1 / 21

K-H SERVICE-LEARNING PARTNESHIPS: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

K-H SERVICE-LEARNING PARTNESHIPS: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Paula W. Flaherty, MS Rudy Pauley, Ed.D. Marshall University South Charleston, West Virginia. PURPOSE. To examine service-learning partnerships, especially over time To examine benefits and challenges for all partners.

maddox
Download Presentation

K-H SERVICE-LEARNING PARTNESHIPS: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. K-H SERVICE-LEARNING PARTNESHIPS:The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Paula W. Flaherty, MS Rudy Pauley, Ed.D. Marshall University South Charleston, West Virginia

  2. PURPOSE • To examine service-learning partnerships, especially over time • To examine benefits and challenges for all partners

  3. AGENDA • Definitions of service-learning • Definitions of a service-learning partnership • West Virginia example of a long-standing partnership • Polvika’s model – S-L partnership • Application of model

  4. What are we really talking about? Service-learning Service-learning Serviceandlearning

  5. Service-Learning Partnership Placement site for students? Collaborative program?

  6. West VirginiaService-Learning Consortium Kanawha County Schools University of Charleston United Way of Central West Virginia

  7. What are your experiences with service-learning partnerships?

  8. Polivka Model • “A conceptual model for community interagency collaboration”Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1995; 27(2), 110-115. Dr. Barbara Polivka Associate Professor Ohio State University

  9. Environmental Factors • Political – ”the will or need for a particular service”; “local political climate” • Demographic – “population characteristics” • Social - “local social priorities” • Economic – “available funding sources”;

  10. Situational Factors • Awareness – “awareness of other organizations – agencies”; knowledge of goals, resources, capacity” • Resource dependency – “awareness of available resources (funds, clients & personnel)” • Domain similarity – “service is enhanced when complimentary resources are pooled to achieve mutual goals” • Consensus- “the greater the concordance between the organizations, the greater the potential for successful collaboration”

  11. Task Characteristics • Scope • Complexity • Time • Volume • Duration • Uncertainty

  12. Transactional factors • Intensity – “the strength of the interagency relationships” • Resource flows • Conflict • Formation – “formal or informal relationship” • Joint Decision Making • Mutual adjustment – Few common goals – case specific • Corporate – Umbrella authority, formal rules & policies • Alliance – Blending of mutual adjustment and alliance • Structure • Size • Centralization • Pattern

  13. Foss, Bonaiuto, Johnson & Moreland adaptation of Polivka Model • “Using Polivka’s model to create a service-learning partnership” Journal of School Health, 2003, 73(8), 305-310. Dr. Gwendolyn Foss Maria Bonaiuto Sue Johnson Dee Moreland

  14. Principles of Effective Partnerships • Principles foster equality among partners • Share mission, values, goal and outcomes • Mutual trust, respect and commitment • Builds on strengths and assets and addresses areas that need improvement • Power is balanced • Communication is clear and open and stress listening

  15. Principles of Effective Partnerships cont… • Roles, norms and processes are jointly developed • Partners constantly interact to improve partnership • All share the credit for accomplishments • Partnerships evolve over time

  16. West Virginia Service-Learning Consortium over 11 years Kanawha Service-Learning Consortium

  17. Kanawha Service-Learning Consortium How does it stack up?

  18. Small Group Activity • Discuss critical changes you identified • Look at all nine principals • Discuss impact on WV S-L partnership • Share with large group

  19. Outcomes • Organization – “strengthening of partnerships” • Inter-organizational – “builds foundation for future collaborative efforts” • Client – “provides service for the client” • Community – “fosters community collaboration”; “showcases positive models for future projects”

  20. Recommended Resources • Alter, C., & Hage, J.(1993). Organizations working together. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications • Mettetal, G. & Bryant, D. (1996). Service learning research projects. College Teaching, 44(1). • Peacock, J., Bradley, D. & Shenk, D.(2001). Incorporating field sites into service learning as collaborative partners. Educational Gerontology, 27(23), 23-35. • Tai-Seale, T. (2001). Liberating service learning and applying the new practice. College Teaching, 49(1).

  21. Paula W. Flaherty, Ed.D. Director, West Virginia Service-Learning Institute Instructor, Teacher Education Program University of Charleston 2300 MacCorkle Avenue, SE Charleston, WV paulaflaherty@ucwv.edu Rudy Pauley, Ed.D. Marshall University School of Education & Professional Development 100 Angus E. Peyton Drive South Charleston, WV 25303 rpauley@marshall.edu

More Related