Pedagogies for Diversity and Their Affect on Retention

1. Pedagogies for Diversityand Their Affect on Retention Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota ksmith@umn.edu http://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith Collaboration for the Advancement of College Teaching and Learning Workshop for the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology November 2006

2. Retention Progress Report -- Keys to Success -- JEE Academic Bookshelf – Leaving Pedagogies of Engagement Keys to Success in College: Strategies forIncreasing Student Retention

3. Retention Progress Report Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences by Elaine Seymour & Nancy M. Hewitt Westview, 430 pages, 1997. Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (Second edition) by Vincent Tinto University of Chicago Press, 1993, 296 pages. The Chilly Classroom Climate: A Guide to Improve the Education of Women by Bernice Resnick Sandler, Lisa A. Silverberg & Roberta M. Hall National Association for Women in Education, 125 pages, 1996.

4. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences "Field switching is only the tip of an iceberg: The same set of problems that prompt some science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduates to leave make persistence difficult for those who stay." (Cover jacket). "Contrary to the common assumption that most switching is caused by personal inadequacy in the face of academic challenge, one strong finding is the high proportion of factors cited as significant in switching decisions which arise either from structural or cultural sources within institutions, or from students' concerns about their career prospects (p. 32)." The four most commonly cited concerns leading to switching decisions (also cited by between 31 and 74 percent of the non-switchers) were: 1. Lack or loss of interest in science 2. Belief that a non-S.M.E. major holds more interest, or offers a better education 3. Poor teaching by S.M.E. faculty 4. Feeling overwhelmed by the pace and load of curriculum demands.

5. Students' voices: I do work hard, and my average load over these four years--even when I was transferring out--has been 17, 18 hours a semester, plus a couple of night classes sometimes. It doesn't really bother me to work that hard. But when it's a concept I don't understand and I go to get help from faculty and they just don't give it, that's discouraging. (Male white engineering switcher) What bothers me is the number of people who know what engineering is about, and really have the capability to do well and be good in the field, but end up going a different way for reasons other than the lack of ability. (Female white engineering non-switcher). You get people that would probably do well if they were given half a chance, but there's so much competition, and not a heck of a lot of help. (Female black engineering senior). The first two years in physics are so dull. I mean, they have absolutely nothing to do with what you'll be doing later. I'm afraid that's why you might be losing good students from engineering that are really qualified and have the intelligence. . .There are ways to make the introductory material interesting so that it doesn't drive away good people through boredom. (Male white engineering non-switcher).

6. Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition "More students leave their college or university prior to degree completion than stay." Individual departure from institutions of higher education arises from several major causes or roots: intention commitment adjustment difficulty congruence isolation obligations finances Student departure takes two forms, academic dismissal and voluntary withdrawal, the latter being much more common. For most departures, leaving has little to do with the inability to meet formal academic requirements or finances. Student departure primarily appears to result from what goes on in the daily interactions between students and faculty inside and outside the classroom.

7. The Chilly Classroom Climate: A Guide to Improve the Education of Women "Women as well as men may often treat women in ways that not only discourage their classroom participation but also lessen their self- esteem and vocational aspirations." Men and women, sitting side by side in the classroom, often have very different experiences, because faculty members may unwittingly treat them differently. Teachers can inhibit women's full participation by such behaviors as: 1.Doubting women's accomplishments, for example, attributing their achievements to "luck" or "affirmative action" but men's to "talent" or "ability" 2.Responding more extensively to men's in-class comments with praise, criticism, or coaching but to women's with "uh-huh." 3.Assuming that women who ask for help do not know the material but that men who ask are smart, inquisitive, and involved. 4.Praising men for their work and abilities and women for their appearance.

8. Tinto's principles of effective retention: 1.Effective retention programs are committed to the students they serve. They put student welfare ahead of other institutional goals. 2.Effective retention programs are first and foremost committed to the education of all, not just some, of their students. 3.Effective retention programs are committed to the development of supportive social and educational communities in which all students are integrated as competent members. Commonalities of effective retention commitments: $enduring commitment to student welfare $a broader commitment to the education, not mere retention, of all students $an emphasis upon the importance of social and intellectual community in the education of students.

9. "Although programs can be most helpful, they cannot replace the absence of a high quality, caring, and concerned faculty and staff. Institutions should therefore not be misled by the use of modern technology and marketing strategies. . .The road to institutional commitment and thus to student commitment does not require very elaborate or high- cost interventions. . .Rather, effective retention calls for sustained effort of the part of all institutional members to give to each and every student serious and honest attention on a daily basis. It requires, if you will, a continuing commitment to the education of students. No technology, however sophisticated, can replace that sort of commitment (Tinto, p. 201)."

10. Student Retention Requires Maintaining a Creative Tension Between Challenge and Security Pelz, Donald, and Andrews, Frank. 1966. Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Pelz, Donald. 1976. Environments for creative performance within universities. In Samuel Messick (Ed.), Individuality in learning, pp. 229-247. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

11. Pegadogies of Engagement: Using Cognitive Science to Design Instruction for Diverse Learners “If we cannot end now our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity.” President John F. Kennedy, Commencement Address, American University, June 10, 1963. Cited in Harlan Cleveland, Nobody in charge: Essays on the future of leadership, Jossey-Bass, 2002.

12. Age of Interdependence Tom Boyle of British Telecom calls this the age of interdependence; he speaks of the importance of people’s NQ, or network quotient – their capacity to form connections with one another, which, Boyle argues is now more important than IQ, the measure of individual intelligence. Cohen, Don & Prusak, Laurence. 2001. In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

13. Platform for Collaboration • (1st Three Flatteners): • 11/9/89 • 8/9/95 • Work Flow Software Horizontalize NYTimes MAGAZINE April 3, 2005It's a Flat World, After All By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN Video – Think Global Series: http://minnesota.publicradio.org/radio/features/2005/05/collaboration/

14. The great question of this new century is whether the age of interdependence is going to be good or bad for humanity. The answer depends upon whether we in the wealthy nations spread the benefits and reduce the burdens of the modern world, on whether the poor nations enact the changes necessary to make progress possible, and on whether we all can develop a level of consciousness high enough to understand our obligations and responsibilities to each other.

15. JD Edwards Ad from Time Magazine, 9/00

16. Pedagogies of Engagement

17. Lila M. Smith

18. Lila M. Smith

19. Foundations forPedagogies of Engagement • Learning is a social activity (John Dewey) • Innovative learning requires ambiguity (Stuart Pugh) • All learning requires un-learning (John Seely Brown) • Learning is situated (Jean Lave)

20. Foundations - John Dewey John Dewey’s ideal school: •a “thinking” curriculum aimed at deep understanding •cooperative learning within communities of learners •interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary curricula •projects, portfolios, and other “alternative assessments” that challenged students to integrate ideas and demonstrate their capabilities. Dewey, John. 1915. The school and society, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

21. Challenging and Supportive Learning Environments A Cooperative Learning Model

22. Cooperative Learning •Positive Interdependence •Individual and Group Accountability •Face-to-Face Promotive Interaction •Teamwork Skills •Group Processing

23. Cooperative Learning Research Support Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. 1998. Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30 (4), 26-35. • Over 300 Experimental Studies • First study conducted in 1924 • High Generalizability • Multiple Outcomes Outcomes 1. Achievement and retention 2. Critical thinking and higher-level reasoning 3. Differentiated views of others 4. Accurate understanding of others' perspectives 5. Liking for classmates and teacher 6. Liking for subject areas 7. Teamwork skills

24. Small-Group Learning: Meta-analysis Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. 1999. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-52. Small-group (predominantly cooperative) learning in postsecondary science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET). 383 reports from 1980 or later, 39 of which met the rigorous inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The main effect of small-group learning on achievement, persistence, and attitudes among undergraduates in SMET was significant and positive. Mean effect sizes for achievement, persistence, and attitudes were 0.51, 0.46, and 0.55, respectively.

25. Strategies for Energizing Large Classes: From Small Groups to Learning Communities: Jean MacGregor, James Cooper, Karl Smith, Pamela Robinson New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 81, 2000. Jossey- Bass

26. The Harvard Assessment Seminars - Richard J. Light All the specific findings point to, and illustrate, one main idea. It is that students who get the most out of college, who grow the most academically, and who are the happiest, organize their time to include interpersonal activities with faculty members, or with fellow students, built around substantive, academic work. Environmental Factors That Enhance Students= Academic and Personal Development and Satisfaction Alexander Astin in What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass, 1993. Student-student interaction Student-faculty interaction A faculty that is very student-oriented Discussing racial/ethnic issues with other students Hours devoted to studying B Time on task Tutoring other students Socializing with students of different race/ethnicity A student body that has high socioeconomic status An institutional emphasis on diversity A faculty that is positive about the general education program A student body that values altruism and social activism

27. Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology – National Science Foundation, 1996 Goal B All students have access to supportive, excellent undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology, and all students learn these subjects by direct experience with the methods and processes of inquiry.

28. Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology Goal B All students have access to supportive, excellent undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology, and all students learn these subjects by direct experience with the methods and processes of inquiry. Recommend that SME&T faculty: Believe and affirm that every student can learn, and model good practices that increase learning; starting with the student=s experience, but have high expectations within a supportive climate; and build inquiry, a sense of wonder and the excitement of discovery, plus communication and teamwork, critical thinking, and life-long learning skills into learning experiences.

29. Goals and Objectives Instruction Effective Course Design (Felder & Brent, 1999) EC 2000 Bloom’s Taxonomy Course-specific goals & objectives Classroom assessment techniques Technology Cooperative learning Students Assessment Other experiences Tests Other measures Lectures Labs

30. Desired Attributes of a Global Engineer* • A multidisciplinary, systems perspective, along with a product focus • An awareness of the boundaries of one’s knowledge, along with an appreciation for other areas of knowledge and their interrelatedness with one’s own expertise • An awareness of and strong appreciation for other cultures and their diversity, their distinctiveness, and their inherent value • A strong commitment to team work, including extensive experience with and understanding of team dynamics • High ethical standards (honesty, sense of personal and social responsibility, fairness, etc) • An ability to think both critically and creatively, in both independent and cooperative modes • *A Manifesto for Global Engineering Education, Summary Report of the Engineering Futures Conference, January 22-23, 1997. The Boeing Company & Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

31. Safe for Diversity The required solvent for civilization is respect for differences. The art is to be different together. Civilization will be built by cooperation and compassion, in a social climate in which people of different groups can deal with each other in ways that respect their cultural differences. Harlan Cleveland, Nobody in charge: Essays on the future of leadership, Jossey-Bass, 2002.