1 / 10

4 Principles of ESEA Flexibility

4 Principles of ESEA Flexibility. College-and-Career-Ready Expectations for All Students (  ) State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support (synthesizing feedback) Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership (  )

lumina
Download Presentation

4 Principles of ESEA Flexibility

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 4 Principles of ESEA Flexibility College-and-Career-Ready Expectations for All Students () State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support (synthesizing feedback) Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership () Reducing Duplication and Unnecessary Burden () January 2012

  2. For Principle 2 • Annual Measurable Objectives • Subgroups and differentiated targets • Priority, Focus and Reward Schools January 2012

  3. ESEA: AMO Issue 1 A B Recommended

  4. ESEA: AMO Issue 2 A B Recommended Draft Jan 3, 2012

  5. Gap Closure Gap Closure over time.

  6. Understanding New AMOs 100 - 57.6 means 42.4% are not proficient. Decrease by half in equal increments over 6-years means 42.4/2 = 21.2. 21.2point improvement over 6 years 21.2/6 ≈ 3.5 point increase every year

  7. Understanding New AMOs Two important results of this method are Acknowledges that subgroups have different starting points Differentiated targets are ambitious and feasible

  8. ESEA: Priority, Focus, & Reward Priority Focus Reward • Determined by • Reading + Math Performance Composite < 50 % in 2010-11 school year and one of the two previous years (2008-09 or 2009-10) • Graduation rate • < 60 % • Determined by • Schools with the largest in-school gaps for 2010-11 school year and one of the two previous years (2008-09 or 2009-10) • Above state average 38.7% • Title I schools with a subgroup with proficiency score below 50% for 2010-11 school year and one of the two previous years • Determined by • Poverty rate at or above 50% and gap between highest and lowest performing subgroups below state average and • Schools made AYP and all subgroups have performance composite above state performance composite and graduation rate, if any, above state graduation rate • or • Schools in the highest 10% performance composite progress and graduation rate progress, if any, for “all students” over a 2-year period.

  9. ESEA: Priority, Focus, & Reward Priority Focus Reward • ~127 Schools • ~80 Schools ~130 Schools

  10. 3 potential levels of support Intensive Support and Intervention Moderate Support and Intervention Independent with General Support

More Related