1 / 19

Virginia Tech and LibQual+ 2004

This article discusses the findings of the LibQual+ survey conducted at Virginia Tech in 2004, highlighting the strategies for increasing participation, addressing user expectations, and improving overall satisfaction. The survey results provided valuable insights for decision-making and shaping the future of library services.

lshatley
Download Presentation

Virginia Tech and LibQual+ 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Virginia Tech and LibQual+ 2004 LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17, 2005 Boston, MA Eileen E. Hitchingham Dean University Libraries, Virginia Tech hitch@vt.edu a half decade of partnership and the love affair continues…..

  2. VT LibQual+ Survey Groups2000- 2005

  3. Strategy for getting participation • No incentives • Bug them a lot

  4. Graduate Students LibQual+ items for which we don’t meet minimum expectations Information Control a library web enabling me to locate information on my own Information Control the electronic information resources I need Information Control journal collections I require for my work

  5. Undergraduates No LibQual+ items with the dread red- don’t meet minimum expectations

  6. When we say ARL average we are comparing to the average of those ARL libraries in the spring 2004 survey…

  7. Everybody uses Google…

  8. Graduate Student Comparisons of minimum, perceived, desired on dimension summaries A public major research institution VT

  9. With a small staff and not too many $$ we continue to hover around average for ARL’s on the dimensions and overall satisfaction Fewer comments regarding copiers came in for 2004 after we did a consolidation fix following the 2003 LibQual+ Our users were not satisfied with web access prompting a major revision in summer 2004 Our users found our old PC’s lacking and we added 60 new public PC’s in summer 2004 Our graduate students are generally satisfied on the affect of service dimension, but not our undergraduates. Almost 16% of the comments noted that students – all disciplines, grad, undergrad, wanted a more comfortable, visually appealing library and we are using these comments in the capital project request cycle Our undergraduate students use the physical and electronic library less than students in other ARL libraries and we are using this information as part of the input to the core curriculum review LibQual+ is useful all year, whatever the discussion we often end up saying “LibQual+ showed us that….. So what have we learned and what have we done?

More Related