120 likes | 464 Views
Computers As Social Actors. Presented by Paul Aumer-Ryan School of Information The University of Texas. Introduction. Computers As Social Actors (CASA) Umbrella field: Affective design Related terminology Research hot spots (Stanford, MIT). Background. Aristotle & Descartes
E N D
Computers As Social Actors Presented by Paul Aumer-Ryan School of Information The University of Texas
Introduction • Computers As Social Actors (CASA) • Umbrella field: Affective design • Related terminology • Research hot spots (Stanford, MIT)
Background • Aristotle & Descartes • Rational vs. emotional mind • Research implications of this dichotomy • Behaviorism and cognitivism • Mechanistic aspects of human mind • Input-output paradigm • Reversal: Affective design
History 1984 The second self: Computers & the human spirit (Turkle) 1993 Anthropomorphism, agency, & ethopoeia (Nass, Steuer, Tauber) 1994 Computers are social actors (Nass, Steuer, Tauber) 1996 The media equation (Reeves & Nass) 1997 Affective computing (Picard) 1998 CAPTology (Fogg) 2004 Emotional design (Norman)
History 1984 The second self: Computers & the human spirit (Turkle) 1993 Anthropomorphism, agency, & ethopoeia (Nass, Steuer, Tauber) 1994 Computers are social actors (Nass, Steuer, Tauber) 1996 The media equation (Reeves & Nass) 1997 Affective computing (Picard) 1998 CAPTology (Fogg) 2004 Emotional design (Norman)
History 1984 The second self: Computers & the human spirit (Turkle) 1993 Anthropomorphism, agency, & ethopoeia (Nass, Steuer, Tauber) 1994 Computers are social actors (Nass, Steuer, Tauber) 1996 The media equation (Reeves & Nass) 1997 Affective computing (Picard) 1998 CAPTology (Fogg) 2004 Emotional design (Norman)
Intermission • “All interfaces, however badly developed, have personality” (Topffer’s law) • Computers are morally responsible for an error (Friedman & Millett, 1997)
Criticisms • Use of recorded human voice • Multifunction computer, multiple personalities? • Computers as social beings, or as social imposters? • Does it matter? • Since computers are interactive, it’s natural to treat them socially • Anthropomorphizing and the metaphorical act • Books are media, too
Assumptions • Philosophical viewpoint: • Social constructivist • Often anti-cognitivist/behaviorist • Media as information-as-thing? • Emotion as information-as-thing?
Questions • Machines with “souls”? • The appropriateness of treating a tool like a social being • Are emotionally intelligent tools worthwhile? • Anthropomorphism: when is the metaphor just a metaphor?
Conclusions • Computers As Social Actors • Roots in the 1980s • Formalized in the 1990s • Diversifying in the 2000s