1 / 13

Test of EMU ISR System June-Sept 2000 at CERN ISR Tunnel

Test of EMU ISR System June-Sept 2000 at CERN ISR Tunnel. Goal : Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of < 200 m Demonstrate System Redundancy Test Setup : 1 SLM Line 1 Transfer Line 1 Transfer Plate Analog Sensors (Temp, Proximity) Analysis : 5000+ Events Taken

lydie
Download Presentation

Test of EMU ISR System June-Sept 2000 at CERN ISR Tunnel

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Test of EMU ISR SystemJune-Sept 2000 at CERN ISR Tunnel • Goal : • Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of < 200 m • Demonstrate System Redundancy • Test Setup : • 1 SLM Line • 1 Transfer Line • 1 Transfer Plate • Analog Sensors (Temp, Proximity) • Analysis : • 5000+ Events Taken • 1500+ Events Reconstructed • Conclusions are not final … • … but we are close !

  2. Prototype Test SetupJune-Sept 2000 at CERN ISR Tunnel • Assumptions : • Sensors et2, et3, and es10 are known • Transfer Plate definition is defined • Rotations of sensors are known within error • limits of photogrammetry

  3. COCOA Reconstruction Results(ISR Test Results – es10 Reference) SLM Line (Laser 302) Results of COCOA Reconstruction for July/August and September RunsUsing es10 as the Final Reference Sensor SLM Line (Laser 303) Results of COCOA Reconstruction for July/August and September RunsUsing es10 as the Final Reference Sensor

  4. COCOA Reconstruction Results(ISR Test Results – es9 Reconstruction) SLM Line (Laser 302) Results of COCOA Reconstruction for July/August and September RunsUsing es9 as the Final Reference Sensor SLM Line (Laser 303) Results of COCOA Reconstruction for July/August and September RunsUsing es9 as the Final Reference Sensor

  5. COCOA Reconstruction Results(ISR Test Results – es9 Reconstruction) Sample September Laser 302 Results (1 sensor) Sample September Laser 303 Results (1 sensor)

  6. COCOA Reconstruction ResultsGeneral Remarks • Note : • Large survey errors • 60 m local 120 m global • ~ 220 m Systematic Errors • < 15 m Statistical Errors • General Conclusions : • 4 CCD measurements on reference Sensors are critical • Reconstruction is roughly independent of laser choice (within error) • Reconstruction is independent of laser motions

  7. COCOA Reconstruction Results(Laser Independence) 30 pixels Distribution of raw CCD means in es4 during the July/August Run. Jump of 30 pixels = 420m Distribution of COCOA Reconstructed location of es4 in the ISR hall during the July/August Run. (y = 10 m, z = 8 m) Conclusion : Shift in Laser not seen in Reconstruction

  8. COCOA Reconstruction ResultsThoughts on COCOA • Comparison of COCOA Results to ‘Hand Calculations’ • We have verified operation in simple EMU type systems to < 100 m • We cannot verify in ISR EMU system to <400 m (rotations, calibration errors, transfer plate errors) • Evidence of COCOA Accuracy • Prediction of et3 dowel location direct from PG agrees within 10 m from CERN PG group determination • Prediction of et1-es1 separation on Transfer Plate within 30 m of CMM determination (full EMU simulation) • Concerns • Convergence of fit to local minima (false solutions) • Degenerate rotations possible

  9. COCOA Reconstruction ResultsThe Bottom Line (March 2001) • We can demonstrate reconstruction of sensor positions within 220 m of CERN PG • We can make redundant measurements • Real CMS Data Can Be Better Than March 2001 Results • 3 CCDs only on Reference Sensors (4 CCDs improve results) • Calibration Errors larger than expected, no calibration prior to installation (better results with better calibration) • More Constraints on COCOA Fits (Calibrated X-Hair Laser, Inclinometer Data on Transfer Plate)

  10. Extra Slides

  11. COCOA Reconstruction Results (ISR Test Results) Sample September Laser 302 Results (1 sensor) Sample September Laser 303 Results (1 sensor)

  12. COCOA Reconstruction Results(Laser Independence) FLAP takes raw data and finds centroid of charge distribution in each CCD Laser Instability : CDD centroids were found to ‘jump’. Problem can be traced to laser diode.

  13. FLAP Fitting Routines CCD Peaks in es9 from laser 302 … CCD Peaks in es9 from laser 303 taken immediately after laser 302 data…

More Related