1 / 34

Calling Recessions in Real Time By J.D. Hamilton Paper version : Econbrowser May 23 2010

Calling Recessions in Real Time By J.D. Hamilton Paper version : Econbrowser May 23 2010. Marc Wildi Marc.wildi@zhaw.ch. Emphasize of a True Challenge.

macy-carney
Download Presentation

Calling Recessions in Real Time By J.D. Hamilton Paper version : Econbrowser May 23 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Calling Recessions in Real TimeBy J.D. HamiltonPaper version : Econbrowser May 23 2010 Marc Wildi Marc.wildi@zhaw.ch

  2. Emphasize of a True Challenge • “The paper stresses … actual real-time analysis, in which a researcher stakes his/her reputation on publicly using the model to generate out-of-sample, real-time predictions”. • Facing the `true’ future puts oneself in a situation which differs from `feigning to ignore withdrawn data’ (pseudo out of sample exercise). • USRI: http://www.idp.zhaw.ch/usri

  3. Topics • Simplicity, robustness, continual changes • Statistical Revisions: Filter or Smooth? • Replicability • Data-Revisions • Mixed Frequency Approaches

  4. Simplicity, Robustness, Continual Changes

  5. Trade-Off • Abstract: “The paper … emphasizes the fundamental trade-off between parsimony – trying to keep the model as simple and robust as possible – and making full use of available information.”

  6. Precision • One may ask: “as simple as possible” under which circumstance? • Optimization criterion

  7. Shift of Perspective • Proposal: instead of emphasizing the (simplicity of the) model one could stress the (structure of the) optimization criterion.

  8. One-Step Ahead Mean-Square Fit • `Closest fit’-principle is a black-box mechanism: • The criterion does anything to improve the in-sample fit • The user does not have any control on the outcome • Back door: parsimony

  9. Customized Criteria • Could we account for additional or alternative user-relevant aspects of the estimation problem in the optimization criterion?

  10. User Requirements • Expectations: • Reliability • Timeliness • Fitting user-needs `directly’ enhances performances: DFA • Confer an intrinsic out-of-sample quality to the customized criterion • The customized criterion addresses a fundamental uncertainty-principle

  11. Conclusion (Section 6) • “Averaging the inference from alternative specifications or using Bayesian approaches to constrain more richly parameterized specifications are worth exploring.” • Customized criteria • “A particularly promising approach is to combine data of different frequencies”. • I’m more skeptical

  12. Mixed-Frequency

  13. Market Needs • Consumer eagerness for fresh news • As a response one observes a growing tendency to account for high-frequency (daily/weekly) data • ADS (Philadelphia Fed) • Camacho and Perez Quiros (EU) • Mix high-frequency with monthly and quarterly data

  14. Questions • What additional information might we expect to appear in (and hopefully extract – in real time - from) disaggregated noisy `high-frequency’ data that is not already disclosed in monthly aggregates? • Up-date GDP on a `high-frequency’ scale? • How stable/robust are the relations?

  15. ADS-Index

  16. Revisions in the `Eye of the Storm’

  17. Upshot • How much `reliability’ are consumers willing to trade against (alleged) `freshness’?

  18. Data Revisions

  19. Own Experience: USRI • USRI works with standardized log-returns of monthly data • In order to be effective, revisions of time series should affect standardized log-returns

  20. USRI-Revisions due to Data-Update (Different Vintages)

  21. Industrial Production • Frequently fast convergence • Sometimes larger revisions stretch over the whole history • Medium weight associated by filter

  22. Manufacturing and trade sales • Frequently small revisions (fast convergence) • Sometimes larger revisions on whole history • Medium weight assigned by filter

  23. Employment on non-agricultural payroll • Often fast convergence. Sometimes larger revisions but dynamics remain • `consistent’ (turning-points) • Important time series

  24. Personal Income (Less Transfer Payments) • Large revisions (may affect dynamics) • Small weight attributed by the filter

  25. Total civilian employment • Frequently unrevised (unfrequent revisions on whole history) • Most important time series (largest weight attributed by filter)

  26. Filter or Smooth?

  27. Smoothing • Smoothing the history of an Indicator hides/masks real-time performances • Smoothing cosmetics • USRI: WYSIWYG-design • Never calibrate a model on the history of a revised indicator (almost all of them) • Exception: USRI

  28. Replicability

  29. Replicability vs. Subjective Adjustments • Do index-providers discuss/adjust indicator values prior to release or is the release automated? • An important real-time indicator published by a national agency? • Do we have to attribute observed performances to improved statistics or to a clever economic staff relying on `insider’-knowledge (proprietary data)? • Can we (users) replicate an indicator? • Excel-replication of USRI • The Econbrowser-index can be replicated straightforwardly

  30. Miscellaneous

  31. Self-Fulfilling Prophecy • I firmly believe that it is possible to publish a `perfect‘ real-time indicator without affecting the course of the announced recession in any relevant way.

  32. Continual Change of Economic Relations • We don‘t need necessarily fixed or stationary economic relations • What we need is a consistent/stable recession definition (by the NBER) • The USRI relies on `NBER-data‘ • Detecting peaks in Industrial Production, Manufacturing, Employment • Customized real-time filters are optimized to detect the relevant features (turning-points in these series) • As long as the NBER defines recessions this way, the USRI will be pretty `robust‘.

  33. Uncertainty Principle • Reliability and timeliness are conflicting requirements • Address uncertainty-principle explicitly by customized criterion • USRI • MDFA

  34. An Inconvenient Truth • The venerated maximum likelihood principle serves as a formal justification for a capricious black-box mechanism

More Related