880 likes | 1.05k Views
Biologics License Application: Recombinant Human Activated Protein C (rhAPC) [drotrecogin alfa (activated)] Xigris ™ for Severe Sepsis. Anti-Infective Advisory Committee October 16, 2001 FDA/CBER. Sponsor’s Proposed Indication.
E N D
Biologics License Application: Recombinant Human Activated Protein C (rhAPC)[drotrecogin alfa (activated)] Xigris™ for Severe Sepsis Anti-Infective Advisory Committee October 16, 2001 FDA/CBER
Sponsor’s Proposed Indication rhAPC is indicated for the treatment of pediatric and adult patients with sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction (severe sepsis). Treatment with rhAPC reduces mortality in patients with severe sepsis.
Overview of Drotrecogin Product Development • 13 phase 1 studies: • 8 studies healthy volunteers (110 patients) • 3 studies end-stage renal disease (30 patients) • 1 study heterozygous Protein C deficiency (9 patients) • 1 study Purpura fulminans (42 patients)
Overview of Drotrecogin Product Development • 1 study, phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 131 patients with severe sepsis • 1 study, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 1690 patients with severe sepsis • Pediatric study in 83 patients with severe sepsis • Ongoing, uncontrolled trials in > 500 patients
Study Design:Phase 2 Study • Randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, multicenter • 131 patients with severe sepsis • rhAPC: 12, 18, 24 or 30 ug/kg/hr continuous iv infusion 48 or 96 hours • Outcome measures • Pharmacodynamic & pharmacokinetic • Safety
Results:Phase 2 Study Phase 3 dose chosen based on PD effects on D-dimers in phase 2
Study Design:Phase 3 Study • Randomized, double-blind, single dose, placebo-controlled, multicenter study • rhAPC: 24 ug/kg/hr iv infusion for 96 hours • 2280 patients planned for enrollment • Inclusion: Severe sepsis • 3 of 4 SIRS criteria • 1 organ failure • Suspected or proven infection • Exclusion: patients at high risk for bleeding
Study Design:Final Statistical Analysis Plan • Primary efficacy endpoint: 28 day all cause mortality • Primary efficacy analysis: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by preinfusion: • APACHE II quartile • Age class • Protein C activity class • 2 interim analyses: • 760 patients (alpha level=0.0002), October 1999 • 1520 patients (alpha level=0.0118), June 2000
Study Design: Prospectively Defined Secondary Analyses • Mortality treatment effect by: • Protein C levels • APACHE II • Age • Gender, origin • SOFA, SIRS • Organ Failure • Shock, ARDS, DIC • AT III levels
Results:Demographics Disease Severity *Time from 1st OF to start drug 18 hours 17 hours
Results:Primary Efficacy Endpoint ITT Population 100 80 60 SURVIVAL (%) 40 20 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 TIME (Days) Placebo rhAPC
Review of Mortality Effect by Patient Subgroups • Patient age • Disease severity • APACHE II • Organ failure • Shock • Hematologic parameters • Protein C • DIC • Use of heparin
Review of Mortality Effect by Patient Subgroups • Patient age • Disease severity • APACHE II • Organ failure • Shock • Hematologic parameters • Protein C • DIC • Use of heparin
APACHE II: Disease severity • Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (Knaus 1985) • Index used to predict mortality in ICU setting • Uses physiologic measurements, age and chronic health status
Results:Mortality as a Function of APACHE II at Study Entry interaction p = 0.09
Results:Mortality as a Function Disease Severity (Organ Failure)
Results:Summary of Treatment Effect by APACHE II & Organ Failure & Shock ALL PATIENTS APACHE - Q1 APACHE - Q2 APACHE - Q3 APACHE - Q4 OF - 1 OF - 2 OF - 3 OF - 4 OF - 5 SHOCK - Absent SHOCK - Present 0.1 1 10 rhAPC Better Placebo Better
Review of Mortality Effect by Patient Subgroups • Patient age • Disease severity • APACHE II • Organ failure • Shock • Hematologic parameters • Protein C • DIC • Use of heparin
Results: Mortality in Patients with Laboratory Evidence of DIC
Review of Mortality Effect by Patient Subgroups • Patient age • Disease severity • APACHE II • Organ failure • Shock • Hematologic parameters • Protein C • DIC • Use of heparin
Results:Functional Status at Day 28 100% 24.7 30.8 80% 12.2 DIED 9.8 60% ICU 23.5 Hosp 20.9 NursHome 40% 7.2 7.9 Home 20% 32.3 30.6 0% rhAPC PLACEBO
Protocol Amendment • June 1999-after trial initiated • Sponsor blinded • Before 1st interim analysis • Primary Analytic Plan • Elimination of PC deficiency status and septic shock as covariates from the CMH analysis • Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria • Esophageal varices • Cirrhosis • Transplant patients • Moribund patients • Pancreatitis • Malignancy • Definition of OF
Effect of Protocol Change: Original vs. Amended Protocol • ↓malignancy (21% vs 16%) • ↓ immunosuppressed (11% vs. 8%) • ↓ withdrawal of life support (17% vs. 13%) • ↓ APACHE II chronic health points (25% vs. 17%) • ↓ non-sepsis related death (5% vs. 4%) • ↓ at nursing home facilities (8% vs. 6%)
Effect of Protocol Change:Original vs. Amended Protocol • Higher Il-6 median levels in amended (566 ug/ml vs. 389 ug/ml ) • Mean APACHE II scores same at baseline (25) • Acidosis more common under original protocol than amended (46% vs. 26%)
rhAPC N (%) Placebo N (%) Original 57 (16) 64 (18) Amendment A 50 (10) 79 (16) Effect of Protocol Change: DNR Orders
Sensitivity Analysis: Patients on Pre-Amendment Not Eligible Under Post-Amendment
Summary of Efficacy • 28 day all cause mortality 24.7% rhAPC vs. 30.8% placebo (p=0.005)
Summary of Efficacy • Additional analyses suggest treatment benefit predominant: • 3rd and 4th APACHE II quartile • laboratory evidence DIC • not on heparin • > 50 years of age • ≥ 2 OF • shock
Outline of Presentation • Pediatrics • Adult safety phase 2 • Adult safety phase 3 • Immunogenicity • Summary
Pediatric Database No controlled efficacy trials Total Pediatric data base - 121 pts • Safety PK/PD sepsis study - 83 pts. • Purpura Fulminans - 14 pts. • Additional uncontrolled trials - 24 pts.
Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3 Type of Organ Failure (% of Patients)
Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3 # of Organ Failures (% of Patients)
Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3 Primary Site of Infection (% of Patients)
Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3 Type of Pathogen (% of Patients)