290 likes | 415 Views
A possible tetraquark state in heavy quarkonium decays. Shen Pengnian Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences shenpn@mail.ihep.ac.cn. Collaborators: F.K. Guo, H.C.Chiang, B.S.Zou, R.G.Ping. NSTAR’07, Bonn, Germany, 2007.9.5-8.
E N D
A possible tetraquark state in heavy quarkonium decays Shen Pengnian Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) Chinese Academy of Sciences shenpn@mail.ihep.ac.cn Collaborators: F.K. Guo, H.C.Chiang, B.S.Zou, R.G.Ping NSTAR’07, Bonn, Germany, 2007.9.5-8
Heavy quarkonium transition model and • a possible tetraquark state I. Motivation III. Further supports IV. remarks
I. Motivation multi-quark state hadron
interaction QCD theory NPQCDmodels - Potential model - Bag model - Lattice calculation - QCDSR, QFT existence of exotics enrich knowledge of QCD
77‘ Jaffe predicted multi-quark states R.Jaffe, Phys.Rev., D15(1977)267; Phys.Rev.Lett., 38(1977)195; hep-ph/0001123 • Recent years, many multi-quark states have been discussed Theoretically predicted not found ! R.Jaffee, Phys.Rev.Lett., 38(1977)195 Y.W.Yu, et al., High Ener.Phys.Nucl.Phys., 23(1999)859 P.N.Shen, et al., J.Phys.G25(1999)1807; Nucl.Phys.,A675(2000)234 Q.B.Li, et.al., Nucl.Phys., A683(2001)487 F.Wang, et al., Phys.Rev.,C51(1995)3411
Experimentally observed many new hadron states No definitive theoretical explanation yet! e.g. X(3872) E.S.Swanson, Phys.Rept., 429(2006)243 L.Maiani, et al., Phys.Rev.,D71(2005)014028 D.Ebert, et al., hep-ph/051230 Tetraquark ? if X(3872) is 1++ state charged X and 0++, 1+-, 2++ states but not found yet !
Y(4260) L.Maiani, et al., Phys.Rev.,D72(2005)031502 1st orbital excitation of ? DS(2317), DS(2460) Y.Q.Chen, X.Q.Li, Phys.Rev.Lett.,93(2004)232001 DS(2630) ? ? Y.Q.Chen, X.Q.Li, Phys.Rev.Lett.,93(2004)232001 ? L.Maiani, et al., Phys.Rev.,D70(2004)054009
strangelet Y.Zhang, R.K.Su, Phys.Rev.,C67(2003)015202; Mod.Phys.Lett.,A18(2003)143 X.J.Wen, et al., Phys.Rev.,C72(2005)015204 easy to form multi-quark cluster Question: whether a system with heavy quark (c or b quark) is easy to be bound ?
Chiral Unitary Approach (ChUA) J.A.Oller, et al., Nucl.Phys.,A620(1997)438 Key point: properly treat FSI between two pions • Heavy quarkonium transition model • and a possible tetraquark state • use coupled channel B-S equations T=V+VGT a unitarized t-matrix
use lowest order amplitude in PT as the kernel of coupled channel BSE Effective Lagrangian
decay amplitude resultant giare not self consistent cannot fit data
introduce X • full amplitude
Result F.K.Guo, et al., Nucl.Phys., A761(2005)269 transition
quantum numbers: quark contents: predicted X mass: width:
III. Further supports Theoretical support Constitute quark model J.Vijande, et al., Nucl.Phys., A790(2007)506c H.X.Zhang, et al., Chin.Phys.Lett., 24(2007)2533
QCD sum rules R.D.Matheus, et al., hep-ph/0705.1357 Current: Borel window: with c quark b quark Predicted mass:
Experimental support transition understanding of data Belle, hep-ex/0512034 BaBar, PRL96,232001(2006) hep-ex/0604031 Belle, hep-ex/0611026
Belle’s obsolete data Belle’s new data
Problems in fitting data with some theoretical models 1. The phase space region of the decay is large. , pions are not soft. 2. In this phase space region, scalar resonance f0(980) can couple to two pions, but it is not considered in the adopted theoretical models. 3. Neither the scalar particle σnor the FSI is considered.
Behavior of |M|2 with the 3-body phase space subtracted
IV. remarks X is a consequence of the heavy quarkonium transition data. Its quark contents are X is supported by QCD sum rule calculations, constituent quark model calculations and new experimental data. More accurate data are needed for further confirmation of X.