70 likes | 205 Views
GAL COMPETITION PROJECT UNITED STATES Institutional Performance Norms. Harry First, Eleanor Fox, and Daniel Hemli February 5, 2011. OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY. Overall investigations Merger review: a regulatory system agency clearance second requests: streamlining the process non-HSR reviews
E N D
GAL COMPETITION PROJECTUNITED STATESInstitutional Performance Norms Harry First, Eleanor Fox, and Daniel Hemli February 5, 2011
OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY • Overall investigations • Merger review: a regulatory system • agency clearance • second requests: streamlining the process • non-HSR reviews • Litigation time • FTC: too slow? new 2009 rules • DOJ: too slow? few cases, no criticism • no internal data
EXPERTISE • Staff • large staffs • economists: well-trained; integrated • DOJ: sometimes hires out for litigators • Leadership • DOJ: no formal qualifications • FTC Commissioners: sparse representation of economists or business executives • ALJs: appointment not controlled by FTC
TRANSPARENCY • Ex ante • guidelines • public workshops and speeches • advisory opinions/business review letters • Ex post • settlements: consent decrees/orders • closing statements • But what do you see?
ACCOUNTABILITY • Data availability • Executive branch control • removal of appointees • sporadic review of DOJ activities • Congressional control • legislation • budget • oversight • Judicial control: “the shadow of the law”
RULE OF LAW • Criminal enforcement • Constitutional constraints • Civil enforcement • variability when Administrations change • dominance of economics • Political concerns • political elections • political values
FLASHPOINTS • Merger review • Declinations • use of closing statements • Qualifications: ALJs • Institutional restructuring • DOJ as criminal cartel prosecutor • FTC as administrative agency