1 / 16

Low-frequency noise A biophysical phenomenon

Low-frequency noise A biophysical phenomenon. Dr Mireille Oud medical physicist / consultant. (Congress “Sound, Vibrations, Air quality, Field & Building”, 6 November 2012, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands). 1 of 16. Contents. Sources low-frequency sound

lyndon
Download Presentation

Low-frequency noise A biophysical phenomenon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Low-frequency noiseA biophysical phenomenon Dr Mireille Oud medical physicist / consultant (Congress “Sound, Vibrations, Air quality, Field & Building”, 6 November 2012, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands) 1 of 16

  2. Contents • Sources low-frequency sound • Biophysics perceptibility(neurobiologist A.N. Salt, Washington University) • Health effects • Conclusions • Advices • References 2 of 16

  3. Sources low-frequency sound (<<150 Hz) Via air: up to 1 km • Wind turbines • Gas transport • District heating • Industry • Difference tones • … (Ref.: Kohlhase 2011) Via ground: up to 100 km  cumulation sources 3 of 16

  4. Sources low-frequency sound Wind turbines Gas grid (Ref.: Kennisportal Wind energy) (Source.: www.gasunie.nl) 4 of 16

  5. Biophysics perceptibility Organ of balance ______  ___  Cochlea (Ref.: Chittka & Brockmann 2005) (Ref.: Prasad) 5 of 16

  6. Biophysics perceptibility __________ Cochlea (Ref.: Encyclopaedia Brit. 1997) (Ref.: Madhero88) • Outer hair cells: pre-amplifier • Inner hair cells: to brain 6 of 16

  7. Biophysics perceptibility test animal test animal (Ref.: Salt 2011) • Can become • audible • Audible for every-one (Ref.: Pedersen 2008) 7 of 16

  8. Biophysics perceptibility • Occlusion helicotrema20dB increase sensitivity for low frequencies • Endolymfatic hydrops (swelling middle tube)  dizziness (Ref.: OpenLearn LabSpace) (Ref.: Salt & Lichtenhan 2012) 8 of 16

  9. Biophysics perceptibility response cochlea test animal • Audible cochlea-activity (500 Hz) interacts with inaudible cochlea-activity (5 Hz)low tone audible through amplitude modulation 5 Hz 500 Hz audible 5 Hz (Ref.: Salt & Lichtenhan 2011) 9 of 16

  10. Biophysics perceptibility • Low frequencies audible for everyone: beat, difference tone Superposition of nearly equal, audible, tones (a and b)this amplitude modulation can be acoustic (c) and neural (d) (Useful application: tuning musical instrument) a. mono 220 Hz b. mono 222 Hz c. mono 220 + 222 Hz d. stereo: left 220, right 222  (Click here, in presenting mode of powerpoint. Use head phone.) (Source: M. Oud 2012) 10 of 16

  11. Biophysics perceptibility G-weighting: ISO 7196:1995 (Ref.: Cedric 2004) weighted wind-turbine spectra (Ref.: Van den Berg 2006) •  dBC and dBG more realistic 11 of 16

  12. Health effects • Still more people perceive LFN (hearing / feeling) • Health effects LFN: • Dizziness • Continuous, pulsing pressure on head • Disturbed sleep • Stress • Raised blood pressure • Heart rhythm disorders • … 12 of 16

  13. Health effects Why is low-frequency sound experienced as nuisance? • Directionless, lacks spaciality  seems “within the head” • Character (monotonous or pulsing) & duration • Lack of autonomy (uncontrollable): ear plugs no effect: entrance is via bone conduction • Affects physiology (structure cochlea) 13 of 16

  14. Conclusions • Perception low-frequency sound been demonstrated objectively (audiograms) • Perception low-frequency sound biophysically explicable • Significant part NL-population experiences damage • Low-frequency sound requires different way of assessment:minimally dBC instead of dBA, preference dBG 14 of 16

  15. Advices • Systematic investigation health issues • More scientific research (medicine & physics) • Defining measurement and assessment methodology • Formulate norms for low-frequency sound • International approach • Makes sources low-frequency restricted • Adjustment home environment? 15 of 16

  16. Referenties • Dutch low-frequency noise vigilance group: www.laagfrequentgeluid.nl • Dr Mireille Oud: http://nl.linkedin.com/in/MireilleOud • Prof. A.N. Salt: http://tiny.cc/AlecSalt • ISO norm dBG: http://tiny.cc/ISO1 (ISO.org) and http://tiny.cc/ISO2 (DiracDelta science eng. enclyclopedia) • Berg, G.P. van den (2006), “The sound of high winds: the effect of atmospheric stability on wind turbine sound and microphone noise” Ph.D. thesis, Biomed. eng. dept. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen • Cedric R. (2004), “Ecoaccess guideline for the assessment of low frequency noise“, Proc. of Acoustics 2004, 619– 624, Gold Coast, Australia • Chittka L, Brockmann A (2005) Perception Space – The Final Frontier. PLoS Biol 3(4): e137. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030137 • Encyclopaedia Britannica (1997) “Cochlea” www.britannica.com • Kennisportal Wind energy on land (2011), “Bestaande windparken”, Min. Infrastructuur and Environment e.a. www.w-i-n-d.nl/ • Kohlhase S (2011), “Explaining buried pipeline induced LFN hum and gas turbine flutter …” Brookfield Ct, USA • Madhero88: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Madhero88 • OpenLearn Labspace, “Hearing – section 3.3 The role of the basilar membrane in sound reception” http://labspace.open.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=415643 • Pedersen C.S. (2008), “Human hearing at low frequencieswith focus on noise complaints”, Ph.D. thesis, Acoustics dept. of elec. systems, Aalborg University, Denmark • Prasad, “Mechanical cochlea”, senior design project, Stevens Inst. Techn. http://mechanicalcochlea.wordpress.com/home/the-cochlea/ • Salt A.N. (2011), “Processes underlying homeostasis of cochlear fluids”, Washington univ. http://oto2.wustl.edu/cochlea/WTPicton_salt_final.pdf • Salt, A.N. & Lichtenhan J.T. (2011), “ Responses of the inner ear to infrasound”, 4th Int. meeting on wind turbine noise, Rome • Salt, A.N. & Lichtenhan J.T. (2012), “Perception-based protection from low-frequency sounds may not be enough”, inter.noise 2012 New York 16 of 16

More Related