810 likes | 1.15k Views
Pulmonary Function Testing. Sandra B. Weibel MD Thomas Jefferson University. Indications. Differential diagnosis of dyspnea Provides objective assessment of symptoms versus severity Determine fitness for surgery To guide therapy To follow the course of a disease.
E N D
Pulmonary Function Testing Sandra B. Weibel MD Thomas Jefferson University
Indications • Differential diagnosis of dyspnea • Provides objective assessment of symptoms versus severity • Determine fitness for surgery • To guide therapy • To follow the course of a disease
Physiologic classification of disease • Obstructive Impairment- Airway limitation due to the resistive properties of the respiratory system • Restrictive Impairment- Loss of volume capacity of the lung due to loss of air space units or inability to expand the respiratory system
Obstructive Processes • L ocal obstruction • A sthma • C hronic bronchitis (COPD) • E mphysema
Restrictive Processes • P leural disease • A lveolar filling processes • I nterstial lung disease • N euromuscular diseases • T horacic cage abnormailites
Spirometry • Most widely performed study and is important in initial screening of patients • Easily and quickly performed in many settings
Types of spirometers • Types include flow (pneumotach) or volume (water seal, rolling and diaphragm) • Water seal device previoisly most commonly used in pulmonary function labs of the volume • Collect exhaled gas and act as a reservoir for inhaled gas • Composed of a mouthpiece, bell system and a pen on a rotating drum
Calibration of spirometer • Warmed up and temperature controlled Barometric pressure and temperature recorded • Volume calibration with 3L syringe (within 3%) • Flow spirometer tested at 3 flow rates between 2 and 12L
Performing the maneuver • It is a forced expiratory maneuver and the patient must be sitting upright in a chair with lips around a mouthpiece • After a maximal inspiration, a forced and rapid expiration is made • Quality of the maneuver needs to be assessed noting that the patient started at zero, had a maximal initial efffort and lasted 6 seconds.
Measurements • FVC • FEV1 • FEV1/FVC • Also FEF25-75 and TET
Interpretation • First need to assess the quality of the maneuvers • Choice of reference values • Use of LLN • Compare to previous tests • Race adjustments
Restrictive Lung FVC AND FEV1 decreased FEV1/FVC normal FEV1 main distinguishing feature Obstruction FEV1 decreased FVC Normal FEV1/FVC are low Interpretation
Pitfalls in Interpretation • Predicted need to fit your population • Non Caucasians have lower lung volumes and this may need to be addressed • Prior to interpretation the test needs to be assessed to see if it meets standards • Machines need to be calibrated daily to ensure accuracy
Interpretation • The patient’s data is compared to predicted • Predicted values are obtained after studying populations of normal nonsmokers and then regression equations developed • Regressions are based on sex, height, and age.
References • Many different ones used in past Knudson Crapo etc • Current recommendation is NHANES III • This studied over 7000 individuals • Included Caucasians, blacks and Mexican Americans
Interpretaion • Normal is > 80% of predicted • Mild impairment 65-79% • Moderate 50 -64% • Severe < 50%
Flow Volume Loops • Inspiratory loops can also be obtained to evaluate for the presence of large airway obstruction • Theory changes in pressure outside and inside the thoracic cage will cause changes in airway diameter • These airway changes can cause a limitation to airflow if large enough
Bronchodilator testing • No short acting agents for 4 hrs • No long acting beta agonists for 12 hrs • No theo for 12 hrs • No smoking for 1 hr • Beta agonist given recommended 4 puffs and wait 10-15 minutes later