1 / 13

Assessing the Ineffable

Assessing the Ineffable. How can we measure what we truly value in a liberal education?. Literary Study, Measurement, and the Sublime Donna Heiland and Laura Rosenthal Eds . The Teagle Foundation 2011. Summary and Thinking Points. The Ineffability Debate.

mabli
Download Presentation

Assessing the Ineffable

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessing the Ineffable How can we measure what we truly value in a liberal education?

  2. Literary Study, Measurement, and the SublimeDonna Heiland and Laura Rosenthal Eds.The Teagle Foundation 2011 Summary and Thinking Points

  3. The Ineffability Debate • What we truly value about a liberal education, especially in arts and humanities fields like literary studies are so-called “ineffable” qualities • Learning outcome assessments do not and cannot capture these ineffable qualities • Assessment threatens to reduce learning within the humanities to solely “peripheral” and “instrumental” qualities

  4. What are “ineffable” learning outcomes? • Those “Ah-ha!” moments that signify intense, passionate engagement with and understanding of a subject leading to original creative insights and a love of learning

  5. Learning Outcomes • Basic reading/writing/ communication skills • Knowledge of key terms and concepts • Research and citation of secondary sources • Ability to construct and support an argument • *Critical thinking • Love of learning • Passionate engagement with course content • Analytical “shrewdness” • Creative cognitive insight • Shaping of character and intellectual habits Instrumental Ineffable

  6. But is the Ineffable… …truly un-measurable?

  7. Rethinking Assumptions Creating an Ineffable Assessment Plan

  8. Philosophy • Bring the tools and language within a discipline to bear on the assessment process • Ex. Theories of the sublime 1 • Attempt to understand what happens in moments of intense engagement between subject and object • The conditions under which such moments occur • What the subject and object look like before and after sublime experiences • Acknowledge that sublime experiences cannot be fully captured but are worth pursuing • We assess the ineffable elsewhere, so why not in learning?

  9. (In)Direct Assessment Measures • Level of student enthusiasm/engagement • Engagement in “high impact” activities2 • Reading Practices • Thesis->antithesis->synthesis • Affective reading experience • Measure growth of students’ “need for cognition” using the NSSE’s “deep learning” scale and Wabash National Study of Liberal Education Survey • Survey questions: “Have you ever been so absorbed in a book/poem/discussion that you lost track of time?”3

  10. Needs: Discipline-Oriented Assessment • Assessment in the language and terms of the discipline • Greater faculty support • Shape to curricular practices

  11. Needs: Clearer Articulation of Ineffable Learning Goals (!) • The value and terms of so-called “instrumental/peripheral” outcomes are easier to articulate, to explain, and to assess • Ineffable outcomes have been relegated to “catch-all” and abstract categories like: • Critical/creative thinking—e-portfolios • Broadening of worldview • Rubrics—Not Just for Assignments4 • Build in flexibility • Collaborative, dialogic, and evolving

  12. Value of Ineffable Learning • Learning to think outside the “inbox” • Understand the power that comes from the skillful use of words and images • Makes “working”—engaging processes of analysis, understanding, and creation—enjoyable, encouraging students to think broadly and innovatively, helping them achieve work positions they will find more fulfilling • Engages an affective experience that is also another dimension of learning; not just a means to an end but an end in itself

  13. Sources • The concept of the sublime is used as an organizing principle throughout the reader, but the particular breakdown of the concept used here comes from: “Approaching the Ineffable: Flow, Sublimity, and Student Learning” by Donna Heiland • Rachelle L. Brooks discusses George D. Kuh’s concept of “high impact” educational practices in: “Making the Case for Discipline-Based Assessment” • Heiland, “Approaching” with discussion of Thomas F. Nelson Laird, George D. Kuh, and Rick Shoup’s “Measuring Deep Approaches to Learning Using the National Survey of Student Engagement” • For further discussion of assessment and rubrics see: “Fearful Symmetries: Rubrics And Assessment” by Sarah Webster Goodwin

More Related