290 likes | 555 Views
May 14, 2012. 3. Agenda. Cable and connector testing for logoMini-B connector testing for design validation. May 14, 2012. 4. Cable and Connector Testing. Cable and Connector Testing - Why ?Communications LossInterop ProblemsOrlando 1999 - CCDWGTest Laboratory SelectionSpecification ReviewPr
E N D
2. May 14, 2012 2 USB 2.0 Cable and Connector Testing George G. Olear IIContech Research, Inc.
Sheldon SingletonNational Technical Systems
3. May 14, 2012 3 Agenda Cable and connector testing for logo
Mini-B connector testing for design validation
4. May 14, 2012 4 Cable and Connector Testing Cable and Connector Testing - Why ?
Communications Loss
Interop Problems
Orlando 1999 - CCDWG
Test Laboratory Selection
Specification Review
Product Delisting
Group 6 Testing as a Starter
Provisional Listing
5. May 14, 2012 5 Cable and Connector Testing Benefits of Compliance Testing
The use of listed cables and connectors is required for devices to get on the Integrators List
You must be listed in order to use the new logo which indicates that the cable is high speed capable.
6. May 14, 2012 6 Cable and Connector Testing
7. May 14, 2012 7 Cable and Connector Testing Successes and Failures
Vibration and Shock
Attenuation
Cable Impedance
Shielding Effectiveness
8. May 14, 2012 8 Cable and Connector Testing Integrators List
Listed on Integrators List
Advanced Connectek USA
AMP/Tycoelectronics
American Power Conversion
Bizlink International Corp
Chant Sincere Co.
Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co.
Comoss ElectricCo.
Copartner Wire and Cable Mfg. Corp.
Dong Guan Shinko Wire Co.
FCI Electronics
Foxconn
I/O Systems Inc. formerly Elite Electronics, Inc.
Fujikura America Glory Mark Electronic LTd.
Golden Bridge Electech Inc.
God Way Industrial Co.
Hannstar Electronics Corp.
I/O Interconnect
JST
Ji-Haw Industrial
Joinsoon Electronics Mfg. Co., Ltd.
Lin Shiung Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Longwell Electronics
Lumberg, Inc.
Mainsuper Enterprises Co., Ltd.
Mitsumi
Molex
9. May 14, 2012 9 Cable and Connector Testing Integrators List cont.
Northstar
Pan International
Perfect Technic Enterprise Co. Ltd.
Sinbon Electronics Co.
Sunf Pu Technology Co.
TIME Interconnect Ltd.
TSAY-E (BVI) International
Tayo Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd.
Total Technologies, Ltd
Unixtar Technology Inc.
Wha Yu Industrial Co., Ltd.
Wieson Electronic Co., Ltd.
10. May 14, 2012 10 Mini-B Connector Design Validation The Mini- B Cable and Connector minimum qualification test program
The program consisted of 4 manufacturerswho agreed
1st - The Design
2nd - Submission of their first products for independent testing .
And the players are:
ACON Marunix Mitsumi Molex
11. May 14, 2012 11 Mini-B Connector Design Validation Minimum Qualification Testing Program
Group 1 Testing
Durability
Vibration and Shock
Cable pullout
Group 3 Testing
Mixed Flowing Gas
Group 6 Testing
Attenuation
Impedance
Propagation Delay/ Delay Skew
Shielding Effectiveness
12. May 14, 2012 12 Group 1 Tests Durability
Mating/Unmating Forces
Contact Resistance (LLCR)
Vibration and Mechanical Shock
Contact Chatter
Contact Resistance (LLCR)
Cable Pullout
Continuity
13. May 14, 2012 13 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results Low Level Circuit Resistance (milliohms)
14. May 14, 2012 14 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results Unmating Forces after durability testing
15. May 14, 2012 15 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results
16. May 14, 2012 16 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results Mini “B” Unmate Forces
Manual Durability
17. May 14, 2012 17 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results
18. May 14, 2012 18 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 1 Test Results Mini “B” Unmate Forces
Automatic Durability
19. May 14, 2012 19 Group 3 Tests Mixed Flowing Gas
Plating Integrity - Contacts
Contact Resistance
Plating Integrity - Shell
Contact Resistance of the Shell
Contact life
2 days exposure = 1 year field life
20. May 14, 2012 20 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 3 Test Results Low Level Circuit Resistance during MFG test
21. May 14, 2012 21 Group 6 Tests Impedance
Affected by Incorrect cable impedance, Improper cable/connector terminations, Defective connector contact plating, Incorrect connector interface dimensions
Attenuation
Affected by Cable Construction, Cable Length, Cable Capacitance, Inductance, Skin Effect and Frequency Range
Propagation Delay
Affected by Cable Construction, Cable Length, Impedanceand Termination, and Measurement System Rise Time
22. May 14, 2012 22 Group 6 Tests Propagation Delay Skew Testing
Affected by Cable Construction, Cable Length, Impedance and Termination, MeasurementSystem Rise Time, and Connector/CableAssembly Techniques
Shielding Effectiveness
Affected by Cable Braid Construction, Connector/Cable Assembly Construction
23. May 14, 2012 23 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results Impedance
1 Meter Cable Assembly Requirement (76.5 to 103.5)
Sample ID A Group B Group C Group D Group
001 88.07 84.95 88.17 91.90
002 86.90 85.68 86.60 93.16
003 86.08 85.24 85.90 90.76
004 86.02 85.73 89.39 93.85
005 85.34 85.84 88.04 92.21
006 86.03 84.76 88.71 90.53
Average 86.41 85.37 87.80 92.07
24. May 14, 2012 24 Group 6 Test Results - Attenuation
A Group B Group C Group D Group
Freq./Req. (MHz/dB)Average Average Average Average
0.064/.08 .0183 .0212 .0072 .0026
.256/.11 .0210 .2370 .0003 .0034
.512/.13 .0249 .0272 .0139 .0104
.772/.15 .0283 .0307 .0356 .0186
1/.2 .0315 .0338 .0233 .0251
4/.39 .0789 .0812 .0682 .0873
8/.57 .0815 .1059 .0853 .1060
12/.67 .1236 .1376 .1098 .1295
24/.95 .2138 .2395 .2047 .1929
48/1.35 .3915 .4290 .3900 .3278
96/1.9 .3100 .3640 .3386 .3488
200/3.2 .4709 .5259 .4909 .4952
400/5.8 .9934 1.0005 .9981 .8974
25. May 14, 2012 25 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results Issues “5 Meter Cable Attenuation Specification”
Attenuation values to be evaluated at the following frequency ranges: 4 MHz, 8 MHz, and 12 MHz
Average Results of 15 different samples:
4 MHz: Requirement (.39 dB), Results: “.3986 dB”
8 MHz: Requirement (.57 dB), Results: “.5710 dB”
12 MHz: Requirement (.67 dB), Results: “.7740 dB”
26. May 14, 2012 26 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results Propagation Delay
1 Meter Cable Assembly Requirement (5.2 ns max)
Sample ID
A Group B Group C Group D Group
001 5.02 5.12 4.92 4.92
002 5.02 5.02 4.92 4.92
003 5.32 5.02 4.82 4.92
004 5.02 5.12 4.92 4.82
005 5.12 5.12 4.92 4.92
006 5.02 5.02 4.92 4.92
Average 5.09 5.07 4.90 4.90
27. May 14, 2012 27 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results Propagation Delay Skew
1 Meter Cable Assembly Requirement (100 ps max)
Sample ID
Group A Group B Group C Group D
001 8.83 33.91 25.25 49.64
002 25.47 38.7 1.6 35.27
003 31.72 41.83 2.3 7.83
004 41.09 11.39 3.1 40.76
005 6.06 32.47 19.42 86.76
006 34.12 24.43 0.21 0.65
Average 24.55 30.46 8.65 36.81
28. May 14, 2012 28 Cable and Connector TestingGroup 6 Test Results Sheilding Effectiveness
Issues: Sheilding Effectiveness values to be evaluated at various frequencies and various lengths.
Average results of various samples tested (Requirement:20 dB minimum)
1 Meter: 24 samples; Worst case frequency: 15.5dB @ 800 MHz
2 Meter: 5 samples; Worst case frequency: 16.5 dB @ 200 MHz
5 Meter: 5 samples; Worst case frequency: 19.44 dB @ 1 GHz
29. May 14, 2012 29 Cable and Connector Testing Where Are We Going From Here?
Cable and Connector Certification
Completion of the Mini-B Testing
Mini-B Connector ECN
Cable and Connector Class Document 1.0