290 likes | 645 Views
Technology-enhanced language learning: innovation and new pedagogy. Pete Sharma LABCI, Buenos Aires September 2009. Part one: what’s new?. Background ‘Blended learning’ New technologies New pedagogies Benefits & constraints. Background.
E N D
Technology-enhanced language learning: innovation and new pedagogy Pete Sharma LABCI, Buenos Aires September 2009
Part one: what’s new? • Background • ‘Blended learning’ • New technologies • New pedagogies • Benefits & constraints
Background i) Computers have changed our lives as teachers forever Corpus linguistics Word frequency Course book authenticity Neologisms
(ii) CALL is situation specific • Computer-aided language learning • Solution in situation A has no impact on Situation B • Classrooms - online • ‘Comparing apples and oranges’
(iii) New era • Digital natives • Digital immigrants • Publishers no longer solely ‘own’ content • Web 2.0 • User content • collaborative
(iv) Technology – driven world • Innovators – early adapters - early majority • Pedagogy playing ‘catch-up’ • Pedagogy is crucial for language teaching
(2) Blended learning Combination of..... • work + training • f2f classroom + online • pedagogical approaches • Technologies • Real world / in world
New pedagogies • Grammar • Vocabulary • Language Skills • Listening • Speaking • Listening + speaking
Benefits & constraints BENEFITS • Learning beyond the classroom – time and place • Cross-border projects – affect of global audience • Facilitates learner choice • Opportunities for creativity
Develop learners digital literacies • Save on a pen drive • Currency – Michael Jackson • Multi-modality – kinaesthetic learners
CONSTRAINTS • Back up • Takes time – calibrate IWB • Cutting through the hype • Infrastructure – cost • “Don’t use it for the sake of it” vs $$$
IWB Pros Cons Cost – benefit ratio Return to teacher-centred learning Ignores Web 2.0 • Power of multimedia • Transparent fourth wall • Promotes learner engagement • Review is easy • Memorable presentations
On-line grammar practice Non-standard forms unfinished product vs process ‘grammaring’
Stakeholders Cline of understanding about potential use of technology (Peachey): • Students excellent • Teachers ok • Trainers not so good • Educator of teacher trainer poor • Employer of educator what???
Students • “What’s the fuss?” • Learner training electronic dictionaries ‘wikipedia’ plagiarism
Teachers • confront technophobia • teacher development • ‘appropriate’ • start with learner needs
Academic management / management • Training infrastructure • Online ‘is best’ for subject specific / ‘Blended is best’ study shows – language teaching? • Win-win is possible
Final thoughts • New tools are emerging all the time • 2 years time – ‘buzz’ technology....? • Principled teaching • Embrace a digital future