150 likes | 306 Views
Strategic Management. Macmillan and Tampoe OUP. Case Examples. BMW in 1999. The reasons for choosing BMW. The company is well known to most students in the UK The industry structure and challenges quite well understood
E N D
Strategic Management Macmillan and Tampoe OUP (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Case Examples BMW in 1999 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
The reasons for choosing BMW • The company is well known to most students in the UK • The industry structure and challenges quite well understood • It’s a sizable company but a minnow (table C3.1) in terms of global car production and sales. • Strong European and US brand image and customer base but faces tough decisions on how to move forward • Faced with many options – merge, get taken over, buy to grow, move into new segment, become specialist supplier, stay as now. • Interesting ownership structure. • Provides comparison with Japanese companies who have moved into the UK to spread their wings in Europe (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Critical Strategic Issues • Car industry converging into mega-corporations where size seems to be the determining factor • BMW very small in comparison to top five (see table C3.1) • Can it survive by staying roughly the same size, selling their extremely successful and sought after high margin cars to discerning customers? • If not, how can it grow? • How can it retain current ownership structure so that major shareholders do not see their ownership diluted or lose control of the company? (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Consequences of a growth strategy • Can it exploit its core competence in new markets? • Can it modify its ethos to match new markets? • Should it abandon its proven competence and approach to business? • How does it choose a new approach? • Should it seek to develop a new customer base with wider potential sales? • Should it spread its brand over wider range of products? • How will it counter threats to its new approach? • How will it position itself vis-a-vis it chosen competition? (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Strengths pre-Rover acquisition • Company ranked among the more admired companies in the auto industry • Its chief executive a respected industry and national figure with the industry in his blood • Customers are loyal to the brand • 5 series is considered the benchmark for the executive car market • Profitable • Perceived to be invincible • Company announces expansion plans by buying Rover from BAe in the UK (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Possible causes of BMW success • Its aircraft and motorcycle heritage of quality and driveability • Its ability to deliver high value, reliable, consistent quality • Its ownership structure (see page 306) • Its quality of management which was ranked very high • Its marketing ability which positioned it as the epitome of the best and most desirable products in the industry (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Post-Rover Acquisition • Inherited a range of products to exploit a slightly different market segment and customer • Required huge ongoing investment to get production facilities and product to meet BMW standards • Attempting to improve Rover’s share of its home market • UK acquisition draining finance and management time and effort • What they got was not what they thought they were buying • BMW itself had competing products in its pipeline • UK acquisition sours (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Untangling its investment • Chief executive and his second in command leave the company • Divided the roles and appointed a chief executive • Went in search of a new chairman • Sold its UK subsidiary for £1 • Returned to its knitting having written-off £billions of investment in the UK • Harmed its reputation in the UK for a short time (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Causes of BMW failure to exploit Rover • Was it the strategy or the implementation of the strategy? • Was it shifts in shape and structure of the industry which was going through a major reshuffle? • Was it failure to tackle the structural issues to do with organisation, management controls, and culture of Longbridge works? • Was it because Rover image did not appeal to the emerging generation – too associated with their parents and grand parents – ‘uncool’? • Was it arrogance and complacency? (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Question 1 – Survival in global car industry • Obviously the BMW board felt that it had to grow in size and widen its appeal to survive as a independent producer of quality cars • Its 3 and 5 series car were selling very well. There were new models in the offing (MX5, Z3, Z8 new 3 Series) • Expanding volume in its own products could cause oversupply and result in diminution of market appeal with knock-on effect on residuals and exclusivity • Growth route chosen was one that protects own brand and widens scope by entering mass market • It decided to do this by acquisition of an ailing company but one that sold to a different market • It felt that it could inject its ‘magic’ to Rover (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Question 2 – Growing the business • Choices were organic growth, alliances and/or acquisitions • Organic growth too slow to match pace set by other major players who were buying into niche markets • Few partners with whom to form alliance • Fewer still available for purchase • Choice meant two things – deciding the route and then picking the target (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Question 2 – The way ahead • By the time BMW took the decision to buy Rover its choices had diminished because Ford, and GM had acquired many desirable brands such as Volvo, Jaguar • VW had acquired lesser brands such as Skoda and SEAT and then a prestige brand in Bentley and Rolls Royce • Mergers and alliance opportunities were in France with Renault or Japan with Nissan, also South Korea • BMW may not have had the management expertise to work with non-European manufacturers • BMW woke up too late and found itself with only Rover as an acquisition opportunity (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Question 3 – Making a Success of Rover • Point out that the ‘devil is in the detail’ • Implementation should take consideration of survival and also quality improvement • Change culture first before throwing money at the business • Protect BMW at all costs • Do not try to make Rover equivalent to BMW as it is a different product in a different market • Rationalise product range • i.e., keep Mini and Range- Rover - Kill the rest (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Question 4 – Rover In hindsight • Still a good buy? • Product range complementary to BMW • Offered entry to new market • Opportunity to learn how to emulate VW, Skoda, Seat as way forward • Reap before re-investment (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001