1 / 27

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN THE FRENCHMAN CREEK SUBBASIN

OUTLINE. IntroductionSteps to estimate evapotranspirationResultsConclusion. INTRODUCTION. Overview. Goal: Take calculated ET point values and interpolate over an area to obtain a volume of water lost to ET over a year period and use mass balance to obtain a net depletion from groundwaterCa

lucinda
Download Presentation

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN THE FRENCHMAN CREEK SUBBASIN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN THE FRENCHMAN CREEK SUBBASIN Jean Hilger Term Project CIVE 498: GIS Water Resources November 28, 2006 Introduce For my term project I chose the topic Evapotranspiration, and I studied a specific area - Frenchman Creek subbasinIntroduce For my term project I chose the topic Evapotranspiration, and I studied a specific area - Frenchman Creek subbasin

    2. OUTLINE Introduction Steps to estimate evapotranspiration Results Conclusion

    3. INTRODUCTION

    4. Originally thought I would use GIS to calculate ET, come to realize, as Aysha showed us, it takes about 25 powerpoint slides, several years, remote sensing satellites and a PHD to do that. Palmer Drought Index: (from National Climate Data Center) 4 extremely wet -3 severe drought Good comparisonOriginally thought I would use GIS to calculate ET, come to realize, as Aysha showed us, it takes about 25 powerpoint slides, several years, remote sensing satellites and a PHD to do that. Palmer Drought Index: (from National Climate Data Center) 4 extremely wet -3 severe drought Good comparison

    5. Definition Just in case you missed Ayse’s lecture, I’ll repeat some of the things she told us about ET Net depletion – if all others are known (P, ET, O) GW easy to quantify.Definition Just in case you missed Ayse’s lecture, I’ll repeat some of the things she told us about ET Net depletion – if all others are known (P, ET, O) GW easy to quantify.

    6. Location of Frenchman inside the republican This is from USGS NHD (National Hydrography Dataset) Republican is a 4 digit huc 8 digit huc (10250002, 1025 for the Republican) Location of Frenchman inside the republican This is from USGS NHD (National Hydrography Dataset) Republican is a 4 digit huc 8 digit huc (10250002, 1025 for the Republican)

    7. Predevelopment to 2005, from UNL Statewide GIS datasets, CALMIT/CSD Part of the reason I selected the Frenchman Creek subbasin… dead center in this red zonePredevelopment to 2005, from UNL Statewide GIS datasets, CALMIT/CSD Part of the reason I selected the Frenchman Creek subbasin… dead center in this red zone

    8. STEPS TO ESTIMATE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION

    9. 1. Downloaded ET point data from HPRCC HPRCC stands for High Plains Regional Climate Center University of Nebraska- Lincoln School of Natural Resources

    10. Weather measurement stations all across the high plains HPRCC calculates ET using collected data with Penman Equation and Nebraska Wind Function Records hourly data for air temperature and humidity, soil temperature, wind speed and direction, solar radiation, and precipitation They post data online, with password can access and downloadRecords hourly data for air temperature and humidity, soil temperature, wind speed and direction, solar radiation, and precipitation They post data online, with password can access and download

    11. 2. Selected 10 stations in and around the Frenchman subbasin Stations nearest to Frenchman subbasinStations nearest to Frenchman subbasin

    12. Daily ET data at each station Downloaded for 1993 and 2003 This is what the raw data looks like From excell file, highlighted is month, day, year, and on the right, ET in inches List continues through all 12 months, but that would be too long to put on a PowerPoint slideThis is what the raw data looks like From excell file, highlighted is month, day, year, and on the right, ET in inches List continues through all 12 months, but that would be too long to put on a PowerPoint slide

    13. 3. Summed daily ET over each month to obtain monthly ET An example of the summed ET for same station as last slide, Sterling ColoradoAn example of the summed ET for same station as last slide, Sterling Colorado

    14. 4. Created a point feature class of the 10 selected stations Create .dbf table containing latitude and longitude of each station and monthly ET Display xy data in ArcMap Export events to Geodatabase feature class Two point feature classes – one for each year Attributes of each point: Station Name, Latitude, Longitude, Jan ET, Feb ET, March ET… etc.Two point feature classes – one for each year Attributes of each point: Station Name, Latitude, Longitude, Jan ET, Feb ET, March ET… etc.

    15. 5. For each month, interpolated point ET data to raster data Geostatistical Analyst > Geostatistical Wizard > Kriging Spatial Analyst > Interpolate to Raster > Kriging or Spline Two ways to predict ET values in between stations: 1. Geostatistical Wizard – more detailed, more user input, can explore data 2. Spatial Analyst – I tried to use Kriging for most, but Spline seemed to work better for less points, so used that most of the timeTwo ways to predict ET values in between stations: 1. Geostatistical Wizard – more detailed, more user input, can explore data 2. Spatial Analyst – I tried to use Kriging for most, but Spline seemed to work better for less points, so used that most of the time

    16. Example! Love these pictures! This is a raster, displayed w/ contours These are the ET contours Can see it prediced for layer contained by the point data, covers the subbasin Range from 0.9 – 1.9 inches Example! Love these pictures! This is a raster, displayed w/ contours These are the ET contours Can see it prediced for layer contained by the point data, covers the subbasin Range from 0.9 – 1.9 inches

    17. For July Range 5.8 – 10.24 inches Did this for 24 monthsFor July Range 5.8 – 10.24 inches Did this for 24 months

    18. 6. Calculate mean evapotranspiration over the Frenchman subbasin for each month Spatial Analyst > Zonal Statistics Boundary: 8 digit huc of Frenchman subbasin Raster: Interpolated ET, by month Then, for each of the 24, used spatial analyst, zonal statistics w/ huc bouandry to calculate the mean ET value in inches over the basin.Then, for each of the 24, used spatial analyst, zonal statistics w/ huc bouandry to calculate the mean ET value in inches over the basin.

    19. RESULTS

    20. Monthly ET Here are the spatial analyst calculated means for each of the 24 layers About 60 in. for 1993 About 75 in for 2003Here are the spatial analyst calculated means for each of the 24 layers About 60 in. for 1993 About 75 in for 2003

    21. Same information in bar chart… easier to understandSame information in bar chart… easier to understand

    22. Go from inches to a volume – need an area To find basin area: Huc shapefile was in GCS_North_American_1983, had to project to NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_14N (check this!) and when take Zonal Statistics with Spatial Analyst one of the attributes it calculates is area in m2. ET (convert to feet) x area = volume of waterGo from inches to a volume – need an area To find basin area: Huc shapefile was in GCS_North_American_1983, had to project to NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_14N (check this!) and when take Zonal Statistics with Spatial Analyst one of the attributes it calculates is area in m2. ET (convert to feet) x area = volume of water

    23. These are the rough estimates I came up with. Over 5 million for 2003 4 million for 1993 Wondered… where’s all that water coming from?These are the rough estimates I came up with. Over 5 million for 2003 4 million for 1993 Wondered… where’s all that water coming from?

    24. Simple model of Water Mass Balance on the Land Surface… point out ins and out, explain eqn ET from precipitation and irrigation irrigation from pumping and surface Gets complicated make assumptions and simplifications (ie. lump infiltration in with GW and just consider net interaction with groundwater) As said before – ET is an important part of the basin systemSimple model of Water Mass Balance on the Land Surface… point out ins and out, explain eqn ET from precipitation and irrigation irrigation from pumping and surface Gets complicated make assumptions and simplifications (ie. lump infiltration in with GW and just consider net interaction with groundwater) As said before – ET is an important part of the basin system

    25. Precipitation data - National Climate Data Center Flow data - Nebraska Department of Natural Resources - Culbertson gage - just before the Frenchman Creek dumps into the Republican River Notice – assumed positive GW, come up with negative - depletion Conclusive evidence that the groundwater table is sinking? At least-- it gives us a better understanding of the basin as a system.Precipitation data - National Climate Data Center Flow data - Nebraska Department of Natural Resources - Culbertson gage - just before the Frenchman Creek dumps into the Republican River Notice – assumed positive GW, come up with negative - depletion Conclusive evidence that the groundwater table is sinking? At least-- it gives us a better understanding of the basin as a system.

    26. CONCLUSION

    27. Point data to raster data Calculate mean Inches multiplied by area = volume Calculate groundwater Point data to raster data Calculate mean Inches multiplied by area = volume Calculate groundwater

    28. These numbers seem a little high… may be due to assumptions and simplifications made, but gives a rough estimate Not conclusions, closing comments, because I think this study brought out more questions than answers for me Further investigation may include – why is 2003 more than 1993?? Even though overall drier yearThese numbers seem a little high… may be due to assumptions and simplifications made, but gives a rough estimate Not conclusions, closing comments, because I think this study brought out more questions than answers for me Further investigation may include – why is 2003 more than 1993?? Even though overall drier year

More Related