1 / 12

Comments for ‘Proposal of Fire resistance test’

Comments for ‘Proposal of Fire resistance test’. July 5 ~7, 2011. Hyuk Jung , Chief Researcher Jihun Cha , Researcher. Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute (KATRI). RESS-4-11. 3. 2. 1. 4. Test conditions & results.

lshipp
Download Presentation

Comments for ‘Proposal of Fire resistance test’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comments for ‘Proposal of Fire resistance test’ July 5 ~7, 2011 Hyuk Jung , Chief Researcher Jihun Cha , Researcher Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute (KATRI) RESS-4-11

  2. 3 2 1 4 Test conditions & results Testconfigurations Test purpose Comments for ‘Fire resistance test’ Table of Contents 2/19

  3. Test purpose 1. Test purpose • To verify • whether proposal of ‘fire resistance test’ • has any problem • Measuring T – profile • Checking outdoor test possibility 3/11

  4. Test configurations 2. Test configurations Test rig DAQ DAQ Mock-up Pan 4/11

  5. Test conditions 1/2 3. Test conditions & results Measuring point 5/11

  6. Test conditions 2/2 3. Test conditions & results 6/11

  7. Test results 1/2 3. Test conditions & results 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 2 1 3 2 4 6 7 8 5 7/11

  8. Test results 2/2 3. Test conditions & results • Despite of the weak wind, • temperature curve cannot be easily stablized • Even if initial wind velocity is lower than • proposal limitation, • heat generated by flame causes turbulence • Temperature at is the highest one 1 8/11

  9. 3. Test conditions & results • K-type thermo couple (D : 6.4/3.2 mm) • NEV type RESS • HEV type RESS 9/11

  10. Comments 1/2 4. Comments for ‘Fire resistance test’ 10/11

  11. Comments 2/2 4. Comments for ‘Fire resistance test’ • Rationale of proposal : • Simulates exposure of [RESS] to fire from the outside of the vehicle due to e.g. a fuel spill from a vehicle (either the vehicle itself or a nearby vehicle). This situation should leave the driver and passengers with enough time to evacuate and no explosion should occur in a later stage. 11/11

  12. Thank you!

More Related