1 / 33

Academics Forum

American Society of Safety Engineers. Academics Forum. June 15, 2010. Assessment of Student Learning Experiences in Two Different Modes of Course Delivery. By:. Hamid Fonooni, Michael Behm, & David Batts MS, Occupational Safety Program Department of Technology Systems

mackensie-acosta
Download Presentation

Academics Forum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. American Society of Safety Engineers Academics Forum June 15, 2010 Assessment of Student Learning Experiences in Two Different Modes of Course Delivery By: Hamid Fonooni, Michael Behm, & David Batts MS, Occupational Safety Program Department of Technology Systems East Carolina University Greenville, North Carolina

  2. East Carolina University Some Demographics • ECU is a part of UNC System with approximately 27,000 students and accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) • ECU consists of ten (10) Colleges, plus School of Medicine and a brand new School of Dental Medicine • ECU is the lead school in online course delivery among all UNC System campuses • MS, Occupational Safety (MSOS) program is a graduate program and is housed in the Department of Technology Systems with an average of 35 students (~80% online and 20% on-campus). MSOS has been predominantly an on-line program since early ‘90s. • Two full time faculty and three part-time or adjunct faculty

  3. MSOS Program Curriculum and Course Delivery Methods • 36-39 credit hours with two tracks: Thesis Track (39 cr. hrs) and Practicum Track (36 cr. hrs.). • Learning objectives for online and on-campus students are identical. Experiential learning through projects is the prevalent teaching technique. • The two course delivery methods are through Centra (online conference) and Global Classroom (streaming video) • MS, Occupational Safety (MSOS) program needs to reach both online and on-campus students in the most effective way. • Two full time faculty and three part-time or adjunct faculty teach the curriculum. • Since 2006, the on-line track exclusively is available to working professionals in the SHE profession or closely related fields. • MSOS is preparing to seek ABET Accreditation in 2012-2013.

  4. Purpose of This Study • This presentation will discuss two modes of delivery of courses in the MS Occupational Safety (MSOS) Program. • Students are surveyed to assess their learning experiences using two methods of delivery: • “Global Classroom”, streaming video; • “Centra”, online conference

  5. Global Classroom Purpose • The Global Classroom is a state-of-the-art teaching and learning center which supports internet-based video conferencing and other collaboration tools for groups up to 100 persons. • The Global Classroom is designed to host asynchronous and synchronous online activities.

  6. Global Classroom Purpose • Global classroom will capture both the video and voice of the instructor, as well as the computer screen of the computer. The instructor can choose to display both the video of the instructor and the computer screen, or switch among them. • Distance education students also need to be aware that they can ask questions during a live streaming class as well as e-mail the instructors with questions after the web cast is archive • Students can login to the Mediasite server for the courses they are registered and use Mediasite player to view the archived video. Lectures of the entire semester will be made assessable to students during the semester.

  7. Centra Purpose • A web conferencing program which enables a group of people to interact with one another in a virtual online meeting environment. • Centra can be accessed "live" anytime from anywhere attendees have access to a computer and an Internet connection. • All meetings using Centra are automatically recorded, so those unable to make the live meeting are able to playback the meeting at a later time.

  8. Centra Screen

  9. Purpose of This Study • Assessment of Student Learning Experiences in Two Different Modes of Course Delivery: • “Global Classroom”, streaming video; • “Centra”, online conference

  10. Methodology • An anonymous survey in two parts was conducted. • Part A: the over all expectationsof students from an on-line delivery course was assessed. • Part B: students’ direct experience with each method of delivery was assessed. • IRB approval was obtained. • The survey was delivered to the MSOS program students, including current students and graduates within past three years. • 35 completed responses were received (61%).

  11. Methodology (Continued) • For this study, four attributes for an on-line course delivery method were defined as: • Technology • Environment • Communication • Quality of Learned/Acquired Knowledge • In Part A, students were asked to rank 7 features in each category, based on their importance, personal expectations and preference. • In Part B, using the same features in each category, students were asked to rate (1-5) their experience using Centra and Global Classroom.

  12. SURVEY

  13. Results Incomplete or erroneous responses were excluded. 35 completed response were analyzed (61% Response rate).

  14. Results for Part 1

  15. Results for Part 2

  16. Suitable for communication (e.g., clear real time two way communication, video capability) 5 Participation (e.g., communicate with class live, instant response, interactive dialogue) 7 Archiving system (e.g., easy access to archived materials, always available, up-to date) 2 Availability (e.g., archived materials, archived lectures, structured scheduling) 6 Compatibility (e.g., system compatibility, Mac or any types of MS Windows) 1 3 Accessibility (e.g., internet connection requirements, low bandwidth) Easy to use technology (e.g., friendly technology, surf around easily and quickly) 4

  17. 3 Available video, audio and text chat Inviting and conducive for communication/learning (e.g., presentation and exchange of ideas) 6 Relaxed (e.g., anywhere anytime, can do multi tasking while listening to the lecture) 2 Feeling as being in class without being in the classroom (e.g., participate instantly, follow the pace easily, communicate effectively) 7 Visual contact (e.g., being able to see class, presentation materials, share Web information 5 Audibility (e.g., easy to hear with clear sound) 4 1

  18. 4 3 2 1 Interaction (easy to converse to make your point, easy to text chat) 6 New concepts, theories, and applications can be presented effectively 5 7 Clear (e.g., superb quality of audio and video, effective reception)

  19. Guest speakers 1 7 Exchanging ideas with class-mates Presentation of materials (e.g., PowerPoint, video clip, whiteboard) 4 3 5 Interaction with class 6 2

  20. Very Effective Moderately Effective Average Effective Somewhat Effective Not Effective

  21. Conclusion • Annual survey of students is an essential part of a continuous improvement process • With the fast pace and growth of IT, it is important to stay on the top of the new tools • New Student Orientation sessions are helpful to set the tone and assure the system compatibility

  22. Thank You For Your Attention!

More Related