360 likes | 495 Views
Bias and Uncertainty of NADP Total Inorganic Nitrogen Measurements Greg Wetherbee Mark Rhodes U.S. Geological Survey NADP Program Office - TDEP Committee Meeting Spring 2013. NTN vs CAPMoN UofI statistics students USGS Bucket sampling vs bag sampling USGS field audit
E N D
Bias and Uncertaintyof NADP Total Inorganic Nitrogen MeasurementsGreg Wetherbee Mark RhodesU.S. Geological Survey NADP Program Office-TDEP Committee Meeting Spring 2013
NTN vs CAPMoN UofI statistics students USGS Bucket sampling vs bag sampling USGS field audit Collocated equipment studies ACM vs ACM collector ACM vs N-CON collector Confidence Intervals
PA15 CAPMoN MIC / MICB NADP ACMs
AIRMoN and NTN Aerochem Metrics 301 CAPMoN MIC
grid sensor AIRMoN and NTN grid sensor CAPMoN
CAPMoN / NADP Co-located Sites • CAPMoN • Daily samples • No Filtration • “Sterile” bag liner in bucket with no transfer to bottles. • MIC opens earlier than ACM at ppt onset • NADP • Weekly samples • Filtered • “DI-cleaned” reuseable buckets (and bottles) are not sterilized • ACM 7-grid sensor
CAPMoN / NADP Co-located Sites • CAPMoN • Analysis by Environment Canada • Science and Technology Branch, Dorsett, Ontario • NADP • Analysis by Illinois State Water Survey • Central Analytical Laboratory, Champaign, IL • Laboratories compare very well! • USGS interlaboratory-comparison program
PA15 CAPMoN – NTN Correlation Values • SO42-: 0.9606 N=1,060 records • NO3-: 0.9296 N=1,060 records • NH4+: 0.843 4 N=1,049 records UofI statistics students 2013 analysis for PA15
How does weekly field exposure of samples affect [N]inorganic? USGS Field Audit Program Results
LOSS CONTAMINATION FIELD AUDIT Nitrate LOSS & CONTAMINATION
Will new N-CON Collectors affect N deposition estimates? Yes
Nitrate CA50 & MA01 ACM ACM N-CON N-CON
Ammonium CA50 & MA01 ACM ACM N-CON N-CON
2012 Co-located Results N-CON ACM
2012 Co-located Results N-CON ACM
USGS Co-Located Sampler Sites CAN5 OR02 MA01 WI98 CA76 CA50 CO98 CO02 CO00 NM07 AZ03 OK00 TX22 Sites not included in Wetherbee, et al., 2004
The Math Step 1: Calculate 2-sample relative standard deviations for co-located total annual N deposition measurements. Step 2: Compute the average of the 2-sample relative standard deviations for many co-located sites.
Step 3: “Wetherbee’s” Minimum Resolvable Difference Estimator (md) md = .
Confidence Limits CLUpper = md ×Annual Dissolved Inorganic N (kg/ha) CLLower = Annual Dissolved Inorganic N (kg/ha) ÷md Confidence Interval = CLUpper - CLLower
Take-Home Messages Consider data uncertainty for evaluation of critical loads. Inorganic N annual deposition md values 1.254 95% confidence, 1.209 90% confidence, and 1.159 80% confidence
Summary • NADP inorganic N uncertainty = +25% with 95% confidence. • NADP inorganic N contamination happens, but loss is more common - possibly enhanced in regions with fog & drizzle precip types. • CAPMoNNinorg > NADP Ninorg by approximately 15% due to many factors.
Summary • Bag sampling could help preserve Ninorg . • N-CON collector data will predominantly shift [Ninorg ] possitively, but perhaps not for all sites.