460 likes | 588 Views
IHE Faculty. Achieving Students. IU. IU. K-12 Teachers. Network Connections. Math & Science Collaborative November 5, 2009. Achieving Students. Achieving Students. Welcome.
E N D
IHE Faculty Achieving Students IU IU K-12 Teachers Network Connections Math & Science Collaborative November 5, 2009 Achieving Students Achieving Students
Welcome • Network Connections as a “Conference within” the 58th Annual Meeting of PA Council of Teachers of Mathematics • MSC is pleased to partner with PCTM and to be supporting fees for Thursday participation for all SW PA educators • “Rivers of Knowledge Meet at the Point” • Exploring the connections between mathematics and science
Update on Latest in Math and Science International Reports National Reports Local Innovation State Initiatives PowerPoint will be available on MSC website tomorrow.
Update on Latest: International Report U.S. Performance Across International Assessments of Student Achievement: Special Supplement to The Condition of Education (August 2009) Summarizes three international studies involving more than a million students in 85 countries: Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2009/analysis/
Special Supplement to The Condition of Education (August 2009): Findings In mathematics, results from the 2007 TIMSS assessment show that U.S. students have improved at both grades 4 and 8 since the first administration of TIMSS in 1995. PISA 2006 results suggest that U.S. 15-year-olds: are not as successful in applying mathematics knowledge and skills to real-world tasks as their peers in many other developed nations. The mathematics average score placed U.S. 15-year-olds in the bottom quarter of participating developed nations, a position unchanged from 2003.
Special Supplement to The Condition of Education (August 2009): Findings In science, results from TIMSS 2007 assessment show U.S. 4th graders and 8th graders have fallen behind their peers in several countries, even though their average scores in science have not declined since the first administration of TIMSS in 1995. Grade 4: among the other 15 countries that participated in the 1995 and 2007 TIMSS, the average science score: Increased in seven (7) countries Decreased in five (5) countries. At grade 8, the average science score among the other 18 countries participating in both 1995 and 2007: increased in five (5) countries Decreased in three (3) countries.
Special Supplement to The Condition of Education (August 2009): Findings In science, PISA 2006 results suggest that U.S. 15-year-olds: average science literacy score of 489 was well below the OECD average of 500, indicating that they are not as successful in applying science knowledge and skills to real-world tasks as their peers in many other developed nations. Students in 16 of the 29 other countries outperformed the US, placing U.S. 15-year-olds in the bottom third of participating developed nations.
Update on Latest: National Reports June 2009: The Opportunity Equation July 2009: Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow Innovation in Pittsburgh’s Workforce October 2009: NAEP Mathematics Scores October 2009: Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making (NCTM)
Opportunity Equation (June 2009) The Opportunity Equation: Transforming Mathematics and Science Education for Citizenship and the Global Economy Commission on Mathematics and Science Education, Institute for Advanced Study, Carnegie Corporation of New York Executive Summary is included in the Journal. (pp. 14-18). How many familiar with it?
Opportunity Equation (22 Authors) President, National Academies of Science President, Carnegie Corporation CEOS of Several Businesses Exec of Council of Chief State School Officers Governor of Rhode Island Presidents of Universities Professors of Mathematics Professors of Engineering & Economics Deans and Professors of Education High School Biology Teacher
Opportunity Equation “All young Americans should be educated to be “STEM-capable” no matter where they live, what educational path they pursue, or in which field they choose to work.” “The Opportunity Equation means transforming American education so that our schools provide a high quality mathematics and science education to every student.”
Opportunity Equation “Excellent mathematics and science learning for all American students will be possible only if we ‘do school differently’ in ways that place math and science more squarely at the center of the education enterprise.” “The United States will need to give at least equal weight to driving fundamental change to the nation’s schools and to strengthening the innovation capacity of the education system.”
Opportunity Equation: 4 Priority Areas “Higher levels of mathematics and science learning for all American students.” “Common standards in math and science that are fewer, clearer, and higher, coupled with aligned assessments.” “Improved teaching and professional learning, supported by better school and system management.” “New designs for schools and systems to deliver math and science learning more effectively.”
Opportunity Equation: Mobilization Plan “The Commission urges national mobilization to raise awareness and galvanize the nation for change.” “Through strategic partnerships, … organizations are taking action and encouraging broad participation.” “Resources to inform and strengthen this work, along with tools for planning, tracking, and aligning efforts around the country are available on line at www.OpportunityEquation.org “
Opportunity Equation: Implications Take 1 minute to discuss with a shoulder partner what you think are implications for your work from this report.
Update on Latest: National Reports June 2009: The Opportunity Equation July 2009: Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow Innovation in Pittsburgh’s Workforce October 2009: Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making (NCTM) October 2009: NAEP Mathematics Scores
Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow (July 2009) Executive Office of the President, Council of Economic Advisors Presents: Projection of potential developments in US labor market over next 5-10 years. Skills likely to be most relevant in growing occupations Characteristics of a more effective education and training structure. How many familiar with it?
Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow: Projections “Healthcare is forecasted to remain a large source of job growth in the labor market.” “Decades- long decline in the share of workers that are employed in manufacturing is expected to moderate.” “The construction industry is projected to eventually recover and add jobs in the coming decade.”
Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow (Education Needed) “Well trained and highly skilled workers will be best positioned to secure high wage jobs.” “Occupations requiring higher educational attainment are expected to grow much faster than those with lower… with the fastest growth among occupations that require an associate’s degree or post-secondary vocational award.”
Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow (Attributes Needed) “Employers value workers who can think critically and solve problems.” “Worker flexibility is key given the dynamic nature of the US labor market and ongoing technological change.” 2003: 25% workers jobs weren’t listed in Census Bureau’s Occupational Codes in 1967 Environmental occupations did not exist prior to 2000 Better prepared for on-going change if workers have strong analytical and interpersonal skills
Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow : Implications Take 2 minutes to discuss with a shoulder partner what you think are implications for your work from this report. http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/cea/Jobs-of-the-Future/
Update on Latest: National Reports June 2009: The Opportunity Equation July 2009: Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow Innovation in Pittsburgh’s Workforce October 2009: NAEP Mathematics Scores October 2009: Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making (NCTM)
Update on Latest: Local innovation Carnegie Science Center Excellence Awards 17 award categories each year Announce the awards in January. Awards celebration in May. Amazing videos made about the awardees. Share 10 clips to show innovation in southwest Pennsylvania showing the powerful intersection of mathematics and science.
Implications of Pittsburgh Workforce Innovation Take 2 minutes to discuss with a shoulder partner what you think are implications for your work from these examples of innovation underway in our region.
Update on Latest: Local innovation Carnegie Science Center Excellence Awards Consider nominating educators for award categories using the nomination form included in MSC Journal on pp. 78-79. Today (November 5th) is the deadline. Announce the awards in January. Plan to attend the Awards celebration in May to learn more about the latest innovation in our region.
Update on Latest: National Reports June 2009: The Opportunity Equation July 2009: Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow Innovation in Pittsburgh’s Workforce October 2009: NAEP Mathematics Scores October 2009: Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making (NCTM)
NAEP (October2009) National Assessment for Educational Progress 330,000 4th and 8th graders from all 50 states Every two years: this was given in spring of 2009 Major findings:http://nationsreportcard.gov. Progress continues at 8th grade. 4th grade did not show progress (1st time!). Racial gaps did not change. PA did not show gains. “NAEP The Basics” by Charlie Wayne (PDE) in PPG Room –(8 to 9 AM– now!)-- Session #12.
Update on Latest: National Reports June 2009: The Opportunity Equation July 2009: Preparing the Workers of Today for the Workforce of Tomorrow Innovation in Pittsburgh’s Workforce October 2009: NAEP Mathematics Scores October 2009: Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making (NCTM)
Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making (October2009) National Council of Teachers of Mathematics "A high school mathematics curriculum based on reasoning and sense making will prepare students for higher learning, career success, and productive citizenship.“ “A conceptual framework to guide the development of future publications and tools related to 9–12 mathematics curriculum and instruction.”
Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning “Reasoning involves drawing conclusions on the basis of evidence or assumptions.” “In addition to formal reasoning or proof, reasoning in mathematics often begins with explorations, conjectures, or false starts.” “As students progress through the high school years, they should develop increasingly sophisticated standards for explanations.”
Focus in High School Mathematics: Sense Making “Sense making involves developing an understanding of a situation, context, or concept by connecting it with existing knowledge.”
Reasoning and Sense Making: “… are closely intertwined and interdependent.” “… are the foundations for the processes of mathematics—problem solving, reasoning and proof, connections, communication, and representation (see NCTM [2000]). “ “… help students develop connections between new learning and their existing knowledge, increasing their likelihood of understanding and retaining the new information.”
Reasoning and Sense Making: “… should be a part of the mathematics classroom every day.” “… not as a set of new topics to be taught but as an integral part of the curriculum.” “Teachers must judiciously select tasks that require students to figure things out for themselves and ask probing questions.” “Both teachers and students should ask and answer such questions as ‘What’s going on here?” and “Why do you think that?’”
Reasoning and Sense Making: “… should be a part of the mathematics classroom every day as they include: ” …not only knowing how to carry out procedures, but alsounderstanding: why they work how they might be used how their results should be interpreted the ability to formulate, represent, and solve mathematical problems the capacity for logical thought and explanation.
Reasoning and Sense Making: “… are integral to the experiences of all students across the high school mathematics curriculum.” “…when infused everywhere in the curriculum, they allow students to discover coherence across the domains of mathematics and help them see how new concepts connect with existing knowledge.” “Developing strong reasoning habits may yield compensating efficiencies. reducing need for repetition and re-teaching streamlining the curriculum.”
Reasoning and Sense Making: “… must be evident in the mathematical experiences of all students.” “…high schools can monitor equity by attending to the opportunities for engaging every student in the activities of reasoning and sense making. Courses (all must include emphasis) Students demographics (enrollment) Expectations, beliefs and biases of staff
Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making “Curriculum, instruction, and assessment form a coherent whole to support reasoning and sense making.” “Too often, as students progress, they fall victim to differing mathematical expectations.“ “… build strong partnerships and recognize the benefits of a mathematics curriculum that focuses on reasoning and sense making from prekindergarten through grade 16.”
Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making “Curriculum, instruction, and assessment form a coherent whole to support reasoning and sense making.” “Assessments must not counter this focus… instead, … must probe students’ development of mathematical reasoning and sense making.” “Formative assessment is key to helping teachers ensure progress in reasoning and sense making i.e. providing students with learning activities asking them to explain their thinking on the basis of feedback from those activities, adjusting teaching to meet the students’ needs.”
Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making “All stakeholders must work together to ensure that reasoning and sense making are the focus of high school mathematics programs.” “… teachers will need long-term professional development and support, including opportunities for reflection on their practice and guidance in improving it.” Students and families must understand importance to their futures. Policymakers must secure resources.
Reasoning and Sense Making Report: Impact on Your Work Take 2 minutes to discuss with a shoulder partner what you think are implications for your work from this report. http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=23749 ] There are many sessions in this conference supporting this approach. To mobilize others, consider attending Session # 38 “Engaging High School Parents as Partners.
State Initiatives: SAS PA’s Standards Aligned System (SAS) New SAS Roll-out at 21st Century Teaching and Learning Institute December 7-10, 2009 at Hershey Lodge Will reveal the new Interactive Website Sessions here on contents of SAS Science: #31- ticketed session in Maple Room Mathematics #30 – ticketed session in Ohio Room #59 - 12 to 1:30PM in PPG Room
Morning Today PCTM Program is your guide Notes presenters and room location of sessions Map on back 20 other sessions began at 8 AM From 9:15 to noon: A-J Ticketed sessions– #29- #38 (p.25-28) Typical 3 hour Network Connections sessions Space still available in most, go to location and you will be admitted if there is room. Additional 15 shorter sessions
Lunch and Resource Fair Resource Fair is available from 8 AM to 5 PM. • In Ballrooms A and B and in hallway • List of organizations on page 63 • Commercial vendors in addition to non-profits! 6 Additional Sessions featured from 12 to 1 PM. Lunch is available for purchase in hotel restaurants and from sandwich carts.
Afternoon Today • Keynote – Eric Jolly -- 1 to 2 PM (here) • President, Science Museum of Minnesota • Article in the Journal, “Trilogy for Student Success” • Interact will begin at 2 PM in Junior Ballroom • Team Folders will be on team tables including: • Interact forms • Signature sheets and data confirmation • Parent Handbook order forms • Turn in to Coordinator before leaving to receive Parent High School Handbook (1 per district)
Feedback for Future • Evaluation • Complete Front & Overview (now!) • Enter session # for rest of morning so feedback can be related to appropriate session. • Make notes for reporting to your team. • Provide feedback to us – turn in before leaving! • Network Connections will return to the Carnegie Science Center in February. RSVP is in Journal. • Math & Science Collaborative Journal • Extra copies available at registration desk • Questions?
IHE Faculty IU IU K-12 Teachers Southwest PennsylvaniaNetwork Connections ACHIEVING STUDENTS