1 / 52

Born-Oppenheimer Coupling Terms as Molecular Fields

Born-Oppenheimer Coupling Terms as Molecular Fields. Michael Baer The Fritz Haber Research Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. Longstanding Collaborations Prof. G.D. Billing (deceased) Prof. A. Vibok (Debrecen, Hungary)

maciel
Download Presentation

Born-Oppenheimer Coupling Terms as Molecular Fields

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Born-OppenheimerCoupling TermsasMolecular Fields Michael Baer The Fritz Haber Research Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

  2. Longstanding Collaborations Prof. G.D. Billing (deceased) Prof. A. Vibok (Debrecen, Hungary) Prof. G.J. Halasz (Debrecen, Hungary) Prof. R. Englman (Soreq, Israel) Prof. A.M. Mebel (Intl. Univ. Miami, Fl USA) Prof. S. Adhikari (ITT, Guwahati, India) Mr. B. Sarkar, (ITT, Guwahati, India) Dr. T. Vertesi (Debrecen, Hungary) Prof, D.J. Kouri, (Houston, TX, USA) Prof. D.K. Hoffman (Ames, IA, USA) Prof. R. Baer (Jerusalem, Israel) Short Collaborations Prof. A. Alijah (Coimbra, Portugal) Dr. E. Bene (Debrecen, Hungary) Dr. A. Yahalom (Ariel, Israel) Dr. S. Hu (Houston, TX, USA) Prof. A.J.C. Varandas (Coimbra, Portugal) Dr. Z.R. Xu (Coimbra, Portugal) Dr. D. Charutz (Soreq, Israel) Prof. R. Kosloff (Jerusalem, Israel) Prof. J. Avery (Copenhagen, Denmark) Prof. S.H. Lin (IAMS, Taipei, Taiwan) Colleagues – Past & Present

  3. Introduction The Non-adiabatic Coupling Term as a Physical Entity

  4. The Non-adiabatic Coupling Term(NACT)

  5. Four Coupled Potential Surfaces Halasz, Vibok, Baer Chem. Phys. Lett. 413, 226 (2005)

  6. What is the Purpose of this Lecture? • To understand the physical contents of the NACTs • By Definition a NACT is a vector but….? • We show that NACTs behave like fields

  7. Contents • I. The Hilbert Space • II. Degeneracy Points as Poles • III. Vector Algebra to Form Two-state (Quantum) fields • IV. Field Equations to Form Multi-State (Quantum) Fields

  8. Chapter I The Hilbert Space

  9. Introduction • Consider a series of N-dimensional Hilbert spaces • Resolution of unity:

  10. The NACT • The connection between the Hilbert spaces of adjacent points is described in terms of an NxN vectorial matrix: •  is the electronic Born Oppenheimer NACT matrix •  is an anti-symmetric matrix

  11. Connecting Hilbert Spaces • Two Hilbert spaces at nearby points: • Recalling the resolution of the unity (and multiplying by )

  12. We obtain: • Solving the First order Differential • The Integration is along a prescribed contour R. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 405 (2002).

  13. sf si Closed Contour • For a closed contour (loop) • In loops: return to the same state (up to phase) A. Alijah and M. Baer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 319, 489 (2000)

  14. Quantization Conditions • A group of N states forms a Hilbert space(in a given region) if and only if the D-matrices are diagonal along any contour :

  15. Quantization Conditions • In the case of real eigenfunctions: • In case of two states (N=2): the D-matrix can be written as: A. Alijah and M. Baer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 319,489(2000)

  16. Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization Condition • () is the Topological (Berry) phase: • The 22D()-matrix becomes diagonal if:

  17. Hilbert subspace • We assume that  breaks up into blocks

  18. How to detect NACTs? Halasz, Vibok, Baer, CPL 413,226(2005)

  19. NH2: 2-state results Vibok, Halasz, Suhai,Hoffman, Kouri, Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 024312 (2006)

  20. NH2: 3-state resultsVibok, Halasz, Suhai,Hoffman, Kouri, Baer,JCP 124, 024312 (2006)

  21. H+H2 3-statesHalasz, Vibok, Mebel, BaerJCP 118, 3052 (2003)

  22. The Curl Equation • The eigenfunctions of a Hilbert space satisfy, for any (p,q) tensorial component, the equality: • This equality is termed as the Curl Condition • If the NACT-matrix breaks up into blocks the Curl Conditionis fulfilled for each Block M. Baer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 35, 112 (1975)

  23. The Curl Equation (continued) • Abelianvs non-Abelian variables • Commutation Relation • The t-matrix is, in general, non-Abelian • A 22t-matrix is Abelian

  24. j q CI The curl condition for Two-state System: • Here: • This case is Abelian and therefore: • In polar coordinates

  25. j q CI The Divergence Equation • The eigenfunctions of a Hilbert space form also a Divergence equation • where • In polar coordinates:

  26. Div(s) for a Two-State System • In Cartesian Coordinates • The t(2) matrix elements are: • In contrast to t-matrix elements, they are scalars

  27. Chapter II Degeneracy Points As Poles

  28. The Degeneracy Point and its Close Vicinity • At the vicinity of DP the corresponding NACT behaves like a Pole: it is singular and decays like (1/q) • At the vicinity of DP the corresponding NACT possesses an angular component. • At the vicinity of DP the radial component of the corresponding NACT is negligible small. • At the vicinity of DP related to a given NACT the effect of all other NACTs is negligible small

  29. The Epstein Theorem • The Epstein Theorem States that (at every point in CS): • Degeneracy Points (DP) can only be formed if

  30. j q CI The Epstein Theorem at Degeneracy Points • At the vicinity of aDPwe consider the angular component: • At the vicinity of a DPwe expand for q~0

  31. The Pole and the Quantization • For the DP to be a Pole: • In such a case: • Recalling Quantization (Berry Phase):

  32. j q CI S Stokes Theorem • The (Abelian) 22 Curl Condition: • There is an unresolved issue at q=0: We have to define F at q=0to fulfill Stokes Theorem. • Stokes theorem Asserts that: M. Maer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 349,149 (2001) Vertesi, Vibok, Halasz, Yahalom, Englman and Baer, J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 7189 (2003)

  33. Stokes Theorem (Cont.) • The line integral Fulfills Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization law • F has to be extended to have a value at the DP point: • To fulfill the Stokes Theorem must obey

  34. Close vicinity of DP(Example: solving the Curl Equation) • Having the Curl equation • We derive the angular component of : • Thus near a DP(q0): Will be taken as boundary values around each DP

  35. The Angular NACT for H+H2

  36. Summary(what did we achieve so far?) • The Curl-Div Equations fulfilled by the NACTs can be applied to derive the related fields (just like the Maxwell Equations are applied to calculate the electro-magnetic fields) • The boundary conditions needed to calculate these fields are formed at the close vicinity of the DPs and are obtained from Ab-initio calculations using given packages (MOLPRO).

  37. Chapter III Vector Algebra to Form Two-State Quantum Fields

  38. Vector Algebra for Abelian Systems • Expression for a single ci as seen from a given origin • Where:

  39. For Several DPs • The NACT field formed at N DPs: J. Avery, M. Baer and G.D. Billing, Molec. Phys. 100, 1011 (2002)

  40. NaH2: AbelianNACTs at Four DP A. Vibok, T. Vertesi, E. Bene, G.J. Halasz and M. Baer, J. Phys. Chem. A. 108,8590 (2004)

  41. Ab-initio vs. VectorAlgebra (NaH2) as calculated alongfour different contours • Vibok, T. Vertesi, E. Bene, G.J. Halasz • and M. Baer, J. Phys. Chem. A. 108,8590 (2004) Vibok, Vertesi,Bene,Halasz, Baer, J. Phys. Chem. A108, 8590 (2004)

  42. Chapter IV Field Equations to Form Multi-State Quantum Fields

  43. Field Theory to derive NACTs • The Born-Oppenheimer NACTs are: • Vector-fields formed by sources located atDPs. • Treated theoretically (and numerically) employing field theory. • Methodology: • Calculate Abelian NACTs, jj+1 formed, by states j and j+1, due to a single DP along a small contour surrounding this (j,j+1) DP (e.g. MOLPRO). • At larger regions, due to the existence of DPs formed by other states, the system becomes non-Abelian • The NN -matrix which fulfills the non-Abelian Curl-Equation and the non-Abelian Div-Equation is obtained by solving these equations. • This calculated matrix contains the non-Abelian Quantum Fields.

  44. The Curl Equation for a 3-state System M. Baer, A. M. Mebel and G.D. Billing, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 90, 1577 (2002)

  45. A 3-state system (Ab-initio evidence for the Curl Eq.): • Example: Forming Curl 13 in two different ways: • By differentiation of 13 • By forming the vector product Vertesi, Vibok, Halasz, Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 8420 (2004)

  46. The Div-Equation for a 3-state System Vertesi,Vibok, Halasz, M. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 121,4000 (2004)

  47. The Poisson Equations • Curl-Div Equations for each one of the NACTs: • Decoupling of the two components Vertesi, Vibok, Halasz, Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 121,4000 (2004)

  48. Molecular Fields for the H+H2 System

More Related