1 / 20

WP3. Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Plan

WP3. Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Plan. Dr. Luis Sobrado 27 th May 2011. Purpose. Project objectives. Results of the project. Results of the project. Project impact. Project impact. What does quality look like. European Commission (EC) Award criteria.

maddy
Download Presentation

WP3. Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP3. Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Plan Dr. Luis Sobrado 27thMay 2011

  2. Purpose

  3. Project objectives

  4. Results of the project

  5. Results of the project

  6. Project impact

  7. Project impact

  8. What does quality look like

  9. European Commission (EC) Award criteria • Quality of the methodology and the work programme. • Innovative character. • Quality of the consortium. • European added value. • The cost-benefit ratio. • Impact and relevance of the results. • Quality of the dissemination and exploitation plan.

  10. What the EC expects • Achieve progress in line with the agreed dates: • Progress report by 31.03.2012 • Final report by 30.09.2013

  11. Risk factors

  12. Online external evaluation grid for the pilots

  13. Online external evaluation grid for the pilots – possible structure • About you. • About the tools: • Presentation. • Guidance on how to use the tools. • Accessibility and usability. • Language. • Content.

  14. Internal evaluation questionnaire and methodological approach

  15. Purpose • To enable partners to give feedback on the project processes. • To enable the early identification of problems and difficulties so that solutions can be quickly found. • To collect evidence for the final report.

  16. What does quality look like • Project aims understood across the partnership. • Roles and responsibilities understood and carried out. • Deadlines agreed and kept to. • EC financial procedures followed.

  17. Method – Internal evaluation questionnaire

  18. Internal evaluation questionnaire - sections • Project procedures. • Work packages. • Dissemination and mainstreaming. • Tools. • Project’s added value.

  19. Internal evaluation report • As well as the analysis of the questionnaires, the internal report will also include a report from the USC evaluator. • The role of the evaluator is to: • Discuss issues raised by the project. • Identify what the project has achieved.

  20. Final external evaluation report • The effectiveness of project processes • What the project has achieved. • Issues raised by the project, e.g. to assist EC policy and future funding priorities.

More Related