1 / 24

Putting Surveillance into Action: A Case Study of Syphilis

Putting Surveillance into Action: A Case Study of Syphilis. Jonathan Ellen, MD Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. FR. FR. FR. OP. OP. Organization of Syphilis in STD*MIS. Standard syphilis data in health department MIS can be organized into “lots” Original patient interview

mabli
Download Presentation

Putting Surveillance into Action: A Case Study of Syphilis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Putting Surveillance into Action:A Case Study of Syphilis Jonathan Ellen, MD Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

  2. FR FR FR OP OP Organization of Syphilis in STD*MIS • Standard syphilis data in health department MIS can be organized into “lots” • Original patient interview • Demographic including age, race/ethnicity, address of residence • Field records • Demographics and locating information of OP contacts • Infected contacts receive same interview as OP Marginal Partners

  3. Limitations of Syphilis Data • Information about meeting locations of “lots” and connections between “lots” not entered into MIS • Important information lost which could be used to guide enhanced activities • Links across time • Links across DIS assignments • Links to locations • Lost information can be easily captured or imputed (“computerized chalk-talk”)

  4. Changes in Syphilis Epidemiology • As rates decline, syphilis becoming more concentrated in individuals with high centrality • People who trade sex for drugs or money • Men with multiple male sex partners • These populations are harder to reach

  5. Computerized “Chalk Talk” • Use existing MIS data to find key hard-to-reach populations • Map meeting places to identify geographic location of lots, i.e., “hotspots” • Using matching programs to impute connections between lots, i.e., link networks

  6. Hot Spots • Social networks defined by risky behaviors: • sex exchange • drug abuse/drug selling • MSM • Risky behaviors tend to occur in identifiable geographic areas • People go outside their neighborhoods to meet sex partners in these risky areas

  7. Hotspot Evidence from Baltimore • Among syphilis cases 2001-2002: • Only 9% met partner within same Census Block Group as their residence • Only 37% met partner within same Census Tract as their residence • Density of cases • Residences more geographically dispersed • Meeting venues more geographically concentrated

  8. Name List 1 IR and FR John A. Bruce B. Joanne C. David D. Edith E. Name List 2 Enhanced Data and Jail Data Phillip W. Tyler X. Debbie Y. JoAnn C. Frank Z. Name Matching Algorithm MATCHING Algorithm *names are invented

  9. Connecting Networks

  10. Connecting Networks

  11. Example

  12. Baltimore Data Sources • Syphilis Interview Records • Syphilis Field Records • Syphilis Elimination Enhanced Interview data • Sex partner meeting venues • Contacts met at each meeting venue

  13. Results of Patterson Park Name Matching • 2 females linked cases through time • Both passed through corrections

  14. Places Associated with Matched Names

  15. Male 2 Female A Male 1

  16. Timeline – Female A March 2002 Contact – Male 1 April 2002 Corrections Case-RX August 2002 Contact – Male 2 November 2003Corrections Case-RX Reinfected

  17. Challenges • Dependent on collection of some/any identifying information • Marginal partners not entered into STD*MIS • Dependent on information about meeting places • Meeting place data not entered into STD*MIS • Dependent on real time analysis and linkages with corrections

  18. Implications • Include meeting places and marginal partner in health department MIS • Refine matching methods • Increase GIS capacity • Integrate matching and GIS into routine surveillance • Link findings to field activity • Frequent surveillance updates • Make computerized “chalk data” information real time • Develop strategies for disrupting transmission at hot spots • Eliminate entirely • Make structural changes which impede transmission

More Related