1 / 36

OSSICULOPLASTY

OSSICULOPLASTY. Analysis of Results Dr.Jerry Halik MD FRCSC. N= 133 (Total-209) Age 5-71 Follow-up: up to 71 months(2 years average). Applebaum Incus Replacement Prosthesis(small). N = 28 Average age: 41 years (18-67)

lyle
Download Presentation

OSSICULOPLASTY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OSSICULOPLASTY Analysis of Results Dr.Jerry Halik MD FRCSC

  2. N= 133 (Total-209) • Age 5-71 • Follow-up: up to 71 months(2 years average)

  3. Applebaum Incus Replacement Prosthesis(small) • N = 28 • Average age: 41 years (18-67) • Average follow-up: 20 months(1-76)

  4. Applebaum Incus Replacement Prosthesis(small)- Pre-op Diagnosis • Chronic Otitis Media : 25(89%) • Cholesteatoma : 2 • Trauma : 1

  5. Applebaum Incus Replacement Prosthesis(small)-Types of Repair • Ossiculoplasty:12(43%) • Ossiculoplasty with Tympanoplasty :14(50%) • With canal wall down Mastoidectomy and Tympanoplasty:2 (7%)

  6. Applebaum Incus Replacement Prosthesis(small)-ResultsA-B closurePossible SRT<30 db:23 post op SRT <30dB:15/23(65%)

  7. Wehr’s 2.7mm Incus Replacement Prosthesis • N=29 • Average age:40 years(12-67) • Average follow-up:19 months(1-77)

  8. Wehr’s 2.7mm Incus Replacement Prosthesis-Pre-op Diagnosis • Chronic Otitis Media: 15 (52%) • Cholesteatoma: 9 (31%) • Malleus Head Fixation : 5(17%)

  9. Wehr’s 2.7mm Incus Replacement Prosthesis- Types of Repair • Ossiculoplasty:12 (41%) • Ossiculoplasty with Tympanoplasty: 10(34%) • With canal wall down Mastoidectomy and Tympanoplasty: 7(24%)

  10. Wehr’s 2.7mm Incus Replacement Prosthesis-Resultspossible SRT<30db:25 Post op SRT< 30dB:13/25(52%)A-B Closure

  11. Wehr’s 2.7mm Incus Replacement Prosthesis-Complications • Hearing worse: 3 (10%) • Hyperacusis: 1 (3%)

  12. Wehr’s mm Incus-Stapes Replacement Prosthesis • N=36 • Average age:34 years (5-67) • Average follow-up : 25 months(1-66)

  13. Wehr’s Incus-Stapes Replacement Prosthesis- Pre-op Diagnosis • Chronic Otitis Media : 16 (44%) • Cholesteatoma: 18 (50%) • Congenital malformation:2

  14. Wehr’s 2.7mm Incus-Stapes Replacement Prosthesis-Type of repair • Ossiculoplasty: 11(31%) • Ossiculoplasty with Tympanoplasty:13(36%) • With canal wall down Mastoidectomy and Tympanoplasty : 12(33%)

  15. Wehr’s Incus-Stapes Replacement Prosthesis- Resultspossible SRT<30db:32 Post op SRT< 30dB:19/32(59%)A-B Gap Closure * 1 overclosure

  16. Wehr’s 2.7mm Incus-Stapes Replacement Prosthesis-Complications • Hearing worse: 1 • Extrusion: 1 (4 years) • Dislocation: 1

  17. Malleus-Stapes Assembly • N=26 • Average age : 37 years (12-71) • Average follow-up:22 months(1-63)

  18. Malleus-Stapes Assembly-Pre-op Diagnosis • Chronic Otitis Media: 16 (62%) • Cholesteatoma:6 (23%) • Trauma: 1 • Malleus Head Fixation: 3

  19. Malleus-Stapes Assembly-Types of Repair • Ossiculoplasty: 12(46%) • Ossiculoplasty with Tympanoplasty:10(38%) • With canal wall down Mastoidectomy and Tympanoplasty: 4

  20. Malleus-Stapes Assembly-ResultsA-B gap closure Possible SRT<30dB :22 Post-op SRt<30dB: 11/22 (50%)

  21. Malleus-Stapes Assembly-Complications • Worse Hearing: 5(19%)

  22. Assemblies- Total (N=119) • Pre-op diagnosis • Chronic Otitis Media: 72(61%) • Cholesteatoma:35(29%) • Trauma:2 • Malleus Head Fixation:8 • Congenital:2

  23. Assemblies-Types of repair • Ossiculoplasty: 47 (39%) • Ossiculoplasty with Tympanoplasty:47(39%) • Ossicuplasty withTympanoplasty and canal wall down Mastoidectomy: 25(21%)

  24. Assemblies-ResultsA-B gap closurepossible SRT<30dB:102 Post op<30dB:58/102(57%) * 1 overclosure

  25. Assemblies-Complications • Hearing worse: 8(7%) • Hyperacusis: 1 • Extrusions: 1 • Dislocation: 1

  26. Torps and Porps • N=14 • Average age:40 years.(4-65) • Average follow-up:21 months(6-49)

  27. Torps and Porps- Pre-op Diagnosis • Chronic otitis media:8(57%) • Cholesteatoma: 4(29%) • Congenital malformation: 1 • Malleus head fixation:1

  28. Torps and Porps- Types of Repair • Ossiculoplasty:2 • Ossiculoplasty with Tympanoplasty:11(79%) • With canal wall down Mastoidectomy and Tympanoplasty : 1

  29. Torps and Porps- ResultsA-B gap closurepossible Sat<30dB:12 Post op Sat<30dB:4/12(25%)

  30. Torps and Porps: Complications • Extrusion:1(7%)

  31. Conclusions • Assemblies better than torp’s and porp’s(60% vs 25% success) • ?Effectiveness of malleus-stapes assembly • ?which prosthesis • Safe • Long term results problematic • Single stage procedures reasonable • ?Cost effective • ?Use of aids after failure

More Related