1 / 42

Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports pbis.org

Creating School Environments to Prevent Problem Behaviour and Support Students At-Risk and Those with Disabilities through School-wide Positive Behaviour Support. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports pbis.org. Context.

macy
Download Presentation

Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports pbis.org

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Creating School Environments to Prevent Problem Behaviour and Support Students At-Risk and Those with Disabilities through School-wide Positive Behaviour Support Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports pbis.org

  2. Context The School Environment Must Support Appropriate Social & Academic Behavior School-Wide Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention

  3. The Challenge • Students with the most challenging academic and social problems need pro-active comprehensive and consistent systems of support • School-wide discipline systems are typically unclear and inconsistently implemented – absence of a “social behavior curriculum” • Educators often lack specialized skills to address severe problem behavior and learning challenges • Pressure on schools to incorporate national and state initiatives such as Values Education, Anti-Bullying,Safe Schools andachieving “adequate yearly progress.” Many often have clearly defined outcomes without structures to reach or a framework for deciding what should be implemented when, for whom, and to what degree

  4. The Danger…. “Punishing” problem behaviors (without a proactive support system) is associated with increases in (a) aggression, (b) vandalism, (c) truancy, and (d) dropping out. (Mayer, 1995, Mayer & Sulzar-Azaroff, 1991, Skiba & Peterson, 1999)

  5. The Good News… Research reviews indicate that the most effective responses to school violence are (Elliot, Hamburg, & Williams, 1998;Gottfredson, 1997; Lipsey, 1991, 1992; Tolan & Guerra, 1994): Social Skills Training Academic Restructuring Behavioral Interventions

  6. Toward a Solution The answer is not the invention of new solutions, but the enhancement of the school’s organizational capacity to: • Accurately adopt and efficiently sustain their use of research-validated practices • Provide a Seamless continuum of behavioral and academic support for all students • Be part of a district wide system of behavior and academic support • Increased focus, teacher training, community training, and funding for early intervention

  7. School-wide PBS

  8. School-wide Positive Behavioral Support Incorporate best practice in professional development and system change (teams) Emphasizes the use of assessment information to guide intervention and management decisions Focus on the use of a continuum of behavioral supports Focus on increasing the contextual fit between problem context and what we know works Focus on establishing school environments that support long term success of effective practices {3-5 years}

  9. School-wide Positive Behavior Support SW-PBS is a broad range of systemic and individualized strategies for achieving important social and learning outcomes while preventing problem behavior OSEP Center on PBIS

  10. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students

  11. Social Competence & Academic Achievement Positive Behavior Support OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior

  12. Universal Strategies: School-Wide Essential Features • Statement of purpose • Clearly define expected behaviors (Rules) • Procedures for teaching & practicing expected behaviors • Procedures for encouraging expected behaviors • Procedures for discouraging problem behaviors • Procedures for record-keeping and decision making (swis.org) • Family Awareness and Involvement

  13. Benton Elementary

  14. Universal Strategies: Nonclassroom Settings • Identify Setting Specific Behaviors • Develop Teaching Strategies • Develop Practice Opportunities and Consequences • Assess the Physical Characteristics • Establish Setting Routines • Identify Needed Support Structures • Data collection strategies

  15. Universal Strategies:Classroom • Use of school-wide expectations/rules • Effective Classroom Management • Behavior management • Instructional management • Environmental management • Support for teachers who deal with students who display high rates of problem behavior

  16. Importance of Effective Instruction(Sanders, 1999) The single biggest factor affecting academic growth of any population of youngsters is the effectiveness of classroom instruction. The answer to why children learn well or not isn't race, it isn't poverty, it isn't even per-pupil expenditure at the elementary level. The classroom’s effect on academic growth dwarfs and nearly renders trivial all these other factors that people have historically worried about.

  17. Why must schools build strong universal systems of support? Why is Special Education focused on school-wide systems?

  18. Because… • We can’t “make” students learn or behave • We can create environments to increase the likelihood students learn and behave • Environments that increase the likelihood are guided by a core curriculum and implemented with consistency and fidelity

  19. Risk and Protective Factor Comparison t = -2.17 (37) p < .036 t = 2.31 (37) p < .026 Partial N=21 Full N=18 Partial N=21 Full N=18

  20. A&D = Alcohol and Drug; ABS = Anti-social Behavior Scale

  21. Small Group and Individual Interventions Supporting Students At-Risk and those with Disabilities

  22. Important Themes • Part of a continuum – must link to school-wide PBS system • Efficient and effective way to identify students • Assessment = simple sort • Intervention matched to presenting problem but not highly individualized

  23. Assessment Focus is on sorting student for service, not “diagnosis and placement.” • Social-Behavioral Concerns • Social skills • Self-management • Academic Concerns • Peer Tutors • Check in • Homework club • Emotional Concerns • Adult mentors

  24. Individual Support Plans • When small group not sufficient • When problem intense and chronic • Driven by Functional Behavioral Assessment • Linked to school-wide system

  25. FBA – PBS Plan Process Success requires: • Individual(s) with expertise in FBA-PBS • Fluency with a clear process among all staff including their role • A basic understanding of Applied Behavior Analysis =Behavior is functionally related to the teaching environment

  26. Essential Steps to Individual PBS Plans • Request for assistance • Operationally define problem/replacement behavior • Background/archival data/ data collection/Environmental Assessment • Functional Behavioral Assessment Indirect measures Direct observation • Develop hypothesis regarding function of problem behavior • Develop a PBS plan Social skill instruction Self management Environmental modifications • Implement, Monitor and Evaluate progress

  27. Response to Intervention

  28. Academic Systems Behavioral Systems • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • High Intensity • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • Intense, durable procedures • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Universal Interventions • All students • Preventive, proactive • Universal Interventions • All settings, all students • Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success 1-5% 1-5% 5-10% 5-10% 80-90% 80-90%

  29. Consistent “core” curriculum implemented school-wide (research-based) Core instruction follows effective instructional practices (NWREL.org) Core instruction implemented with fidelity Consistent, prioritized, and protected time allocated to instruction Data decision rules to identify a) those at high risk and b) “non-responders” in a timely manner Universal Supports: Core Instruction

  30. Targeted / Small Supports

  31. Important Themes • Part of a continuum – must link to core curriculum • Efficient and effective way to identify students (Curriculum Based Measures; DIBELS) through FREQUENT monitoring • Intervention matched to presenting problem but not highly individualized

  32. Intensify Instruction Increase academic engaged time Small group / one:one Increased opportunities to respond Supplemental curriculum Alter Instructional Environment Rules & routines Attention signal Ratio of positive / negative statements Efficient transitions Active supervision Targeted Supports

  33. Individual / Intensive

  34. Individual • When small group/targeted not sufficient • When data indicate high risk* • Linked to core curriculum / outcomes *limited data beyond literacy

  35. Individual/ Intensive • Targeted assessment (Curriculum Based Measures; DIBELS) • Instruction targets remediation and/or accommodation • Environment provides multiple and sustained engagement opportunities • Monitor outcomes and make necessary adjustments (progress monitoring)

  36. RtI Applications (Sugai, 2007)

More Related