210 likes | 339 Views
IndII Board Meeting. Agenda and Presentations. Agenda and Presentations. 25 November 2009. Agenda. Technical Team Report. Summary points from last Board Meeting (May 26 th ). General improvement in management noted
E N D
IndII Board Meeting Agenda and Presentations Agenda and Presentations 25 November 2009
Summary points from last Board Meeting (May 26th) • General improvement in management noted • Acknowledged more rapid development of new activities, but spend is still too low. Further acceleration is required • Approved new and more streamlined activity review process • Acknowledged better and more open working relationship between Technical Team and IndII • More frequent TT meetings /communications • Too focussed on national level activities, more required at the sub-national level.
Review of Progress • Strong progress reflected in 2 ways: • Rapid development of new activities • Sharp increase in TT approved budgets and actual spend • ‘Progressive engagement’ – focus now on small scoping activities leading to larger, better designed programs for next work-plan period • Development and enhancement of institutional relationships
Activity Development • Sharp increase in TT and AusAID commitments since April • As of end January • TT commitments: $A 18.2 million • AusAID approvals: $ A 15.0 million • Average monthly expenditure: • Feb to Aug 2009: $142,300 • Sept 2009 to Jan 2010: $835,700
Activity Development ...cont’d • Spending low on a burn rate basis • Rapid growth in recent months • Opportunities for large increases in spending in coming work-plan periods • ‘Progressive engagement’
Activity Development...cont’d • ‘Progressive engagement’ • IndII has pursued many small scoping (stage 1) activities using external experts. • Use of more specialised skills/expertise allows better designed/planned follow-on activities • Allows more opportunities for counterpart input, ensures program is demand driven • Management flexibility. Stage 1 ‘stop/go’ point • Lays the foundation for larger activities • Table 2: A$ 3 mill in current stage 1 activities potentially leads to $A 11-26 million in follow on activities
Institutional Relationships • Most notable is DGHS (Cipta Karya) • Key partner in 20 PDAM , WSI (Hibah, PAMSIMAS, Banjarmasin sewerage, Wastewater masterplans), Umbullan Springs, amongst others • Also strong relationship developing with DGH (Bina Marga) • New activities in MTEF & Performance Budgeting, Procurement, Audit • Commitment to develop Road safety unit with IndII’s assistance
Institutional Relationships..cont’d • Relationship with DGPT continues to strengthen • IndII Project manager embedded • New requests to assist with Telcom law • New programs assisting weaker agencies • Rail and port national masterplans • Key facilitation role played by the TT • New programs to assist weak local governments (Papua, W.Papua, NTT, NTB)
Recommendations for Board • Endorse forward strategy and workplan • Endorse changes in facility structure • Continued development and streamlining of systems and procedures • Redefinition of IEG to include TA for project preparation (IPM activities) • Focus IEG grants on wastewater and solid waste