1 / 10

Muon Collider Lattice Update

f. Muon Collider Lattice Update. Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC). Neutrino Factory & Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting, Oxford MS January 13-16, 2010. Goals (as discussed @ Brookhaven). 2. Lattice update including:  FF quads displacement to produce dipole field ~2T

ludlow
Download Presentation

Muon Collider Lattice Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. f Muon Collider Lattice Update Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC) Neutrino Factory & Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting, Oxford MS January 13-16, 2010

  2. Goals (as discussed @ Brookhaven) 2 Lattice update including:  FF quads displacement to produce dipole field ~2T  reduce 1st sext strength  larger momentum acceptance and DA  spread  radiation  reduce detector backgrounds?  Momentum compaction factor correction (making it small negative)  less RF voltage  Arc magnet length reduction to get 10T bending field  even smaller circumference  higher luminosity MC Lattice Update - Y. Alexahin NFMCC Meeting Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  3. IR Layout (a view from MARS) 3 courtesy of Vadim A. MC Lattice Update - Y. Alexahin NFMCC Meeting Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  4. IR & Chromatic Correction Section 4 correctors multipoles for higher order chrom. correction Dx (m) RF quads sextupoles bends y Chrom. Correction Block x Wy Wx MC Lattice Update - Y. Alexahin NFMCC Meeting Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  5. One More Innovation: the Arc Cell 5 Dx (m) SY SA SY SX DDx/5 SX x y  Central quad and sextupole SA control the momentum compaction factor and its derivative (via Dx and DDx) w/o significant effect on chromaticity  Large  -functions ratios at SX and SY sextupole locations simplify chromaticity correction  Phase advance 300/ cell  spherical aberrations cancelled in groups of 6 cells  Large dipole packing factor  small circumference (C=2.6 km with 9.2T dipole field) Now C=2.5 km with B=10T MC Lattice Update - Y. Alexahin NFMCC Meeting Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  6. Momentum Acceptance 6 x* Qx Qy y* p p p c Fractional parts of the tunes With 2 IPs the central tunes are 18.56, 16.58 - good (!) for beam-beam effect - good for the orbit stability and DA  Static momentum acceptance = 1.2%, while the baseline scheme calls for only 0.3%  Central value of themomentum compaction factor = -1.4510-5, can be made even smaller MC Lattice Update - Y. Alexahin NFMCC Meeting Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  7. Dynamic Aperture 7 Delta(p)/p: 0.00000000 M o d e 1 M o d e 2 Fractional tunes: Q1 = 0.55999422 Q2 = 0.57999563 First order chromaticity: Q1' = 0.32480253 Q2' = -1.98911112 Second order chromaticity: Q1'' = -862.88043160 Q2'' = 2077.02609602 Normalized anharmonicities: dQ1/dE1 = -0.24797555E+06 dQ1/dE2 = 0.14326980E+06 dQ2/dE2 = 0.73894849E+05 MAD8 STATIC command output - very imprecise! N=0 1024 turns DA (Lie3 tracking method): blue – Courant-Snyder Invariants of stable muons, red – lost muons  CSIy [m] DA= (  CSI / N )1/2= 4.7 for N=25 m - slightly better than with the previous version  CSIx [m]  Dynamic Aperture is marginally sufficient for N=50 m  DA can be further increased with vertical nonlinear correctors (probably) MC Lattice Update - Y. Alexahin NFMCC Meeting Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  8. Plans (from MCDW09) 8 Lattice update including:  FF quads displacement to produce dipole field ~2T  Momentum compaction factor correction (making it slightly negative)  Arc magnet length reduction to get 10T bending field  even smaller circumference! Next steps:  Study the effect of magnet imperfections with Vadim Kashikhin’s magnet design  Possibility to change * in a wide range w/o changing the layout  Collimation system design (are special sections necessary?)  Study effects of fringe fields, add nonlinear correctors if necessary  Design orbit correction and tuning circuits  Study the effect of random misalignments and magnet imperfections done MC Lattice Update - Y. Alexahin NFMCC Meeting Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  9. Muon Collider Parameters 9 h z /  “Hour-glass factor” s (TeV) 1.5 3 Av. Luminosity / IP (1034/cm2/s) 1.25* 5 Max. bending field (T) 10 14 Av. bending field in arcs (T) 8.3 12 Circumference (km) 2.5 4 No. of IPs 2 2 Repetition Rate (Hz) 15 12 Beam-beam parameter / IP 0.087 0.087 * (cm) 1 0.5 Bunch length (cm) 1 0.5 No. bunches / beam 1 1 No. muons/bunch (1012) 2 2 Norm. Trans. Emit. (m) 25 25 Energy spread (%) 0.1 0.1 Norm. long. Emit. (m) 0.07 0.07 Total RF voltage (MV) at 800MHz 20230 + in collision / 8GeV proton 0.008 0.007 8 GeV proton beam power (MW) 4.8 4.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *) With increase by the beam-beam effect P – average muon beam power (~  ) – beam-beam parameter • C – collider circumference (~  if B=const) • – muon lifetime (~ ) • * – beta-function at IP MC Lattice Update - Y. Alexahin NFMCC Meeting Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  10. Final Focus Quads 11 Requirements adopted for this design:  full aperture 2A = 10sigma_max + 2cm (Sasha Zlobin wants + 1cm more)  maximum tip field in quads = 10T (G=200T/m for 2A=10cm)  bending field 8T in large-aperture open-midplane magnets, 10T in the arcs  IR quad length < 2m (split in parts if necessary!) a (cm) 5y 5x z (m) Gradient (T/m) 250 187 -131 -131 -89 82 Quench @ 4.5K 282 209 146 146 (with inner radius 5mm larger) Quench @ 1.9K 308 228 160 160 Margin @ 4.5K 1.13 1.12 1.12 Margin @ 1.9K 1.23 1.22 1.22  Is the margin sufficient? If not lower beam energy or increase * to allow for smaller aperture  We don’t need 5sigma+ half-aperture, 3sigma+ is enough: can accommodate N=50 m!  No dipole field from 6 to 16.5m, is it worthwhile to create ~2T by displacing the quads? MC Lattie Design - Y.Alexahin FNAL, November 11, 2009 MC Lattie Design - Y.Alexahin 3rd MCDW BNL December 3, 2009

More Related