour, if applicable • Reminder: students are service-learning students, not volunteers. They’ve come to learn from you. • When a problem arises, reassure students in approaching partners for clarification or help. • Incorporate partner information as part of a refection exercise. • Example: What have you learned about your agency/organization thus far and its role in the community? • Student Partner Contract (see samples)

  30. Sustaining Partnerships:Communication & Collaboration • Get feedback from partners • throughout the semester (on the partnership, student performance, etc.) • At the end of each semester to assess what needs to occur next time • Review the community partner contact and project information form • Inquire about their current needs and objectives. • Ask the community partner to complete the evaluation form • Provide recognition of their contribution to teaching your students • Certificate • Invite them to a campus sponsored recognition event

  31. Sustaining Partnerships:Communication & Collaboration • Follow through on their requests for assistance • Letters of support on grants • Helping them to identify staff members • Open Dialogue about needs • Needs of the organization may change over time. • Your needs may change over time. • Dialogue to make sure both needs are still being met through the partnership. • Consider a community partner evaluation form • Plan Ahead • Discuss changes and continuances for the next term • Review the community partner contact and project information form • Inquire about their current needs and objectives.

  32. Expect the Unexpected: When problems arise, how will you deal with them? • Faculty as Mediator • Student and Community Partner issues • Behavior issues • Change in partners’ requirements and expectations • Investigating the Miscommunication • Faculty and Community Partner differences • What is the concern? • Course objectives not clearly explained? • Mission or expectation of the partner not understood? • Break down in communication between faculty and student or community partner and their staff?

  33. Other Issues/Challenges Staff Changes at the site • Reestablish contact • Send basic materials again if necessary • Review project agreements and make new arrangements if needed. • Inform students of any changes • Be prepared with a back up plan Other challenges????

  34. Reflection • List three things you will do to either find, build, or sustain a community partnership. • How will you use information from this workshop to improve your practice?

  35. Conclusion • A good relationship with a community partner begins with open communication and continues to develop through the same means. • Course content, logistics of location and time, and cooperation drive much of your efforts in finding the appropriate community partner. • There are a number of ways to find partners, all have advantages and disadvantages. • Employ the methods that produce partnerships that are best suited to teaching your course objectives. • Partnerships, like any relationship, need to be nurtured. • Much of this is accomplished through contact, communication and collaboration.

More Related