170 likes | 1.53k Views
Lost In the Mall by Elizabeth Loftus. Tucker Bryant & Ellis Schirmer. Theory & Hypothesis. The act of imagining false events led to the creation of false memories. Confabulations can be created through suggestions. Research design & procedure.
E N D
Lost In the Mall by Elizabeth Loftus Tucker Bryant & Ellis Schirmer
Theory & Hypothesis • The act of imagining false events led to the creation of false memories. Confabulations can be created through suggestions.
Research design & procedure • Asked 24 individuals, ranging from 18 to 53, to try to remember childhood events that had been recounted by a relative. • Prepared a booklet for each participant containing one-paragraph stories about three events that had actually happened to them, and one that had not. • Reconstructed the false event using information about a shopping trip provided by relatives, who verified that participant had in fact been lost at about the age of five. • The lost-in-mall scenario included: lost for a time period, crying, aid and comfort by an elderly woman, and reunion with family.
The results • 25% of the participants remembered the fictious event. ( 6 out of 24) • The study provides evidence that people can be led to remember their past in different ways, and they can even be coaxed into “remembering” entire events that never happened.
Ethicalissues • Participant manipulation • Potential for clinical misuse • Nadean Cool Had memories planted by psychiatrist • Undisclosed aim
Ecological Validity • Lab experiment =slightly impaired • No risk of demand characteristics • Focus on cognition leaves little room for ecological application
PRO Well-controlled Replicable Demonstrates cause & effect relationship Supports hypothesis Serves as evidence to further conclusions Permits objectivity and unbiased observations Uses a wide sample of ages Good use of operationalization prevents observer bias CON Social facilitation Extraneous variables; personality Ethical issues with potential application Has been used to draw certain wild conclusions May be situation-specific Survey may be biased by the way questions are asked Possible sampling bias Evaluation
Could this study be done today? • Replication of exact study is feasible • Many replications and variations performed to date • Most studies demonstrate similar conclusions/evidence • Certain variations pose potential ethical breaches • Experiment is fairly recent – 1991
What makes this a classic study? • Verifies inference most people tend to make or refute • Demonstrates awesome power of subconscious • Uses power of suggestion • Proves the human tendency to confabulate