1 / 7

GAL COMPETITION PROJECT UNITED STATES Institutional Performance Norms

GAL COMPETITION PROJECT UNITED STATES Institutional Performance Norms. Harry First, Eleanor Fox, and Daniel Hemli February 5, 2011. OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY. Overall investigations Merger review: a regulatory system agency clearance second requests: streamlining the process non-HSR reviews

lyndon
Download Presentation

GAL COMPETITION PROJECT UNITED STATES Institutional Performance Norms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GAL COMPETITION PROJECTUNITED STATESInstitutional Performance Norms Harry First, Eleanor Fox, and Daniel Hemli February 5, 2011

  2. OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY • Overall investigations • Merger review: a regulatory system • agency clearance • second requests: streamlining the process • non-HSR reviews • Litigation time • FTC: too slow? new 2009 rules • DOJ: too slow? few cases, no criticism • no internal data

  3. EXPERTISE • Staff • large staffs • economists: well-trained; integrated • DOJ: sometimes hires out for litigators • Leadership • DOJ: no formal qualifications • FTC Commissioners: sparse representation of economists or business executives • ALJs: appointment not controlled by FTC

  4. TRANSPARENCY • Ex ante • guidelines • public workshops and speeches • advisory opinions/business review letters • Ex post • settlements: consent decrees/orders • closing statements • But what do you see?

  5. ACCOUNTABILITY • Data availability • Executive branch control • removal of appointees • sporadic review of DOJ activities • Congressional control • legislation • budget • oversight • Judicial control: “the shadow of the law”

  6. RULE OF LAW • Criminal enforcement • Constitutional constraints • Civil enforcement • variability when Administrations change • dominance of economics • Political concerns • political elections • political values

  7. FLASHPOINTS • Merger review • Declinations • use of closing statements • Qualifications: ALJs • Institutional restructuring • DOJ as criminal cartel prosecutor • FTC as administrative agency

More Related