1 / 15

NPT or CTR? Gains and Losses for Stockpile Security

NPT or CTR? Gains and Losses for Stockpile Security. Lars van Dassen, SKI Morten Bremer Märli, NUPI. Three Objectives:. I: Highlight differences and similarities between the NPT and CTR II: Address inter-operability III: Recommendations. What is the NPT ?. Art III. Art VI. Art I.

macha
Download Presentation

NPT or CTR? Gains and Losses for Stockpile Security

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NPT or CTR?Gains and Losses for Stockpile Security Lars van Dassen, SKI Morten Bremer Märli, NUPI

  2. Three Objectives: • I: Highlight differences and similarities between the NPT and CTR • II: Address inter-operability • III: Recommendations

  3. What is the NPT ? Art III Art VI Art I Art II Art II + IV Art II

  4. What is CTR ? Cooperative Threat Reduction: Activities to implement nuclear weapons disarmament (dismantlement) and security of materials; primarily in Russia and the FSU; initiated by the USA and adhered to by an increasing number of states both (donors and recipients) for instance in the framework of the G-8 DGP

  5. A NPT/CTR relationship ? CTR NPT

  6. ARRANGEMENT: Treaty, institutions, (sg) agreements PARTIES: States RELATION: Equal with subdivision into NNWS and NWS etc. ARRANGEMENT: Bilateral agreements with institutional coating G-8 DGP PARTIES: States RELATION: donor-recipient Differences and similarities (1)NPT CTR

  7. ACTORS: States and authorities MEANS: Diplomacy, reciprocity TIME FRAME: Permanent ACTORS: States, authorities, facilities and NGOs MEANS: Diplomacy, funding, negotiations, contracts TIME FRAME: plus/minus 2012 Differences and similarities (2)NPT CTR

  8. FOCUS: Disarmament/non-proliferation relation, nuclear materials and activities under sg. OUTREACH: Global FOCUS: Disarmament treaties, nuclear security, security of radioactive materials etc. OUTREACH: Regional Differences and similarities (3)NPT CTR

  9. DOES FOR STOCKPILE SECURITY: Nothing in NWS, a lot in NNWS (accounting, activities and motivation check) DOES FOR STOCKPILE SECURITY: Quite a lot in NWS (nws) and NNWS - that are assistance recipients (mainly physical protection) Differences and similarities (4)NPT CTR

  10. Inter-operability of the NPT and CTR ? (1) Approximate quotes: “We need CTR as a cure for all problems and countries” (Henry Hyde) “Instead of the ‘avalanche of acronyms’ of the NPT system we need sound practical measures to stop proliferation”. (John Wolf)

  11. Inter-operability of the NPT and CTR ? (2) While the NPT and CTR are different - the mentioned quotes overlook how the NPT and CTR can be used as reciprocally supporting - though also complicating - tools…….

  12. Inter-operability of the NPT and CTR ? (3) What can the NPT do for CTR? • Provide a moral backbone for non-proliferation and disarmament measures that is otherwise absent • Reduce arms twisting • Broaden the scope of CTR to include materials accounting issues and states non-proliferation motivation

  13. Inter-operability of the NPT and CTR ? (4) What can CTR do for/to the NPT? • Provide informal and quick handling of proliferation risks • Offer a sensitive and case-adapted entry to the non-proliferation regime • Obfuscate non-proliferation nomenclature • Turn attention away from NPT obligations, particularly Art VI

  14. Recommendations • Refer to the NPT when you do CTR • Beware of the CTR nomenclature • Use CTR to strengthen adherence to NPT obligations and objectives • Make sure CTR investments are not undermined by irresponsibility in nuclear weapons development / absence of disarmament

  15. Thank you for taking a look at this issue

More Related