330 likes | 471 Views
The Future of Election Reform (in light of the 2012 elections). Ned Foley & Steven Huefner The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Election Law @ Moritz www.electionlaw.osu.edu. The Future of Election Reform. * Early and Absentee Voting in 2012 Trends and Trade-offs
E N D
The Future of Election Reform(in light of the 2012 elections) Ned Foley & Steven Huefner The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Election Law @ Moritz www.electionlaw.osu.edu
The Future of Election Reform * Early and Absentee Voting in 2012 Trends and Trade-offs * Long Lines at Polling Places in 2012 Nature and Extent of Problem * Post-election Considerations The “Blue Shift” and Its Implications * Reform Prospects and Obstacles
Early and AbsenteeVoting in 2012 Trends and Tradeoffs
Modes of Voting – 2000 [courtesy Charles Stewart, MIT] 2000 (CPS)
Modes of Voting – 2012 [courtesy Charles Stewart, MIT] 2012 (SPAE)
Long Lines atPolling Places in 2012 Nature and Extent of Problem
13 min = avg. Election Day wait 63% said most of this time was waiting to check in [20 min = avg. early voting wait] [courtesy Charles Stewart, MIT]
How Long Did People Wait? [courtesy Charles Stewart, MIT]
How Long Did People Wait? Average waiting time for the 3% who waited more than an hour = 129 minutes
Post-Election Considerations The “Blue Shift” andIts Implications
Uncounted ballots: Ohio, 2008 & 2012 *2008 includes both wrong location and right location **2012 is only wrong location, because of court order on right location ballots *** envelope unsigned, or lacking printed name, or both
Uncounted (& Disputable) Ballots All Ohio numbers from Secretary of State website; 12 Florida from new Smith/Herron data; 08 Florida is domestic only, as reported in EAC Election Day Survey
Y(PBs counted/PBs cast) X(PB cast/all ballots)
Y(PBs counted/all ballots) X(PBs cast/all ballots)
Y(“gain during canvass”) X(PBs cast/all ballots)