1 / 51

Jochen Dingfelder Universität Freiburg

B. X. Semileptonic Decays at the B Factories and the CKM Matrix - Probing the Weak and Strong Interactions -. Jochen Dingfelder Universität Freiburg. Seminar Teilchenphysik, Bonn, December 18, 2008. A Brief Outline. Introduction & Motivation: CKM Matrix, B Factories,

luana
Download Presentation

Jochen Dingfelder Universität Freiburg

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. B X Semileptonic Decays at the B Factoriesand the CKM Matrix- Probing the Weak and Strong Interactions - Jochen Dingfelder Universität Freiburg Seminar Teilchenphysik, Bonn, December 18, 2008

  2. A Brief Outline • Introduction & Motivation: CKM Matrix, B Factories, analysis strategies, and all that … • Inclusive Semileptonic Decays and the Determination of • |Vcb| • |Vub| • Exclusive Semileptonic Decays and the Determination of • |Vcb| • |Vub| • Semileptonic Decays with Tau • Conclusions & Outlook

  3. A Good Year for a Talk on the CKM Matrix … The CKM mechanism is now a well-tested theory Experimental proof comes from B-physics experiments by

  4. Quarks and the Weak Interaction Vud Vus Vub Vcd VcsVcb VtdVts Vtb 1-c2c A c3(-i) = -c 1- c2/2 A c2 Ac3(1--i) -A c2 1 VCKM = u c t d s b + O(c4) [ c= sinc~ 0.22] Im W Re • Quark mass eigenstates ≠ flavor eigenstates • Mixing matrix: elements  coupling strengths • Unitarity V†V= 1: |Vud|2 + |Vus|2 + |Vub|2 = 1 VudVub* + VcdVcb* + VtdVtb* = 0

  5. Constraining the Unitarity Triangle sin2b K0K0 mixing (Kaon experiments) Bd0Bd0 and Bs0Bs0 Mixing (TeVatron) |Vub / Vcb| Best Constraints From B factories Angles : CP violation measurements (time-dependent asymmetries) Sides : Semileptonic decays, B0B0 mixing, …

  6. Measuring CKM Elements

  7. The Beauty of Semileptonic Decays • Study weak interaction • |Vcb| , |Vub| d • Study strong interaction • Charmed or Charmless decays: BXc ℓnorBXuℓn Analogy to deep-inelast. scattering b Semileptonic decays are an ideal laboratory to study Quark Couplings and B-Meson Structure

  8. B-Factory Experimental Tools BXc,uℓn off peak (q=u,d,s,c) - Goode, m ID (p*ℓ> 1 GeV) - Goodhadron ID(e.g. p/K separation) - Angular coverage ≈ 91% of 4p in CMS (challenge fornreconstruction) 2mB BaBar: 531 fb-1 Belle: >840 fb-1 3.1GeV e+ 9GeV e-

  9. Analysis Strategies Tagged or untagged: n B+→ r0 m+ n D0 r0 B+ B- p0 Y(4S) n m+ p- signal B tag B p- Hadronic tag: B  D + “ p+, p0, K+, K0”  charge, flavor, p of both B’s (very clean, but e ~ few ‰) p+ r0 m+ pm~2.2 GeV Inclusive: Identify only lepton and “sum over final states” or Exclusive: Reconstruct final-state hadron X (e.g. B+→r0 ℓ +n)

  10. Inclusive Semileptonic Decays - Theory Theoretical Tool: Heavy-Quark-Expansion (HQE) • Perturbative corrections are calculable • Anon-pert depends on non-perturbative HQE parameters arising • at each order in 1/mb, they need to be measured

  11. HQE Parameters from Moments Lepton energy cut Non-perturbative parameters appearing at order 1/mb2 or 1/mb3 • HQE does not give local quantities such as dG/dE • Calculations exist for moments of inclusive spectra, e.g. • lepton-energy (Eℓ) or hadronic-mass (MX) moments. • Measure over large region of phase space to avoid problem with • quark-hadron duality: • Calculations in two mass schemes: • - Kinetic scheme: Benson, Bigi, Gambino, Mannel, Uraltsev • - 1S scheme : Bauer, Ligeti, Luke, Manohar, Trott • Fit to ~ 60 measured moments from DELPHI, CLEO, BABAR, Belle, CDF • to determine 6 parameters

  12. How the Moments are Measured Xc p Btag e- D* e+ n Bsignal Xu l • Fully reconstruct one B • Find lepton with minimum pℓ • Hadron X = rest of event • Improve resolution: kinematic fit • - E, p conservation • - Emiss, pmiss consistent with n • Correct bias of mX moments • due to unmeasured particles D,D* higher-mass states

  13. Global Fit to Moments measured moments theory (HQE) <Ee> <(Ee-<Ee>)2> DB <(Ee-<Ee>)3> b → sg b → sg <MX2> <MX4> <Eg> <(Eg-<Eg>)2> lepton momentum cut • Every moment has a different dependence on |Vcb|, mb, mc, HQE par’s • Included in fit: ●, not included: ◦

  14. Fit Results: |Vcb| and b-Quark Mass s(|Vcb|) < 2% s(mb) ≈ 1% + results for mc, HQE parameters (e.g. mp2)

  15. Charmless Semileptonic Decays We want to measure this ! B → Xu ℓ n Biggest experimental challenge: huge B → Xc ℓ n bkg

  16. B → Xu ℓ n Inclusive Rate lepton energy Eℓ q2 = (pℓ+pv)2 hadron mass mX P+ = EX-pX • Suppression of B → Xc ℓ n by restricting phase space (mu < mc) •  measure partial rates: • Big caveat:HQE conversionruined inlimited phase space! • Need to resum non-perturbative contributions •  non-perturbative distribution function (“shape function”)

  17. Shape Function – What Is It? B  Xuln E*(lepton) (GeV) B  Xs g E*(photon) (GeV) • Shape function = light-cone momentum distribution of b quark: f(k+) • ≈ Fermi motion of b quark parallel to u-quark velocity • Universal property of B mesons (to leading order) • Consequences: Smearing of kinematic spectra !

  18. Shape Function – How to Measure It? • From B → Xc ℓ n (and B → Xsg): HQE Assume functional form of f(k+)

  19. Theory Calculations • Measure partial rate in region where S/B good and rate prediction reliable Problem at high q2: Weak Annihilation (WA)

  20. Lepton-Energy “Endpoint” Inclusive: events with electron (Ee > 1GeV) on-peak data Continuum Subtract e+e- qq - off-peak data, - on-peak beyond Ee endpoint on-peak data (cont. subtr.) Simulated B Xcln • Subtract B  Xcℓn • fit simulation to data on-peak data (all bkg subtr.) Simulated signal Spectrum needs to be corrected for efficiency predicted partial rate DB(B  Xen) = (0.57 ±0.04stat ±0.07syst) × 10-3 |Vub| = (4.44 ± 0.25exp ± 0.40SF± 0.22theo) ×10-3

  21. |Vub| from other Kinematic Spectra 383M BB P+=Ex - |Px| q2 Mx Not efficiency corrected BLNP GDE BLNP GDE BLNP GDE BLL • Hadronic B tags reconstruct kinematic spectra of signal B decay One data set: 3 calculations give 7 values for |Vub|!

  22. |Vub| Results BLNP and SF moments from B → Xc ℓ n (and B → Xsg) |Vub|= (4.32 ± 0.16exp ± 0.32th) x 10-3 Error Budget Total Error: 8.9 % Exp. 3.8% Theo. 8.1%

  23. |Vub| Average for Various Theories • Many theoretical approaches  many |Vub| values • Results vary from • 3.76 x 10-3 to 4.92 x 10-3 •  not very satisfactory! • Goal for the future: • Try to measure full rate • (or as much as possible) • to avoid shape function •  HQE converges

  24. |Vcb| from Exclusive Decays: Theoretical Tools • Form factors (Caprini et al.): From Lattice QCD From Experiment • Differential decay rate: w = 1

  25. B → D/D* ℓ n D D* D* M2miss (GeV2) G(1)|Vcb| G(1)|Vcb| slope r2D D D w w • Hadronic B tag • D0→ K-p+ • D*0 → D0p0soft • Determine exclusive • yields in 10 w bins • from fit to M2miss • 2 fit of Caprini et al. • to wspectrum

  26. Simultaneous Measurement of D and D* • No psoft reconstruction for D* • Get D/D* rates from binned • 3d fit to pℓ, pD, cosqBY • (pD correlated to w •  sensitivity to rD, rD*,|Vcb|) • Relate BF(B0) to BF(B+) • using lifetime ratio • Fix D** rate (HFAG average)

  27. Status of Exclusive |Vcb| B → D ℓ n B → D* ℓ n compare with inclusive: (41.6 ± 0.6) x 10-3  2.3 s difference

  28. Anatomy of Semileptonic Decays: D** BaBar preliminary Tagged GeV/c2 Charm states • Use D** as nickname for • D(*) (np) with n ≥ 1 • Narrow states : D1 , D2* • Broad states : D0*, D1’ • Untagged meas. by BaBar (narrow), • tagged meas. by BaBar and Belle • (narrow and broad)

  29. Where is the Rest? • Many measurements, but some unsolved puzzles remain: • Inclusive BF ≠ BF(D) + BF(D*) + BF(D**) • > 10% of inclusive rate is missing  non-resonant? • (2) Measured rate for narrow and broad D** states is similar, • but QCD sum rules predict Gnarrow ≈ O(10) Gbroad

  30. Exclusive |Vub| r0 p+ h h r+ p0 non-resonant • |Vub| • strong interaction •  form factors = p, h, h’, r, w

  31. Overview of Analyses • Many measurements with different tagging techniques  New result (2008) Currently most precise

  32. B → pℓnUntagged • Reconstruct neutrino from full event: • Extract signal yield in 12 q2bins from fit toDE vs. mES distributions: BaBar 206 fb-1 • Continuum - low and high q2 • checked with • offres. data Signal • B → Xuℓn • high q2 • -large • uncertainty • B → Xcℓn • medium q2 • overall • largest bkg. Total: Nsig~ 5000

  33. q2 Dependence & Form Factor Form-factor calculations Measured q2 spectrum α= 0.52±0.05±0.03 BaBar 206 fb-1 • Use form-factor parametrization to extrapolate LCSR (low q2) • and LQCD(high q2) to all q2: e.g. modified pole approximation (shape parameter a)

  34. B → pℓnBranching Fraction and |Vub| untagged Untagged measurement still dominates the average (sstat < ssyst = 5%)

  35. Towards a Model-Independent |Vub| f+(q2) q2 (GeV2)

  36. Heavier Charmless Resonances 605 fb-1 • Hadronic tagsuseful for measurement of heavier resonances • Pseudoscalar mesons : h → ppp0, h→ hp+p- • Vector mesons :r → p p , w → p+p-p • |Vub| from these modes would be a useful cross-checks of B → pℓ n • LCSR calculations exist; LQCDcalculations aredifficult for these states!

  37. |Vub| & CKM Consistency Inclusive • Most probable value of |Vub|from measurements ofother CKM parameters • Standard Model and exclusive result agree well, inclusive results lie • consistently higher • More work on experimental and theoretical side needed

  38. Inclusive vs. Exclusive |Vub|: Latest News almost full rate incl. |Vub| higher! • New inclusive (multivariate) analysis from Belle (CKM08) • New Lattice Results FNAL/MILC (2008) excl. |Vub| lower!

  39. Tau Final States & New Physics W- or H- • Decay can be mediated by charged Higgs boson • Very clean probe of New Physics • New Physics contributes at tree level • Light-lepton modes well studied •  QCD effects “under control” • Spin-0 Higgs does not couple to all helicity states •  D and D* modes affected differently • No helicity suppression (access to suppress form factor, f0)

  40. B → D(*) tn: Signal Fit

  41. B → D(*) tn: Lepton-Momentum Projections

  42. B → D(*) tn: Results • Standard Model: • Belle: • BaBar: tanb M(H+) Significances: 3.6s (D) , 6.2s (D*) B → D t n already restricts Higgs parameter space in 2HDM, MSSM

  43. Conclusions 2004 2008 • An impressive amount of work has been done! • (*) From inclusive measurements, but better agreement with • exclusive measurements required • Progress from theory needed: inclusive rates and form factors (LQCD) • B → D(*)tn can yield powerful new physics/Higgs constraints • with more statistics

  44. Outlook – A Super B Factory (*) limited by theory

  45. Outlook – A Super B Factory (*) limited by theory “The nightmare”

  46. Outlook – A Super B Factory (*) limited by theory “The nightmare” “The dream”

More Related