1 / 33

Outline What do we want to know? Cloud microphysical parameters Cloud fraction and albedo

A Sharper View of Fuzzy Objects: Warm Clouds and their Role in the Climate System as seen by Satellite Ralf Bennartz University of Wisconsin – Madison. Outline What do we want to know? Cloud microphysical parameters Cloud fraction and albedo Conclusions and outlook.

madeson-valenzuela
Download Presentation

Outline What do we want to know? Cloud microphysical parameters Cloud fraction and albedo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Sharper View of Fuzzy Objects: Warm Clouds and their Role in the Climate System as seen by Satellite Ralf Bennartz University of Wisconsin – Madison

  2. Outline • What do we want to know? • Cloud microphysical parameters • Cloud fraction and albedo • Conclusions and outlook

  3. Clouds are the single-most important factor modulating climate sensitivity….. … and we know very little about forcings and feedbacks IPCC 2007

  4. 21 climate models- one scenario IPCC 2007

  5. How can observations help narrow down these uncertainties?

  6. What do we need to know? • Cloud droplet number concentration (N) • Liquid water path (LWP) • Drizzle/rain? Rain water path (RWP) • Cloud fraction • Albedo

  7. (Sub) adiabatic stratiform clouds LWC

  8. LWP from VIS/NIR: Factor f depends on stratification of cloud (e.g. f=5/9 for adiabatic, f=2/3 for vertically uniform) • N for an adiabatic cloud related to optical depth and LWP. C depends weakly on temperature and width of droplet spectrum Basic physical relations

  9. LWP from VIS/NIR: Factor f depends on stratification of cloud (e.g. f=5/9 for adiabatic, f=2/3 for vertically uniform) • N for an adiabatic cloud related to optical depth and LWP. C depends weakly on temperature and width of droplet spectrum • MW: Very direct measurement. Mass absorption coefficient depends slightly on temperature, σr depends on rain water content too. Basic physical relations

  10. Basic physical relations Bennartz et al. (2010)

  11. Basic physical relations Bennartz et al. (2010)

  12. Three input variables (τVIS reff τMW) • Three output variables (N,LWP,RWP) Basic physical relations

  13. Three input variables (τVISreff τMW) • Three output variables (N,LWP,RWP) • Auxiliary data, assumptions: • Cloud top height • Cloud top temperature • Drizzle/rain particle size distribution • Width of cloud droplet spectrum Basic physical relations

  14. Direct physical relationship between MW/VNIR optical properties and cloud physical properties. • Errors and uncertainties due to input and auxiliary parameters can be specified and dependencies can be explicitly spelled out. • Validity of assumptions can be assessed from observations. • No unknown unknowns (though a lot of known unknowns). Basic physical relations

  15. Products Bennartz et al. (2010), Bennartz (2007), Rausch et al. (2010)

  16. Cloud droplet number concentration

  17. Cloud droplet number concentration

  18. Cloud droplet number concentration Bennartz et al. (2011)

  19. Cloud droplet number concentration Bennartz et al. (2011)

  20. Application example: Constraining cloud-aerosol interaction processes in GCMs Differences in cloud droplet activation account for about 65 % (1.3 W/m2) of the total spread in shortwave forcing (2 W/m2) in IPCC AR4 models Storelvmo, Lohmann, Bennartz (2009)

  21. Open issues & proposed solutions • Deviations from adiabaticity  valid ‘targets’can be identified by checking multi-spectral agreement of reff with adiabatic assumption.

  22. Effective Radius

  23. Open issues & proposed solutions • Deviations from adiabaticity  valid ‘targets’can be identified by checking multi-spectral agreement of reff with adiabatic assumption.

  24. Open issues & proposed solutions • Deviations from adiabaticity  valid ‘targets’can be identified by checking multi-spectral agreement of reff with adiabatic assumption. • Physical explanation for differences in reff still outstanding: partly cloudy pixels, subscale variability, rain, 3D…. Probably all of them to some extend

  25. Validating models: LWP observations against iRAM Lauer et al. (2009)

  26. Special Sensor Microwave/Imager

  27. Liquid Water Path [kg/m2] Local Time [hours]

  28. Liquid Water Path [kg/m2] Local Time [hours]

  29. Liquid Water Path [kg/m2] Local Time [hours]

  30. Liquid Water Path [kg/m2] Local Time [hours]

  31. Liquid Water Path [kg/m2] Local Time [hours]

  32. Conclusions • Satellite observations provide a wealth of information about cloud microphysical and radiative properties. • Simple physically-based cloud models provide an excellent framework to interpret satellite observations and brigde gap between observations and GCMs • Caveats, uncertainties, and the limits of our current understanding need to be conveyed. • Working closely with GCM/RCM community.

  33. Acknowledgements Collaborations: A. Lauer (U Hawaii), T. Storelvmo (Yale), U. Lohmann (ETH), J. Rausch (UW-AOS), L. Borg, (UW-AOS), A. Heidinger, (NOAA), M. Foster (CIMSS), R. Leung (PNNL), J. Fan (PNNL), C. O’Dell (CSU), R. Wood (UW) Funding: NASA MODIS Science Team, NOAA/Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, DOE Regional Climate Modeling

More Related