40 likes | 154 Views
Comparison of the Project Dissemination Reports period: 01 12 2005 – 30 03 2006. Coordinating institution Klaipeda College of Social Sciences Project coordinator Jurate Raisyte 06 2006, Klaipeda.
E N D
Comparison of the Project Dissemination Reports period: 01 12 2005 – 30 03 2006 Coordinating institution Klaipeda College of Social Sciences Project coordinator Jurate Raisyte 06 2006, Klaipeda
The means of dissemination project partners have used for the period of four months (between two partner meetings) • GiovanEuropa and Resources Ltd. • Web site • E – mails • Local meetings • Newsletter • Brochures • Klaipeda College of Social Sciences • Production of the leaflet • Article updated on the college’s website www.klsmk.lt after fourth project meeting in Bratislava (Slovakia) under division “News” • Short project presentation for the Mariner’s Wives Union • Centre for Development of Education • Internet – website • Meetings within and outside the organisation • Updating the website www.socimma.com • Newsletter “Work and progress of the project” – February 2006 • Transfer Slovakia Ltd. haven’t prepared report for this period.
The most significant results/benefits gained by organisations at dissemination points of this project period • GiovanEuropa and Resources Ltd. • We have spread information on possible results • We have promoted the European partnership and development possible local partnerships • Klaipeda College of Social Sciences • The most important and significant result is meeting with target audience, because conversations with people are most effective and fruitful way of dissemination. • The involvement and active participation of volunteers in Project Management Centre processes helped to work more productively and spread the information about the project widely than before. • Centre for Development of Education • Newsletter “Work and progress of the project” – February 2006 • Updating of the common website www.socimma.com, in order to: • Bring the new partners of the second year (GoivanEuropa, Italy and Risources Ltd., Italy) in to the project • Show the degree of shared investigations in a common developed European project website • Contact the former Austrian partner to confirm their further interest in the project • Transfer Slovakia Ltd. haven’t prepared report for this period.
Dissemination results of all partners • All the partners used website, leaflets or brochures and newsletters to disseminate the project. It is the most popular, usual way to spread important information to target groups, the audience. • Leaflet or brochure: Italian, Lithuanian partners. • Newsletters and e – mails: partners from Denmark and Italy. • Project website is the dissemination it’s self (administrators are Danish partners) • The most targeted mean of dissemination are meetings, short presentations etc. to the audience. This mean was used by all the partners. • Article as a point of dissemination was written by coordinating institution college of Social Sciences. NOTE: partners should put the project website www.socimma.com and project description firstly in their organisation websites, write articles, meet local newspapers and give information about the project, it’s products, results etc.