1 / 27

Walther Penck (1888-1923)

Walther Penck (1888-1923). Morphological Analysis Of Landforms Translated (1953) by Hella Czech & Katharine Boswell From (1924) Die Morphologische Analyse. Walther Penck (1888-1923). Born in Vienna (1888) Son of Albrecht Penck. Walther Penck (1888-1923). Born in Vienna (1888)

ludwig
Download Presentation

Walther Penck (1888-1923)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Walther Penck (1888-1923) Morphological Analysis Of Landforms Translated (1953) by Hella Czech & Katharine Boswell From (1924) Die Morphologische Analyse

  2. Walther Penck (1888-1923) Born in Vienna (1888) Son of Albrecht Penck

  3. Walther Penck (1888-1923) Born in Vienna (1888) Son of Albrecht Penck • Professional Activities • University of Berlin • University of Heidelberg • Studied in Vienna • Direccion General de Minas (Buenos Aires) • Served with Germans in Alsace • Leipzig University • University of Constantinople (Istanbul) • Professorship at Agricultural College of Halkaly • Professor at University of Leipzig (unpaid) • *all before the age of 35 • Der sudrand der Puna de Atacama • (1920) based on 1912 field work • Morphological Analysis • published posthumously

  4. Walther Penck (1888-1923) Morphological Analysis Of Landforms Translated (1953) by Hella Czech & Katharine Boswell From (1924) Die Morphologische Analyse

  5. Nature of the Problem • 2. Basis, Nature and Aim of Morphological Analysis • The Problem • study of morphology goes beyond limits of geography • need to understand forces that produce land forms • ‘problem’ is that of crustal movement • 3 elements forming the substance of geomorphology • 1. Exogenetic Activity (destructive) • reduction and removal of rock • transport of sediment from higher to lower (gravity) • remove uneveness that endogenetic forces cause • require a surface to attack • Earth sculpture is due to exogenetic transference of material. The sum total of this constitutes denudation.” • 2. Edogenetic Forces (constructive) • originate within planet • creates relief and uneveness • independent of gravity forces (really?) • - all we know about them is from the effects they have produced • 3. Earth’s surface • - “is a limiting surface between different forces working in opposition to one another”

  6. Nature of the Problem/ • 2. Basis, Nature and Aim of Morphological Analysis • Nature of the Problem • 2. Basis, Nature and Aim of Morphological Analysis Morphological Study Seeks to understand the interaction between three factors (endogenetic, exogenetic, landforms) “Therefore it is possible to see plainly in the forms of denudation not merely the results of endogenetic and exogenetic transference of material; but even more that they owe their origin and their development to a relationship of forces, to the ratio of intensity between exogenetic and endogenetic processes. Discussion Point “Crustal movements cannot be observed directly, and no adequate tectonic method is known for ascertaining their characteristics. Thus in studying land forms, it is not permissible to make definite assumptions as to their course and development, and to base morphogenetic hypotheses upon them.” “Morphological analysis is this procedure of deducing the course and development of crustal movements from the exogenetic processes and the morphological features.”

  7. 3. Critical Survey Of Methods 3. Critical Survey of Methods Penck on Davis So what were Penck’s beefs with Davis? • does not include endogenetic processes • rapidly uplifted during which no denudation processes occur • once denudation processes begin, block remains at rest • (uplift and denudation are NOT successive processes) • applying a ‘special case’ as a ‘general rule’ • followers only see landforms as a realization of the cycle (misunderstanding Davis?) • (b) facts on which the assumptions are based • (a) deduction as a method of morphological research What are the main flaws Penck sees in the cycle of erosion? What, if anything, did Davis get right? How were Davis and Penck’s approaches to describing landscape development/processes fundamentally different?

  8. 3. Critical Survey Of Methods 3. Critical Survey of Methods • Davis on Penck • “He seems first to misunderstand a general scheme for a very limited, rigid, spechal scheme; and second equally determined to show how the work of an earlier time than his ought to have been done. • You do not mention A. Penck,….the father is as exasperating as the son.” • Excerpt from Chorley et al (1991) History of the Study of Landforms Or the Development of Geomorphology

  9. Critical Survey of Methods • (b) Relationship between endogenetic and exogenetic processes …it is essential, when investigating the origin and development of denudational forms as they appear at the earth’s surface, to ascertain the relationship between the intensity of the endogenetic and of the exogenetic processes, in short, between uplift and denudation; and it is necessary to follow out how this changes as time goes on.” What is his thought process leading up to this? “So long as uplift is at work, denudation cannot be idle.” “…the fundamental law of morphology: the modeling of the earth’s surface is determined by the ratio of the intensity of the endogenetic to that of the exogenetic displacements of material.” “But the relationship is not an unchanging one.” “…exogenetic happenings is subordinate to that of endogenetic processes” “Any change in kind or in intensity which these movements undergo must therefore – as has long been known – leave its traces upon the landscape.”

  10. cycle of erosion • Critical Survey of Methods • (c) The Differential Method

  11. Penck’s Key Points from Introduction • Uplift and denudation are NOT successive processes; denudation is concurrent with uplift • Crustal processes are important (but not observable…) • Ratio of the intensity of endogenetic and exogenetic processes is key • These intensities are constantly changing • There is no one successive generation of landscape forms

  12. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes Chapter 6: Development of Slopes SUMMARY OF SLOPE DEVELOPMENT SECTIONS • Form of slopes • The case of no incision (flattening of slopes) • 3-7. The case of active incision • Ratio of erosion intensity to denudation intensity

  13. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 1. Gradient and Form of Slopes

  14. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 2. Flattening of Slopes In the case of the cessation of incision (erosion), denudation proceeds….. Cliff-slope recedence and the development of the basal slope

  15. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 2. Flattening of Slopes “It is now quite clear that the process obeys a law: Flattening of slopes always takes place from below upwards” (p. 138) “If left undisturbed, a slope of any gradient whatsoever, provided it is uniform, becomes a slope system concave in profile” (p. 140) Cliff-slope recedence and the development of the basal slope and diminishing slope

  16. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes Chapter 6: Development of Slopes SUMMARY OF SLOPE DEVELOPMENT SECTIONS • Form of slopes • The case of no incision (flattening of slopes) • 3-7. The case of active incision • Ratio of erosion intensity to denudation intensity

  17. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes Chapter 6: Development of Slopes Slope Development Summary • All slopes form at the local base level and propagate upwards • 2. Erosion intensity controls gradient! • Convex slope = increase in erosion intensity (p. 150) • Concave slope = decrease in erosion intensity • Straight slope = no change • Amount of concavity or convexity indicates the rate of change

  18. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes Chapter 6: Development of Slopes Questions Q: How does Penck’s model of slope development compare to that of Davis?

  19. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes Chapter 6: Development of Slopes Questions • Q: Does Penck’s discussion of slope development follow the methodological theory he used to criticize Davis’ work (i.e., inductive vs. deductive)? • How does Penck rely on observation? “It is now possible to give a complete survey of the origin and development of slopes” p. 177

  20. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 4. Straight slope profiles. Uniform development. (p. 143) The cliff will recede from the river as the basal slope and diminishing slope form UNLESS there is….. “a constant ratio between the intensity of the denudation acting on the slope unit and the intensity of erosion by the stream”.

  21. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 4. Straight slope profiles. Uniform development. “If uniform development lasts sufficiently long, straight slope units are produced in every case.” (p. 148)

  22. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 5. Convex breaks of gradient (p. 150)

  23. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 7. Rates of Growth and Areas of Slope Units Erosion intensity increasing over time….. Intermediate slope units vanish as higher gradient slopes grow more quickly Results in more sharply convex breaks in gradient

  24. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 7. Rates of Growth and Areas of Slope Units Erosion intensity continually increasing over time.

  25. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 8. Rise in the general base level of denudation (p. 161)

  26. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 9. Influence exerted by rocks of heretogeneous character upon the development of slopes

  27. Chapter 6: Development of Slopes 9. Influence exerted by rocks of heretogeneous character upon the development of slopes

More Related